Two London mini blogs

Thursday 29th January 2026

Superloop expands again

Last weekend saw the eleventh (ignoring Bakerloop) Superloop branded route introduced by TfL. The new Go-Ahead London operated SL11 between North Greenwich and Abbey Wood has merely replaced the now withdrawn route 472 between the same locations with the added feature of it being ‘express’ or more accurately ‘limited stop’ with 25 of the former intermediate stops on the 472 now abandoned leaving just 16 served by the SL11 and a more direct routing through Woolwich town centre.

So it’s great news if you live near one of the stops still served and your destination is also still served – then you’re in for a treat especially as buses on the SL11 now run every six minutes whereas the erstwhile 472 ran every 9-10 minutes. But, of course, it’s not such good news if you used the stops no longer served by buses on the SL11 with your journey now destined to take longer and the inconvenience of a change of bus using one of the other routes serving those now bypassed.

It’s the first time this has happened with the Mayor’s pet Superloop project. A route hasn’t previously been completely withdrawn with other launches – frequency downgrades yes, but not a complete withdrawal.

The test will be whether enough passengers are generated by the quicker journey times on the new SL11 to make up for any lost passengers who give up travelling now it’s more inconvenient. Obviously TfL has kept the most popular stops so those benefitting will number more than those at a disadvantage but it’ll be interesting to see how the overall use of the new arrangements pans out in the next few months.

As you can see from the map above, the SL11 serves the all important Thamesmead estate at the eastern end of its route. This residential area has lacked a track based link into central London (National Rail, Underground or DLR) since it was established in the late 1960s, save for the trek down to Abbey Wood station (now also served by the Elizabeth line, of course). Route 472 was therefore a key link for residents living on the eastern side of the estate wanting to reach Plumstead and Woolwich.

It’s unfortunate, therefore, that the SL11 is only serving one pair of bus stops on the eastern side of the estate (marked in green on the above map). I’d have thought picking up at each stop in that area would have made for a more successful and convenient service for residents living there and then go fast towards Plumstead, Woolwich, Charlton and North Greenwich.

The SL11 hasn’t got off to a very promising start with only a handful of buses in the new high profile Superloop SL11 branding. When I took a ride yesterday morning just three New Routemasters were out in service with the other 14 buses registering on the tracking being a ragbag of life expired 16 year old Wright Eclipse Gemini bodied Volvo B9TLs which have completed their innings on TfL work and must be ready for downgrading to school work somewhere or even a new life in Cornwall.

You don’t usually launch a high profile new bus route with your oldest buses which have seen better days.

The timing is also odd when there are significant roadworks taking place along a key part of the route between Charlton and Woolwich with bus lanes temporarily out of use while new cycle lanes and beautification of the street environment is taking place.

And you also don’t keep old maps and information on display advising passengers route 472 is very much still part of the network…

… as seen here outside Abbey Wood station. It makes me wonder why TfL proceeded with this introduction date when clearly not everything was ready. Why not postpone it for a few weeks?

I travelled on a journey leaving North Greenwich at 10:14 yesterday morning. We carried 21 passengers with eight boarding at the terminus, two at IKEA, two in Charlton, five in Woolwich, one at Plumstead bus garage, one at Woolwich Crown Court and two as we skimmed around Thamesmead.

It took just 39 minutes to reach Abbey Wood which was impressively quick with the schedule allowing 43 minutes and the 472 used to take getting on for an hour.

However, I understand the number of buses needed to run this more frequent and quicker service is now 20 compared to 16 on the former 472, so costs have increased by a quarter meaning substantially more revenue needs to be generated.

Looking at the numbers travelling on the many buses I saw along the route yesterday morning there’s a long way to go to justify the frequency and resources now deployed.

Hopefully once the vehicle allocation is sorted and more branded New Routemasters introduced on to the route awareness of the new improved service (for those for whom it is an improvement) will increase, and so will numbers travelling.

You can’t catch a Tube from Southgate

There’s been a fair bit of consternation in my old home patch of north London since the New Year when TfL closed Southgate Underground station for entry to access the Piccadilly line until mid March to allow for maintenance of the escalators.

This has closed off one of the escalators allowing the other one to continue to operate in an upwards direction and thereby keep the station open but as exit only.

The consternation comes when passengers see the stairs are still available and it’s argued would be satisfactory for those willing to walk down to the platforms.

Instead passengers are offered a choice of catching a bus either southbound to Arnos Grove on the relatively infrequent (every 20 minutes) route 298 taking nine minutes or the more circuitous (17 minutes) route 382 but slightly more frequent at every 14-15 minutes), or head north to Oakwood on the every-10-minutes route 121 with an eight minute journey. TfL also suggest taking the 298 or 299 (every 15 minutes) even further north to Cockfosters taking eight minutes or 13 minutes respectively. (All journey times are off-peak with more time needed in the peaks).

And this being TfL, there’s no mention of the added cost of paying £1.75 for your journey on the bus, although those reaching a daily or weekly cap won’t pay extra.

And, obviously passengers living on one of the aforementioned routes in between the stations may not have so much of an increased overall journey time, although others living on bus routes such as the 125 and W9 towards Winchmore Hill will face added inconvenience of a change of bus before reaching an Underground station.

I’m sure they would welcome the chance to nip down the stairs at Southgate and not worry about there not being an escalator.

I recently made a journey from Southgate into central London and chose the 298 option as it was the first bus to arrive. As you can see about a dozen passengers boarded with more also picked up along the route all heading to Arnos Grove, where we all alighted to make our way to the platforms.

I’ve never seen Southgate’s platforms so quiet – with no-one waiting to board.

For those unfamiliar with north London’s bus route network, the options present a potentially confusing choice, all the more so if you turn to TfL’s famed ‘Go’ app and journey planner, which yesterday afternoon was confirming a journey between Arnos Grove and Southgate would take three minutes with an additional three/four minutes walk to access and leave the station platforms…

… but in the other direction, the two favoured options were to take a 19 minute walk from Southgate to Arlington Road where you’d catch a bus on route 184 for a one minute bus journey to Arnos Grove.

Something not mentioned on the poster at all. And why walk 19 minutes only to wait for a bus for a minute’s ride? Crazy. But that’s Journey Planners for you.

Interestingly, on my way to Southgate I changed at St Pancras from Thameslink to the Piccadilly line and noticed one of the two escalators from the former line’s northbound platform B to the landing level is also undergoing maintenance…

… and in true Network Rail St Pancras fashion they’ve made the one working escalator downwards and are making everyone climb the stairs to exit the station.

And the sign states wrongly to “please use the adjacent escalator”. But as you can see, there isn’t one!

That notice is more appropriate for the situation between the landing level and the main concourse where there’s a bank of three escalators, so taking one out of service enables the other two to offer both directions.

Thank goodness Network Rail didn’t follow TfL’s lead and make St Pancras exit only for Thameslink passengers during the works – as at Southgate. Climbing stairs is a small price to pay (but I’d prefer walking down).

Roger French

Blogging timetable: 06:00 TThS

24 thoughts on “Two London mini blogs

Add yours

  1. There’s a similar situation at Victoria Underground station. You can only exit from the Victoria line ticket hall. To enter you have to go on a subterranean diversion route which takes ages. To add insult to injury the down escalator which formerly provided the ‘direct’ route is still running but taped off ! You could understand introducing these measures in the peaks to deal with specific flows but not all the time. Even the staff agree that it’s daft. Unfortunately ‘one size fits all TfL’ has not done anything to sort this out. Every journey matters.

    Martin W

    Like

  2. One of the downsides of TfL owning its own buses (as the LT buses are so owned) and then leasing them to the operator is that, when buses are transferred between operators is that the receiving operator may find that the buses are not acceptable to them. This works fine if the buses are relatively new . . . but the LT buses are no longer relatively new; indeed with the earlier examples now around 11-12 years old, they require more maintenance than before.

    My understanding is that the buses selected for transfer were unacceptable to GoAhead without, in some cases, considerable rectification work. The problem with delaying the launch is that the TfL machine, once started, is exceeding difficult to halt . . . as with all monoliths. I’m bound to say that, whilst shabby, the stand-in buses seened to be quite adequate when I rode on an SL11 last Saturday.

    My journey (the 1317-ish from Abbey Wood to North Greenwich) was very busy, so much so that I had to share my top-deck seat with other passengers!! Most bus stops had had Route 472 removed and SL11 displayed, although there were some stops that had been missed. I have to say that there were very few instances of excessive bell pushes to ask for stops no longer served, and similarly very few, if any, instances of the bus being hailed at unserved stops . . . indeed, there were very few passengers waiting at such stops, so perhaps the stops selected for Route SL11 were about right?

    My journey, despite being very busy, and having a driver-change at Woolwich en-route, was completed in the nominal time, despite substantial roadworks west of Woolwich. I believe the route was “free” on that Saturday . . . but that was only from overhearing other passengers . . . maybe that’s why the trip was so busy?

    Like

    1. I believe the intended LTs were, ironically, the vehicles formerly used on the SL3, thus returning them to their Thamesmead habitat! Sadly, and I quite like the vehicles myself, observations appeared to show their performance at Bromley was not an outstanding success. I presumed the sudden change from crawling around more central London streets at 7-8mph to fast running considerable distances on the SL3 had been too much of a culture shock. Some vehicles never recovered as Go-Ahead must have discovered.

      I think I am right in saying that since the introduction of the Superloop services, not one has had any alteration to stopping places in the light of operating experience. If so, is this another example of TfL inflexibility, or just getting it “right” in the first place?

      The excessive bell-pushing is now par for the course on all London services, and apart from sending most Drivers mad (and me!), I can only presume quite a large section of the population are now simply unable to read or understand the “Bus Stopping” signs on both decks. It is time to make the signal silent, retain the illuminated passenger saloon screens and simply show as a sign in the Drivers cab.

      Terence Uden

      Like

      1. The bell-pushing isn’t just a London issue – we certainly have it here in Cardiff! I think that people either have earbuds in or are simply “in a world of their own” and don’t seem to notice the bell.

        I don’t think one could have no audible alert as that would make difficult for people with poor sight. But could one have a system in which the bell is silenced when the light comes after an initial push?

        Like

  3. It’s a shame, as you say, that passenger information at times of repairs is not given more priority. I suppose the excuse is lack of money due to budgets being so tight, but PI is really important, especially in London where public transport is used by so many visitors.

    I wonder if TfL or the Mayor’s Office has considered a universal minimum bus frequency of, say, 8 per hour – at least for routes numbered 399 and under. It would make so many journeys easier, and attract more modal transfer from cars, as well as simplifying getting from Southgate to anothe Piccadilly line station when an escalator is out of commission. De-risking journeys involving changes would ‘grow the market’ – after all that is the situation on the tube, where for over a hundred years people have confidently travelled using the well signed interchanges and frequent services, even before the advent of the journey-planner and its vagueries.

    Like

    1. Ref: I wonder if TfL or the Mayor’s Office has considered a universal minimum bus frequency of, say, 8 per hour

      I understand that average bus speeds in central London have dropped to 6.8mph thanks to a combination of factors such as traffic congestion, deliberate narrowing of certain thoroughfares to accommodate cycling & of course, the ridiculous lowering of the maximum speed limit to 20mph. No wonder the number of buses operating day to day has, & continues to reduce. All the gains achieved between the years 2000 to 2015 (book reference ‘Regenerating London’s Buses’) appears to have been reversed under the current Mayor.

      Like

    2. I’d be impressed to see 8 trips an hour on the 389 and 399, a significantly expensive uplift required here for penny numbers of pax, or possibly quite a tight schedule for the current driver with no extra resource deployed!! 🤪🤪

      Like

  4. the SL11 , 472 should have been switch both to a 7.5min frequency, there is more development coming on the route, and extend SL11 north to Canary Wharf as a cheaper alternative to Elizabeth Line

    I have been told in blog comments the St Pancras Thameslink escalators can only go in the initially assigned direction of travel

    I assume Southgate staircase is needed for access during the replacement works thus the passenger restriction. Khan was grilled on it in questions last week by assembly members and didn’t have a clear answer. What tfl need is a combined tube bus fare lower than the current two additive

    JBC Prestatyn

    Like

  5. Am I the only person (or mouse) who is niggled by TfL’s insistence on calling limited stop urban services “express”? There’s nothing express about staggering along a congested London road ignoring some stops!

    And, yes, (for once) I do agree with Roger: it would have made much more sense for the SL11 to call at all stops around Thamesmead then run limited stop along the rest of the route.

    Like

    1. well the X68 was express and the X26 long non stop section. It turns road speed into the limiting factor rather than boarding and set down times.

      JBC Prestatyn

      Like

  6. The situation at Southgate is particularly interesting as Maida Vale currently has one escalator undergoing refurbishment so to go down to the platforms its the fixed staircase and then the escalator for exiting. This arrangement is expected to continue you to Mid-March. So one can then wonder what is so special about Southgate that they have made it exit only, yet Maida Vale which is in a similar state of affairs gets to remain open both for entry and exit. Its certainly inconsistent. Of course one would want the Maida Vale standard applied, not the Southgate one.

    Like

  7. St. John’s Wood also lacking an escalator since before Christmas, apparently broken down awaiting parts on a lengthy back order, and potentially also awaiting the new escalator repair contractor to mobilise.

    Currently walk down is permitted, just about ok with usual daily volumes.

    but if this continues into he cricket season at nearby Lord’s I suspect station will have to be exit only at the end of matches, maybe all day, with the nearest stations (Baker st, Swiss Cottage, south hampstead) a multi-minute, multi stop bus ride away.

    milesT

    Like

    1. I cannot see a repair happening within 4 months. Perhaps a special bus baker street golders green could be considered

      JBC Prestatyn

      Like

    1. Well who on earth thinks it’s ok to… 

      install escalators that only work in one direction, or leave maps and signage for services that have been withdrawn on display, or force your customers on a totally unnecessary 20 minute daily detour whilst actually charging them extra for the inconvenience caused? Only faceless and unaccountable managers who haven’t a clue what it actually means to the travelling public, and just don’t care about the impact it has on them, that’s who.. “your journey doesn’t matter to us at all”

      Like

  8. The life expired Volvo B9s are even more life expired because the batch of Streetliners (DEL 17-36) supposedly for the 131 (where the the B9s came from) were nicked by Bexleyheath for the 269 & 401, and are only gradually moving to AL now. The 131 should have had its electrics TWO YEARS ago. From a long suffering 131 & knackered B9 passenger.

    Like

    1. would the delay be a mix of the Me fire situation making a review and getting charging facilities at AL to needed level

      JBC Prestatyn

      Like

  9. At my age I’ve developed a ‘Phobia’ about escalator travel especially in the down direction fearing loss of balance so this situation at Southgate would really have me ‘unsettled’ which is why I stick to known routes on the Underground with level interchange, short staircases or lifts. So that rules out a lot of Zone 1. And typically TfL doesn’t make provision for those with ‘rail only’ travel facilities or closures on National Rail permitting alternative use of the Underground. With the proximity of Southgate to the ‘Great Northern’ line it must surely have been quoted as an ‘alternative’ in cases of ‘Mishaps’ or pre planned Engineering Works.

    Like

Leave a reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑