Saturday 6th June 2026

Following my recent blog about the Section 106 Developer funded route to Leigh Green Garden Village in Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire, (and references to new route 33 in anoher recent blog being Developer funded) I’m again on the Developer Funded Bus Route trail and this time in neighbouring Cambridgeshire.

And once again it’s another route operated by that ever expanding company, Central Connect, and it’s yet another route 100 to add to my collection blogged about in 2024 albeit this one escaped that scrutiny as it only started last July.

It serves the huge new residential development at Waterbeach which will see the existing village more than double in size over the next 20 years and become what is being called a New Town. Along with the new bus route there are also plans for a new railway station (on the Cambridge to Ely line) to be sited about a mile and a half north of the existing station which is closer to the new development but further away from the existing village.
Construction of the ‘New Town’ is already well under way – it’s on the site of a huge former barracks and disused airfield.

Reading the inspirational online marketing descriptions of how living will be transformed for those who move to Waterbeach as well as watching the video content it sounds such a wonderful and idyllic place to live but I hope no one is banking on the new railway station opening in 2027 as featured in the write up.

That’s not going to happen as no work has yet started although South Cambridgeshire District Council Planning Committee has approved plans to move the station including provision of “a shuttle bus between the Village and the relocated Station” – it’ll be interesting to see how long that lasts before no doubt being ditched or maybe incorporated into a Tiger branded DRT.

But in the meantime new residents moving in have route 100 to take them either to the site of the existing station in Waterbeach village or through to Cambridge with a half hour journey time. And, an extensive operating day too, from 05:50 to 23:30 with a slightly later start on Saturday (06:30) and Sunday (08:20). Such is the luxury of developer funding.

A half hourly frequency is operated with the route requiring three buses with Sundays having an hourly frequency.

The route begins at Cambridge Research Park before crossing the A10 and passing through a bus only access road on to the former Airfield and Barracks site which will eventually be transformed into a country park, schools, employment space and all those new homes.

After passing through the existing village of Waterbeach the bus continues via Horningsea and Fen Ditton into Cambridge.

It’s quite a novel experience travelling through the former Barracks and then across an old Airfield…

… as although some work has been done to create leisure spaces, there’s still much development work to be done and it does feel like passing through a giant construction site.

Not surprisingly on my late morning journey from Cambridge we didn’t carry any passengers to or from the terminus at the Research Park with the last of seven passengers alighting at the southern end of the development area. Five of the other passengers had alighted on the route out of Cambridge (two), in Fen Ditton (two), Horningsea (one) and Waterbeach old village (one).

The Research Park is also served by a bespoke minibus shuttle service although there wasn’t any information at the bus stop to tell any potential users where it will shuttle you to.

I guess Research businesses and companies based in the Park let their employees know direct. There was a timetable for the Central Connect 100…

… and also a timetable for a supposedly jointly operated route 9 (between Stagecoach and A2B Travel) which links the Research Centre with Cambridge via the Science Park taking 26 minutes.

However, it looked to me as though the display was out of date not only showing incorrect times but also I can’t see any evidence on Stagecoach’s website it operates journeys on the route. While I was there at 12:44 an A2B Travel bus heading towards Cambridge passed through – despite the timetable display saying it should have been a Stagecoach bus at 12:14 – so all very confusing.

I returned to Cambridge on the 100 leaving at 12:45 as we retraced the route across the former airfield reaching what is being called a “sustainable travel hub”…

… by the new development already occupied with residents.

Continuing south through the former barracks there’s much construction work taking place for the new residents to transform their lives and make Waterbeach their new home.

Back in the old village, as we passed one of the other two buses on the route with just a couple of passengers on board, we picked a passenger up who travelled just down the road to Horningsea and later in Fen Ditton another passenger boarded travelling to the Retail Park by a large Tesco on the way into Cambridge city centre.

It was good to see Central Connect has produced an easy to follow timetable leaflet with route map and had supplies available on the bus.

And it was also noticeable how the road surface though the new development was to a high standard so hopefully in the years to come there won’t be an issue with pot holes.

It was encouraging to see a bus service at an attractive frequency already in place before thousands of residents move in but it will be interesting to see what happens when the developer funding runs out. That’s because the original part of Waterbeach enjoys a frequent link into Cambridge thanks to Stagecoach’s route PR5 – the Park & Ride route which serves the Milton Park & Ride site to the north of the city every half an hour and from where alternate buses continue north to serve Landbeach and Waterbeach on a clockwise circuit as shown in red on the map below, compared to route 100 shown in blue.

The green route was the Combined Authority funded route 19A operated by A2B Travel which used to run two journeys a day between Landeach, Waterbeach, Horningsea and Fen Ditton into Cambridge. It was one of the routes on the Combined Authority’s hit list for withdrawal not least as it became superfluous following the arrival of route 100 and with inbound journeys at 06:50 and 09:30 and return from Cambridge at 12:30 and 17:55 it’s not surprising it carried on average less than half a passenger per journey. It met its fate yesterday, when it ran for the last time and is now withdrawn.
A review of both route PR5 and 100 would seem sensible once more residents have moved in and the ‘New Town’ of Waterbeach is more established, along with that new railway station.
Roger French
Revised blogging timetable: 06:00 TThSSu. As it’s June, the BusAndTrainUser enhanced blogging timetable returns for the 2026 summer season with summer Su blogging commencing from tomorrow.

The reduction in competition in Berkshire continues with Reading announcing that service 12 to Twyford (previously blogged about here) is to be withdrawn. Hard to be sorry about this since it added little to the network and risked undermining the through route to Henley. Pink 22 from Reading to Caversham Heights which has been a financial problem for Reading for decades also finally ends. Based on past experience of Caversham, there will be another petition against its cancellation signed by loads of people who if they actually used the service would be enough to make it profitable. This one does leave quite a significant area away from the X40 unserved.
https://www.reading-buses.co.uk/service-revisions-mon-20-july
LikeLike
When the Caversham Heights service was last proposed for withdrawal there was a 600 name petition calling for it to be retained. Clearly few, if any, of the signatories actually used the reprieved service!
see https://www.getreading.co.uk/news/reading-berkshire-news/people-told-use-caversham-buses-13933729.amp
LikeLike
Going by Bud Times just A2B now operates the 9
LikeLike
There’s no beach at High Beach in the Epping Foreat either.
john
LikeLike
As part of the extensive house building where I live, we have Top Farm, Callendar Farm, Heritage Fields, Yew Tree Park, Yew Tree Meadows, Sketchley Meadows, Meadow Green and Lockley Gardens amongst many others. None of them are actually farms, greens or meadows any more as they’ve built houses on them!
LikeLike
It seems to be standard practice that developments are named after the features that were destroyed to make way for them.
LikeLike
Maybe that’s because it’s High Beech, appropriate for a forest setting perhaps!
LikeLike
That is because it is High Beech (not Beach), presumably with beech trees and it is higher than the surrounding area.
LikeLike
And continuing from the above coordination in Maidenhead has improved where Thames Valley withdraw their 20 service between Maidenhead and High Wycombe and Carousel also withdrawing a competing route, with Carousels Maidenhead to High Wycombe service increased to every 30 minutes , and most importantly some acceptance of each others tickets. This brings sanity to Maidenhead, courtesy of the two Local Authorities who are supporting the improved services.
Will this sanity now extend to the Slough/Windsor area and will First be involved?
LikeLike
Mixed views of this as a Maidenhead local.
Removal of the 20 is annoying as there’s now no direct service to Flackwell Heath (37 has also been rerouted on Sundays), but the increase to 30min is welcome. Annoyingly that’s only M-F, not Sat when I use it most… and I still want a later last service south from Wycombe.
Woodlands Park change is good, it’s the one part of town where a commercial service is viable and ridership is clearly increasing. I wish one an hour continued to White Waltham but you can’t have everything.
16 removed on Sundays is very annoying, it’s much faster than the 37.
704 is the major success, I’m very glad to see it run into the evenings and on Sundays. Heathrow refuse to subsidise a service to Maidenhead despite supporting every other westbound local route, so to have this work out anyway is a major credit for TV and the local authority.
LikeLike
All the new housing developments you visit seem to have the same kind of architecture: Brookleigh, Waterbeach and the development around Springfield Hospital in London.
LikeLike
The route gained specially branded new volvos a few weeks ago too…
LikeLike
Good to see that Central Connect have produced proper timetable booklets for the route. In Leicester they are the only operator in the city to give out timetable booklets for their ND (Nova Direct) route. Major operators First, Arriva and Stagecoach in the city offer no printed timetables at all.
Paul from Leicester
LikeLike
Dear Roger,
I believe ‘Stagecoach’, don’t operate Service 9 anymore, and the contract was passed to ‘A2B Travel’, as they wished to run the Service, and Stagecoach didn’t.
Stagecoach run the ‘PR5’ – Park & Ride 5 – from the City Centre to Landbeach/Waterbeach.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Ben.
LikeLike
Another interesting report Roger. Like all these new home developments where the likes of Central Connect see a potential market for their services, a lot more effort needs to made to attract the residents out of their cars. Social media is one way given that most of the residents will be social media savvy but wondering out loud, I wonder if a Jeremy Clarkson type approach might work. The TV companies are always seeking out new formats & opportunities, so what about a programme dedicated to travel by bus or train whereby all potential beneficiaries are involved. The question then is, what well known celebrity with enthusiasm for bus/train travel, as well as excellent business connections, could be approached?
LikeLike
If you really want to see what happens when the BBC throw a good few million pounds at showing off an urban transport scheme, then this is absolutely fantastic.
Go on to YouTube, and in the search box, put “Tyne and Wear Metro the Musical BBC Newcastle”
My vote is something similar should happen in Oxford when the Botley Road bridge opens!
(CH, Oxford).
LikeLike
Are you suggesting that Roger dons pastel colours and appears on BBC2 as the bus travellers’ answer to Michel Portillo?
RW, Cambs
LikeLike
Good to see a decent level of provision before the development is completed. Weaning people away from their cars is difficult anywhere, perhaps particularly so in what appears to be a semi-rural area. And it looks as if the road layout will be public-transport friendly. Round here (Harrogate) we have seen numerous developments where there is no through route for cars, let alone buses. That simply says “don’t live here without a car” and the public battle is lost before it even starts.
John
LikeLike
Planners and developers have no excuse. This publication – Bus Services & New Residential Developments (2nd edition) – produced jointly by Go-Ahead, Stagecoach and Bus Centre of Excellence has been around in one form or another for eight years.
LikeLike
I would suggest that “a review of both route PR5 and 100 would seem sensible” should be “would have been sensible before the route started”. Just because the S106 money is separate, really doesn’t justify the wasteful over-provison overall.
LikeLike
The PR5 looks like it should be extended over the 19A’s former loop in Waterbeach which is a bit off the 100 route as such. As to if / also it should go to the Science Park to give say a even 15 min departures into Cambridge may be worth a thought. The 19A also seemed to give Fen Ditton and south east of Cambridge some kind of service is that now covered by other route/s
One assumes for the 100 peak and school journeys are going to have better loadings than the not bad for time of day ones Roger found
JBC Prestatyn
LikeLike
Looks like the new Waterbeach station is going to be on a straighter part of the line allowing I guess for longer trains and faster approach and departure compared to the present station location
JBC Prestatyn
LikeLike
Roger, there seems to be a half hourly service on Saturdays which is not implied by your remark about being hourly at weekends. I hope the 100 works well. It’s good to see a reasonable evening service from Cambridge with a journey time of only 20 minutes or so. The road layout seems friendly to buses. All good. In situations like this it would be good to perhaps see covenants for new residents which require rates/council tax to cover minimum bus services just an in other amenities like parks, bins and so on. Buses should be seen as essential infrastructure. With a reasonable fare and good service if it covers its cost all well and good but new residents with non driving kids and folk who might not want to have the cost of car ownership want to know that a good bus service is part of the provision in their community just like water and electricity.
MikeC
LikeLike
Thanks Mike. Have amended the text to refer to being hourly on Sundays.
LikeLike
The first image showing the location of the new station is misleading, it’s going to be further north (far from convenient for the existing village) being in field immediately south of the lake shown adjacent to the rail line.
LikeLike
The development on the barracks, and the funding for the 100 bus, is the New Town West. The New Town East, whose website you highlight, is a separate developer and development between the barracks site and the railway line, being a university owned company developing mainly university owned land. As part of their planning permission they said they would pay for the new station, but once they obtained it they decided that the station was not affordable so the unelected Greater Cambridge Partnership, on which the university sits, offered to use tax payers money to fund it instead – despite their own consultation producing an overwhelming result to leave the station (currently generating 400,000 journeys a year) where it is.
Saying the new town will double the size of the village is an understatement. The two developments making up the new town will be around 13,000 houses whereas the existing population is around 5,000 people – having already increased over 25% over the last decade.
LikeLike
There are some factual errors in the post above (Anonymous
).
The so-called ‘unelected’ Greater Cambridge Partnership is the delivery body of a ‘city deal’ with central government, worth up to £500 million in central government funding to 2030, signed in 2014.
The partners are: Cambridge City Council, Cambridgeshire County Council, South Cambridgeshire District Council, University of Cambridge and Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Combined Authority Business Board.
The Greater Cambridge Partnership executive board comprises three elected members with full voting rights (one from each of the three partner councils) and two non-voting members co-opted by the executive board; one nominated by the business board, and one nominated by the University of Cambridge.
The Greater Cambridge Partnership joint assembly comprises three elected members from each partner council; three co-opted members nominated by the business board and three co-opted members nominated by the University of Cambridge.
The joint assembly was formally established by Cambridge City Council, Cambridgeshire County Council and South Cambridgeshire District Council. It is a joint advisory committee of the three councils.
As a resident of Cambridge city, I no more have a ‘direct’ vote on the membership of the Greater Cambridge Partnership than I have a ‘direct’ vote on HMG’s cabinet ministers. That in no way makes central government ‘unelected’.
As for the funding of the new Waterbeach station…
The Greater Cambridge Partnership is providing £20m of the £37m needed for the new station, as it will help unlock thousands of new homes and deliver new, sustainable transport links. The remaining £17m will be funded by Homes England and the developer will pay back this contribution in the coming years. This is in line with the Greater Cambridge Partnership’s remit from central government.
Well, yes, there’s taxpayer money going in, as there is for East West Rail, and for the wholly taxpayer-funded A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbett ‘improvements’ (which are definitely not another section of the ‘cancelled’ A421 Ox-Cam Expressway).
LikeLiked by 1 person
NHS Waterbeach Shuttle
Service withdrawn.
Our contract to operate the shuttle between Waterbeach Barracks and the Royal Papworth Hospital expires on Sunday 31st May. We do not believe the NHS are procuring a replacement service at this stage. Passengers should catch Service 100 to the City and change for buses towards Addenbrookes and Royal Papworth provided by Stagecoach or A2B.
LikeLike
As much as I respect Roger as a transport professional & of course, his views on this particular forum, I was thinking of a national celebrity. Although Michael Portillo does a fantastic job of promoting railway travel, for some reason I don’t see him travelling & reporting on buses as well. Then again….
LikeLike
What in “bus world” would be the equivalent of saving the Settle-Carlisle line?
LikeLike