In my Inbox

Thursday 28th May 2026

Time for another quick delve into my in-box and pull out a few of the many emails readers kindly send me with news, updates and comments.

It’s been all Go in Cumberland

First up is from Matthew Sutton, Strategic Lead, Bus Operations with Cumberland Council who contacted me with some interesting background to the ‘Cumberland Go’ network improvements I featured in a blog a couple of weeks ago.

Matthew explained….

“… firstly, as you know Cumbria hadn’t supported services since the early 2010’s. Most of the existing Public Transport staff provision transferred to Westmorland and Furness Council following Local Government Reorganisation in April 2023 which left us with antiquated systems and processes with no extra staff to get BSIP services started. We have been steadily building this up, but it has meant we have been on the backfoot with BSIP money to spend quickly.

“A large survey was undertaken regarding bus provision over Nov/Dec 2024  and was extended into Jan 2025 and we had nearly 2,900 responses. WSP ranked and analysed them, leaving us with a list of suggestions. Many we combined, putting them together and routes went out to tender. Stagecoach & Reays were both helpful at getting some services on the ground at short notice, but buses and drivers were needed overall into both companies, hence the staggered start dates when services could be resourced. Reays also had an order in for 3 small low floor buses with Ilesbus UK that strung them along since December. These buses still haven’t arrived, and they have recently had two further low floors off the road requiring engines. Hence, we have had find a temporary solution with Reays around the issue as you found recently. Absolutely not ideal but keeps the service operating.

“The HW1 numbers have increased in the last month and we are confident for a solid summer. Embarrassingly for me, a promotional video came out two weeks ago promoting the HW1 Cumberland Go #HW1 bus route. Two more have been filmed – Maryport services and also for the X7. The final video is being filmed this week regards the 600 and some other NHS related services. These are being edited and will be out in the next few weeks. The Cumberland Go bus seen in the film are for the buses for the Rural Mobility Fund DRT (launching later this year).

“Numbers are increasing steadily on all the services, although some still have a high subsidy per passenger trip. The 600 has been the standout, reaching 16k passenger trips in April (although 1/4 of this number was initially a Stagecoach commercial service between Carlisle & Cockermouth – we doubled the frequency and extended to Whitehaven). We are at about 34k passenger trips for April for all the new services and there is an upward trend to these as the first-year progresses. The other standout is the 22/22A service. It had been operating a timetable within schools at about 300 pax trips per month for the year before (previous BSIP). We changed the timetable to start earlier & finish later, visits to the hospital & Whitehaven and alternates the circuit of Cleator Moor & Egremont and is now 3,600 trips per month.

“We are struggling with roadside timetable publicity as the systems are old and complicated to maintain and use to get accurate timetables out. Just adding one NaPtan is quite the process and we are working on procuring software solutions to make sure we are fully accurate with all services in Cumberland. Having smaller operators not on EBSR also doesn’t help as manual excel timetables must be created to get them digitised. Our Contractor for timetables has also been down, leaving us struggling to cobble together a working system. Many digital bus stops needed switching on and creating for the new routes to be reinstated since they haven’t been used for years. Lots of the physical bus stops/flags etc have disappeared as well requiring replacements.

“We are also working at replacing 160 bus shelters and introducing RTPI, initially in high traffic areas and then cascading along the largest bus routes in Cumberland.

“We hope to start operating the Rural Mobility Fund DRT project in September – that has also been quite a slog to get going. I have modified our proposed DRT offering, creating regular timetables that the DRT element can divert off the main route by a maximum of 7 minutes one way (so the bus, with a 1 min boarding time, should only be a maximum of 15 minutes late to its next stops (if a DRT request is booked by 1600hrs the day before). I hope the timetabled routes will be of great benefit to the communities they serve where there has been no bus provision for many years.

“Anyway, I hope this helps fill in any gaps to your article.”

Many thanks to Matthew for reaching out and providing all this background and I look forward to a return visit to Cumberland later in the year to try out the interesting sounding DRT operation.

Is the HERT ‘Trackless Tram’ coming to Herts?

Regular correspondent John kindly sent me a report and photos from his visit to one of Hertfordshire County Council’s recent roadshows to promote its HERT (Hertfordshire Essex Rapid Transit) branded “trackless tram” which will criss-cross the County improving east-west links from Hemel Hempstead and Croxley/Watford with St Albans, Hatfield, Hertford and Harlow (in neighbouring Essex).

An image of the proposed route together with a sample Irizar ie-tram went on tour across the area. Cabinet Member for Transport, Councillor Paul Zukowskyj, says the scheme “could include separated busways, bus lanes, or traffic lights programmed to prioritise public transport” and be delivered in stages with an overall cost “in excess of £2 billion” adding “this vision isn’t something that’s going to be on the ground tomorrow. I would anticipate the full entirety of that might not be on the ground until 2040.”

Centre stage of the events was the Irizar vehicle which Cllr Zukowskyj describes “as feeling like a mix of bus, train and tram” but that the specific vehicles for HERT won’t be chosen until a later stage in the project.

Calling a bus a “trackless tram” is certainly a novel way of overcoming perceptions some people may have about a bus, but personally, for a journey across from Hemel Hempstead to Harlow, give me a double deck bus any day.

SWR – one year of Nationalisation

The DfT sent out a press release on Monday celebrating one year of public ownership of South Western Railways. It was almost all about the fact there’s 45 Class 701 Arterio trains in service. You know the ones – the fleet of 90 trains originally due into service back in 2019 so quite why we’re celebrating getting just half the fleet up and running when many have been languishing in sidings at great expense for years is beyond me. It’s a national embarrassment more than a celebration.

All the more so as this month’s inbox has featured blog readers encouraging me to take a few rides on the South Western network and sample the awful service for myself. Here’s one from Don…

“I don’t know if you’ve been following what has been going on with SW Trains but they’ve just had what must be their worst ever week. This  must be set in the context of a big feature in MR which boasts of improvement and how it will be maintained. My daughter travels daily to London by SW rail and my son twice a week to Winchester to College. It’s not just the last week but over many weeks. When things go wrong whatever the cause they simply cannot recover. Last week was an absolute disgrace. The causes may not have not have always down to them but what a total shambles.”

Then a couple of days later came a follow up…

“Tuesday was also bad due to power supply problems. Also not down to SW Trains but once again how they dealt with it. They simply cannot cope and recover from problems whereas Southern down here can and do even can Worse Late Western. My son was an hour late back from Winchester. But it’s on going. Hardly a day without issues. Daughter has had 17 delay repay claims this year. It is disrupting home and work life. This all suggests fundamental underlying problems with timetable and crew management.” 

Then, one more the next day….

“It continues. Daughter caught  a later train today, the 0738 Southampton Parkway. It was 38 late making extra stops. And so it goes on and on…….. it’s easier for her to get to her office in Chennai than London.”

I haven’t heard again from Don, but I have no reason to believe everything’s suddenly sorted.

MOORSBUZZ AT 45

Concluding this mini round up of inbox topics is some good news from the hard working people who oversee the wonderful Moorbus network. They kindly sent me their latest newsletter which reminds everyone the network organised entirely by volunteers is marking its 45th Anniversary this summer.

Now that is something to celebrate.

Roger French

Blogging timetable: 06:00 TThS

71 thoughts on “In my Inbox

Add yours

  1. The May Modern Railways issue has an interview with the SWR MD, where he talks about their forthcoming timetable review and the need to revise driver and guard diagrams to keep them on the same routes during their duty.

    I understand that, for reasons of economy, staff swop frequently between routes, which makes service recovery difficult. Now that the days of driver shortages seem to be (in general) in the past, just a couple of extra driver duties could make all the difference.

    I would point out that this isn’t just a SWR problem … from my recent travels, Thameslink and LNwR suffer just as badly, with relatively minor service perturbations taking several hours to resolve.

    Something for GBR to sort out, mayhap?? And something sortable relatively quickly??

    Like

  2. Good morning Roger Many thanks for your latest blog. Having been a frequent traveller on South Western Railway (“SWR”) for many years, I read the press release marking one year of public ownership with incredulity. Punctuality and reliability of services has deteriorated in recent years and infrastructure problems with signalling systems, point failures and speed restrictions etc. are a daily occurrence.  I recently asked the wife of a Bournemouth based SWR train driver about the current state of the railway. She said her husband was fed up with having to cover for other drivers who were skiving and nothing gets repaired until it is broken. SWR’s record on the provision of toilet facilities at stations is particularly dismal, including at busy stations like Southampton Central, where cubicles are frequently closed awaiting repairs. At Waterloo last week the queue for the Ladies stretched all the way up the stairs on to the concourse! Lift repairs also appear to be a low priority. The overall impression is of a railway where saving money takes priority over everything else. Anything you are able to do to highlight some of these issues in future blogs would be much appreciated.   Kind regards Ian (Bournemouth)

    Yahoo Mail: Search, organise, conquer

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I’m quite surprised that Hertfordshire County Council chose to make their “trackless tram” map using the Tennesine metro maker software. I suppose that it is free, although I find Tennesine unsuitable for supposedly professional maps.

    Like

  4. “Trackless trams” – Ipswich had them in 1923 – they were trolleybuses! Incidentally Ipswich trolleybus no.2, in the town’s excellent transport museum, is believed to be the oldest complete and restored trolleybus on display in the world!

    Like

    1. “Trackless trams” – Ipswich had them in 1923 – they were trolleybuses!

      I was going to comment about trackless trams being trolleybuses, although I was thinking of Yorkshire where the term was common.

      I don’t suppose whoever came up with trackless trams as a snazzy marketing phrase realised that there’s very little new under the sun!

      Like

  5. Back to the last dire days of BR?

    Do we not know what’s inevitable and coming soon and “soon to be rolled out across the whole country!” with their State ruled colour branding spending billions to do it . Lose all the local brands and feeling which largely happy staff now with team feelings on stations from LNER Darlington to GWR Bath , to Avanti Lancaster and much more .

    No accountability and staff can do or not do what they like and as it’s one big mass. And more so in the unseen on board staff who can just not turn up and the like and send hundreds of us into days of loss and hassle.

    Mrs T and her team, possibly knew something key. Though implementation was then rather too ill thought out .

    And when the State rules the data we get to see for performance can we be sure how SWR are really doing now and as time heads on.?

    Worrying times and with potential further Left wing, unreal world?, PM over us all soon? What will that mean for it all.

    What can we do to try and keep it in the correct places of good remaining & direction going ? ??

    Thanks! Roger, and others, David

    Like

    1. Dont forget SWR introductions of Arterios were under private contract , agreed ( change of contractor ) by the DfT. The DfT could have had a different contract , but the Nationalised management has sorted the issues ( pragmatically resolved, apparently) that delayed the longer trains with onboard WCs which for the Suburbans are a big improvement. Altons, Windsors and Readings need a bit more improvment and anything West of Basingstoke is going to need govt money to improve rail reliability,

      JBC Prestatyn

      Like

    2. During its final year’s, British Rail got its act together and the service it provided improved. The creation of sectors with strong brands – notably InterCity, Network SouthEast, Railfreight focussing on their markets – turned BR into quite a successful operator.

      That all got sacrificed on the altar of privatisation. Not by Mrs T, the railways being one of very few nationalised industries she didn’t dare sell off, but by her successor, John Major. And what a dog’s breakfast his government made of it!

      Malc M

      Liked by 1 person

    3. If going back to the “dire days of BR” means I can get a seat on the train and don’t have to worry about having the wrong sort of ticket then bring it on!

      i also wonder how the “happy team” of Avanti staff at Lancaster feel about the fact that most of the trains at that station are run by Northern and TPE. From my observations they seem equally committed to efficient operation of every train there so would fit quite happily into GBR

      Jim Davies

      Lancaster

      Liked by 2 people

    4. It wasn’t Mrs T who privatised the railways. BR was not “dire” in its last days. It was great value for the taxpayer, compared with the massive subsidies that privatisation required. Does no-one remember the disaster that was Railtrack?

      SWT services suffered immediately from being privatised because Stagecoach thought that fewer drivers was a good way to increase profits!

      Liked by 2 people

  6. And yes ! to this matter as another Commenter speaks. The number of times one is on board a train and we are told “Sorry we are having to wait for our driver who is coming on a train which is late “. Growing number of times and seems rather mad to we folk on board, one thinks. And is quite off putting.

    15 to 20 minutes at Leeds on Transpennine Newcastle to Liverpool Victoria on Tuesday midday, and 20 minutes at Bristol Temple Meads waiting on the 1930 dep for London Paddington yesterday for example.

    But do we have national data on this. How much it is happening and why and as the commenter suggested it could be solved and maybe will be fairly soon and wider?

    Like

  7. Staggers me that there was no Cumbria funding and all buses that ran were commercial. Makes Surrey a shining light: after deregulation Surrey did have Sunday services with a 120 headway through Hersham on its two routes. Gladly I had my motorcycle era then. Routes with the 5xx series were Surrey routes. 511 Sundays only was a queer fish. LCBS (WY) between Kingston and Thorpe Park. Travelcards and Bus Passes accepted throughout, even the out county part west of Hampton. My Walton on Thames shuttle 564 is Surrey funded and through BSIP has had a very pleasant timetable tweak. 60 but standard throughout the day rather than having queer 90 minute gaps during the afternoon.

    Like

    1. Re Cumbria – cost saving. All subsidised services went over 2 years sometime between 2011 and 2015. Other councils are the same. There was no legal requirement so to save costs, the subsidised services went.

      And also they award school contracts without reference to the fact that where the contract was with Stagecoach it also helped another Stagecoach service run commercially in between the school runs.

      Northumberland did something similar with school bus contracts – they did a big review around costs and if you were not entitled to a free school bus but had a place on a Northumberland school bus contract (and paid) then you lost out. This is one reason why we now have some double deckers on the 685 Carlisle to Newcastle ( and the double deckers stay out all day. Suddenly, Autumn term 2018, lots of school pupils had to use the 685 and the single deckers became absolutely rammed such that on day 2 of the change lots of parent complained to the effect “last term we had seat on a Northumberland school bus so why do we have to stand on a commercial service” – Arriva (who shared the service at the time) and Stagecoach changed the bus allocation within 1 week.

      Like

  8. ” Drivers skiving ” earlier comment!?

    Where are we heading and can it be addressed if we are ?

    Left wing Worker’s Rights Bill going too far or in wrong ways

    = now means , such staff can’t be attended to kindly, as they should be ? A nightmare becoming for any managers??

    The unreal world to solve the problems we agree on, of left wing or too far left politics?.

    The boss sacked me times past for excuses and not doing as I had to.

    It was a lesson I had to learn and take as I had to. And I was due it !

    The idea of no taxes on overtime might be rather simplistic motivation in the other direction, and unworkable maybe but an idea in the right direction ..??

    …. But being docked pay for skiving, the other way, will now not be possible due to ‘worker’s rights’!??

    Like

    1. I suggest you actually read the Employment Rights Act, to give it its correct title. Then you might be more than a little embarrassed at the fantastical nonsense you’ve posted.

      Bob

      Liked by 1 person

  9. I’m still not sure how the governments promises of better and more reliable services will every be achieved especially when the same management running the trains day to day and the dead hand of the DfT at the helm. And when money is tight will the NHS or schools or defence get priority?

    Like

    1. Well the private railway was mostly subsidised and more per passenger than BR days so you are running a false flag. Or is it a Straw Man? Anyway you are mistaken.

      Like

  10. SWR MD (and Director of Network Rail Wessex) also in Green Signals interview. Does say new management at different levels has been brought in and different Driver/Crew patterns applied. Thankfully for me a couple of weeks ago late running Winchesters meant I could get my train to Hook after I too was running late at Waterloo. (and are there WCs on the Waterloo East Platforms one can use? ) (or even travel up and back to Charing Cross.

    Herts/Essex looks rather like a Green Line coach service Hemel Harlow

    JBC Prestatyn

    Like

    1. There are toilets in Waterloo’s Sidings shopping centre under the old international platforms. When the existing Waterloo toilets were recently being rebuilt, those in the Sidings were signposted from the concourse.

      Like

  11. Over 15 years ago SWT (then under Stagecoach management) praised their ‘alliance’ with NR which was supposed to bring improvements. It didn’t ! Track circuit failures persisted. SWT did run a more reliable service though and cancellations got worse under SWR and haven’t improved since nationalisation. The new timetable is now ‘delayed’ until 2027 so a while before pre COVID services are restored

    Martin W

    Liked by 1 person

    1. The SWR-Network Rail alliance did bring improvements, most obviously so in capital works. All the Waterloo short number platforms were extended under that alliance so allowing inner suburban trains to be doubled in length.

      The bringing into use of the old international station was most probably started in that period too.

      Like

  12. SWR is a mess and the statistics show that late trains and cancellations are significantly up since nationalisation. I’m pretty sure these understate the seriousness of the decline given that the West of England line was run on an emergency timetable for most of last summer so the loss of 50% of its services disappeared out of the numbers.

    It’s pretty evident that the new leadership team (every single one of whom are either new or in a different role to previously) don’t have any kind of grip on the day-to-day running of the company. Fixing simple issues like minor repairs to stations and programming PIS systems not to bombard passengers with irrelevant information seem beyond them. They are making some of the right long term noises, e.g. about fixing the crew rostering situation, but as another poster has pointed out anyone talking to frontline staff would be well aware that moralle is falling.

    The recent media activity from the Department boasting about the first year of nationalisation comes across as tone-deaf at best, and delusional at worst.

    Like

    1. programming PIS systems not to bombard passengers with irrelevant information seem beyond them.

      It is beyond them. They’re complying with instructions from the DfT, which get more onerous every year.

      Don’t worry; as the old Russian saying has it: “And then things got worse”.

      Like

    2. I dont know if the present Network Rail Wessex directorship covers the entire route to Waterloo (was Surrey ever in Wessex historically). Today track issues I think in New Malden area led to delays and cancellations until about 1659 on much of the suburban route. I am not sure if re-routing some trains to elsewhere other than diverting Kingston Loop to Hounslow Loop/Shepperton was/is possible in these situations. Planned (?) engineering announced for New Malden too for Sat 30th but at least rail replacement around that can be planned along with routing mainline differently too into Waterloo

      JBC Prestatyn

      Like

  13. The prospect of articulated buses running between Hemel Hempstead & Harlow may look appealing but as Roger alluded, a double decker would be far better given the views afforded from the top deck of the wonderful countryside it would transverse. Furthermore, double deckers don’t take up as much road space & are easier to park at bus stops. I can well imagine an articulated bus not being able to draw up properly at typical town & village bus stops due to either poorly parked cars or delivery vans.
    I understand why Hert would appeal to a marketing consultant but will the people of Hertfordshire (Herts) or Essex necessarily relate to it?

    I know the vehicle photographed is only a demonstrator but who thought that brown seats are appealing? As for the projected cost of implementing the project being in excess of £2billion, Mr Zukowskyj & his team need to get their heads out of the clouds!

    Like

    1. I would hope that a properly implemented BRT would have stops and highway modifications designed to be compatible with the proposed articulated “trackless trams”. The temptation with these schemes is to start with the claim that it will be as good as a tram buy cheaper. Then they will gradually strip out the infrastructure element (the crucial bit enabling a higher level of service than a bus) to save money, leaving a sub optimal offering that will be a bus with a fancy livery, but not much else. The public will see it for what it is, just a bus.

      Peter Brown

      Liked by 1 person

  14. As regards SWR, we still need our Epsom line peak hour extras reinstated. They have not been reinstated since Covid cuts. Ewell West & Stoneleigh only get a half hourly service in the peaks. Motspur Park has two twenty four minute gaps between trains in peaks. restoring the Epsom -Waterloo shorts will provide a train ever 15 minds at Ewell West and Stoneleigh, and and extra two trins per hour at Motspur Park, Raynes Park, & Earlsfield.

    Like

    1. Quick reply because I have to prepare to catch the bus. We only have one a week and are eight miles from the nearest rail station. Forgive my lack of sympathy.

      Liked by 1 person

          1. And I’m expressing my opinion that “because X village gets one bus a week the ECML should only have one train an hour” type posts are not helping anyone. We should be trying to improve public transport everywhere not just saying “well it could be worse”

            Liked by 2 people

        1. It just amuses me to read of people complaining that trains only run at half hourly frequencies (or, in the post I was commenting on, 24 minute frequencies). It is somewhat urbancentric.

          When I can get to a station trains are every hour – or 50 minutes between the first two of the day.

          And, in good news, two new passengers on the bus today.

          Like

  15. As a long-suffering SWR user and someone who supports the overall aims of the restructuring of the railways I have to say that things have got worse on SWR over the past year.

    Yes, we’ve got new trains, but they were coming anyway. Recovery from major disruption is just as dire, if not worse, and apparently we’ve got to wait another two years for that to improve. It feels no one is in charge. One of the worst aspects is running trains fast to make up time straight after a huge gap in service.

    What has really got worse is daily disruption through random cancellations and the increasing tendency to skip stations for the most minor late running.

    There is zero consideration of the passenger impact when such “control” decisions are made. Clearly it’s purely to make the performance statistics look good. Passengers are just an irrelevance.

    Steve

    Like

    1. No, you’re not alone. Like most articulated buses they’re better suited to those countries where roads are straighter & wider than those usually found in the U.K.

      Like

        1. The fact is that the British, in the main, prefer to sit in their double deckers rather than stand like many of our continental cousins in their articulated buses. They were tried here if you recall & apart from Red Arrow services in London (where they proved very adept at sweeping up large numbers of people travelling between stations), they were rejected, just like the EU.

          Like

          1. @Anonymous, 29/5 13:23 – articulated buses were rejected… by who?

            Their removal in London was a political decision by a Mayor who seemed to offer little other than gimmicks. Aha, you might say, but the people of London voted him into power. And so they did. However, it was in outer London, where articulated buses generally didn’t operate, where he got most of his support. In the inner London boroughs, where articulated buses operated, he got far less support (Ken Livingstone won the vote in the inner boroughs, but that was more than offset by the result in the outer boroughs).

            If you think people generally prefer to sit in double-deckers, perhaps you don’t use buses much (at least in London), where it is very easy to find double-deckers running around full to standing on the lower deck, but the upper deck mostly empty. Passengers travelling short distances, or carrying heavy shopping/luggage or with young children (maybe in a buggy), or who are frail or less mobile, are less likely to want to go up a flight of stairs.

            Malc M

            Liked by 1 person

  16. As a footnote its Goodbye & Good Riddance to GO AHEAD GROUP operating trains in the UK with the end of the GOVIA franchise.

    In the 29 years of its existence it cheated the tax payer out of £64m & was fined a penalty notice of £23.5m

    I am amazed how many run to the defence of GO AHEAD as it was caught red handed with its hand in the till.

    If as a accountant I was party to a fraud of this level I would be struck off by my institute.

    Imagine the reaction of the so called armchair bus enthusiasts if Rotala had cheated HM Government out of £64m……….

    Like

        1. Not in East Anglia they didn’t. Don’t recall them doing that well in Birmingham 20+ years ago. Richard Jones may wish to comment further on Birmingham.

          Like

          1. Go Ahead bought the Birmingham Coach Company from Geoff Howle.

            They completely misjudged the Brum bus market & axed most of BBC DIAMOND routes.

            After a £1m write off on its Balance Sheet they sold the business onto Rotala

            Having seen the disaster in the West Midlands this why I dont rate Go Ahead- Quite simply it was a laughing stock in Brum.

            Liked by 1 person

            1. Richard – You can’t still be living in the past? The Go West Midlands episode was more than EIGHTEEN years ago. It may live rent free in your head but very few people have little recollection of this footnote in history.

              Since then, Go Ahead has very successfully ousted First from Plymouth, and then from Cornwall. They ousted First from Southampton, put Yellow Buses to the sword in Bournemouth, are still the leading contractor to the London bus market, have won one of the first franchise awards in Liverpool City Region, and have won large amounts of the Bee Network operations in Manchester including in tranche 1, taking the majority of Rotala’s work.

              I will agree with the other poster’s sentiment on Go East Anglia which was a shoddy, mismatched and ill advised foray.

              BW2

              Liked by 2 people

            2. If you bothered to read a previous post

              I was asked by poster to comment on GO AHEAD in the West Midlands which I gladly did.

              If you do not like hearing the truth then that is a matter for you & not me.

              As far as I am concerned GO AHEAD GROUP is organisation that cheated the tax payer whilst holding a rail franchise & couldn’t operate a sucessfull company in the 2nd City & are frankly laughable.

              As I have posted previously I am very happy with the current operations of Diamond Bus under Rotala.

              Like

            3. I can’t reply to BW2 as there is no option.

              The two examples I mentioned are ones known to me. When Go Ahead bought BCC I was working in Walsall. If I recall correctly, they also bought Pete’s Travel – which may not have been a good idea. The result was an absolute mess.

              I now live in Norfolk. Here they purchased Konect and Anglian. They also purchased in Essex. There seemed to be no investment in vehicles at all and, unsurprisingly complaints escalated. I was down in Frinton on Sea last weekend and the vehicles being operated by the successor operator were an absolute mess – but they did run.

              The successor purchaser will need deep pockets to sort out what they have to sort out. Simonds have evidence of new vehicles and the very old ones that have arrived to have the benefit of paint.

              Meanwhile Sanders have bought Semmence and taken on a few of their vehicles – with the rest having a fairly obvious final journey.

              Like

            4. Richard – I did read the post; I just didn’t realise you did requests. It is now really ancient history nonetheless.

              BW2

              Like

            5. Just sitting on Diamond 4H so am always happy to comment on the history & workings of this excellent company proudly serving Brum & Black Country for 40 years albeit aside from the GO WEST MIDLANDS shambolic fiasco which reflects my view of GO AHEAD GROUP.

              Like

            6. Glad you’re enjoying the 4H.

              Obviously, you were very fortunate to live in the West Midlands, and not Worcestershire when Diamond’s operations were in trouble with the Traffic Commissioner. If we’re recalling the world of 2008 earlier, then it seems that we can refer to public enquiries of 2014, 2016 and 2018, and before there’s any weaseling of saying it’s the West Midlands and not Worcestershire… Same business, same operators license.

              Perhaps things that happened in the past don’t necessarily have relevance in the current, businesses can change, and that what may happen in one geographic and business area may not be reflective of an organisation in totality.

              BW2

              Like

          2. No worries Andrew – the West Midlands episode is ancient history. They bought BCC which was requiring significant investment but rather foolishly decided to then purchase Probus (aka Pete’s Travel) and integrate it into the other business. Probus was a basket case and they expended no end of time and money on something that was never going to be a coherent business.

            The Go East Anglia one is more problematic. They were essentially four decent businesses that were welded into one, were systemically underinvested in and had corporate overheads foisted upon them. The comments on fleet age, condition, service reliability and general mismanagement aren’t areas that anyone can argue against. You’ll not find me saying otherwise.

            However, if you were to pick the best bus companies in the UK, you’d be looking at Metrobus, Brighton and Hove, Go South Coast including the superb Southern Vectis. Also, they were very good in their execution of Tranche 1 of the Bee Network in Manchester, successfully TUPE transferring staff from Stagecoach and Diamond NW, took on Southampton and Bournemouth (at the drop of a hat when Yellow Buses failed), took on Cornwall’s tender package and then dislodged the incumbents (First) that were failing and then took on the operations there.

            We can all point to the outliers and exceptions. Rotala is a much improved operation and has made good purchases but remember when they bought Johnson’s operations (declaring to the AIM to it would be a key strategic purchase and would add £200k p.a. to the bottom line) only for the operations to be wound up in months as they lost the tenders? Sometimes, you make a mistake. Sometimes, there are outliers.

            However, the general consensus is that, taken in the round, Go Ahead are one of the best and most successful bus operators in the UK.

            BW2

            ps I’m not a shareholder in Go Ahead and never have been, nor have I ever been employed by them. However, the characterisation of Go Ahead just seems alien to those of us who’ve travelled on them elsewhere.

            Liked by 1 person

            1. I can only comment on what I see. Yes, Southern Vectis is very good indeed. Have rellies who live in Bournemouth and that is also good. Perhaps they see me coming and dump the rubbish in my way!

              Like

    1. @Richard Jones – I think you are being premature there.

      Go-Ahead are partners in the operation of TfL’s Elizabeth Line. The contract runs until 2032 at the earliest.

      Malc M

      Like

      1. I acknowledge Sctm Rail Holdings Limited who are owned by Sumitomo Corporation & Tokyo Metro in a joint venture with Go Ahead Group with regard to GTS RAIL OPERATIONS LIMITED operating the Elizabeth Line for TfL

        My comments were in regard to GOVIA whose franchise concludes this weekend.

        I am happy to correct this information if I am wrong on this.

        Like

  17. I’m glad to hear that the new SWR management are aiming to improve crew diagrams to avoid delays due to ‘crew being delayed’. That is one thing. But the overall upbeat story put out does suggest someone is ‘out of touch’. The first key target was clearly just to get enough 701s in service so as to get rid of the 455s. But as others have commented other problems are more serious. The daily signal failures (admittedly this is down to Network Rail, but the new boss is supposed to be looking at both together?) need serious action. There is rarely a day without some problem, especially between Waterloo and Clapham Junction. As also commented on, the apparently random and chaotic skipping of stations, after the slightest delay, needs to change. I get the impression this is remote management carried on from the previous era, which cares nothing for passengers, just meeting performance targets.Then there is the general carelessness that results in incorrect as well as unhelpful announcements. For example, trains heading south calling at Surbiton all announce, twice, that Oyster and Freedom Passes are not valid beyond there, even on trains to Hampton Court, where they continue to be valid as it is in Zone 6. Also automatically announced stopping patterns which are wrong, particularly during the frequent changes at weekends.

    Like

  18. I was reading this monthly publication booklet for my town. I saw a local bus operators advertisement. Listed all their routes that go to my town but missed one out.

    Like

  19. The Hertfordshire trackless tram is another bit of ‘pie in the sky’ unless it is accompanied by very significant bus priority in the congested towns it will travel through. Politicians are just not brave enough to introduce them and upset motorists and shopkeepers. Passenger numbers will only significantly increase if buses get priority, and the opposite is true as shown in London where as bus speeds decrease when road space is removed for cycle lanes , passenger number plummet.

    Bus Rapid Transit is a much better and cheaper solution than trams, as shown in nearby Luton where a bus every 12 minutes between Dunstable and Luton has been replaced by buses up to every 4 minutes on the Busway with capacity issues at peak.

    Liked by 1 person

  20. £2B for trackless buses does not sound to be a sensible investment. To justify it the passenger numbers would need to be massive but I doubt the demand would be very high. The road network as well is ill suited to these asrtculated buses

    In the distant past there was a rail service from Hertford to St Albans

    Like

  21. An example yesterday on SWR where management have really not appreciated that their train service is prone to regular interruptions and that more resilient rostering of units is desperately needed. I caught the 14.50 Salisbury train from Waterloo. It had two coaches (intentionally so according to the guard)! Rostering any train shorter than 4 coaches from Waterloo is operational insanity, and always has been.

    What the bean counters had not allowed for is that the previous Salisbury service had been cancelled from Waterloo, and the intended units had turned round at Basingstoke (due to level crossing problems further west). Due to SWR’s freaky timetabling, the 14.50 is the first fast train to Basingstoke after that cancelled 14.20. There are 4 off-peak fast trains per hour Waterloo to Basingstoke, but they’re all packed into the 30 minutes up to xx.20.

    So, it was packed and almost unendurably hot. So much so that passengers were left behind at Woking.

    Routinely adding on a 3-coach 159 to the rostered 2-coach 158 would have allowed for the high likelihood of disruption and saved an enormous amount of discomfort and passenger discontent.

    Liked by 1 person

  22. Some clarification on the number of SWR class 701 trains in service. At the time of writing there are 45 trains out in service each day, all 10 cars, from a pool of 50 available for service. The fleet is made up of 60 10-car and 30 5-car trains. So that is 750 carriages in total, 450 in use each day from a possible 500. Which makes 60% in service and 67% which can be used.

    This has enabled the withdrawal of the final un-airconditioned class 455 trains just in time for the latest heatwave!

    Of course they were very late into service due to various issues, but since these have been sorted the rollout has gone quite quickly.

    Phil

    Like

  23. I wish local authorities and bus companies stop using the words “trackless tram” as that is not possible. The definition of the word tram is “a passenger vehicle powered by electricity obtained from an overhead cable, and running on rails laid in a public road.” I realise that trams can also obtain power through a conduit but they MUST run on rails/track to be a tram.

    Like

    1. Almost correct, but remember the term tram was also used when they were originally hauled by horses. The problem is that we’re often dealing in this country with marketing consultants that love creating these names whilst being ignorant themselves of transport history & generic terms. But like you, I do love a good rail!

      Liked by 1 person

  24. Last Saturday 23rd May, the points failed just beyond Fratton, locked in the direction towards Southampton. Lots of people wanted to get back to London after visiting Portsmouth or the Isle of Wight. Good on SWT control, who “commandeered” a 10 coach train, and sent it to London, non-stop (except Woking), up via Winchester. Also good on the guard too, for warning everyone that it was an unscheduled train, so “we’ll get stuck behind everything – expect a long journey – but we should make it”.

    All entertaining stuff for a day trip out, and total disbelief by Chinese visitors, who of course, are told everything just works in the West. This would drive me nuts, however, if I had to face that sort of thing every day with SWT.

    Like

  25. Since this is a “bit of everything” post..

    I noticed a few months back that the London and Southeast rail service poster (commonly displayed in train stations in former NSE area) now includes some routes where through tickets on buses are available.

    Except when you look closer, they aren’t always (even considering PlusBus).

    Example: Fakenham in Norfolk. What’s the CRS code for that? Doesn’t exist! Not bootable on any train website. And also some strange mapping. What the heck is going on here!

    one of the routes has historically been a rail bus since BR days: peterboro..Lynn..wisbech..Dereham (and Dereham has CRS..DEB.. and you can see timetable on realtime trains). I think the express buses from stansted down towards Chelmsford? also have a rail bus legacy but fewer digital footprints (and aren’t mapped).

    milest

    Like

  26. Last (and only!) word goes to Moorsbus. Congrats and my thanks to all those over the years making it happen, and publicising it so professionally ( great example of how volunteers do a much better job than bus companies / transport authorities ).

    Highly recommend the service to explore the delightful villages, towns and countryside of the North York Moors area.

    Paul Kirby

    Like

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑