There’s currently just one small problem with hydrogen buses…..

Thursday 11th April 2024

I attended a fascinating and timely visit organised by the Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport to Metrobus’s Crawley bus garage on Tuesday.

It was to hear more about the challenges the Company is facing with its pioneering introduction of liquid “green” hydrogen including commissioning what is destined to be “the largest fuelling station of its kind in Europe” according to hydrogen supplier Air Products.

But there’s a problem.

Twelve months on from the roll out of the first single deck buses on route 10, the fuelling station remains out of use due to bureaucratic challenges involving the Health & Safety Executive and Government Planning Guidance.

But what came through loud and clear on Tuesday was the determination of the Metrobus team to overcome the hurdles they’ve faced and continue with the roll out so they can take advantage of the undoubted many benefits hydrogen brings.

Managing Director Ed Wills gave us a fascinating comprehensive briefing about all the challenges, teething problems and issues that are inevitable when introducing something as revolutionary as a new fleet of hydrogen powered buses.

Metrobus’s first 20 Wrightbus GB Kite Hydroliner single decks were launched, twelve months later than originally planned, in June 2023 for use on Fastway bus routes linking Crawley with Gatwick Airport (which contributed towards their funding), as well as the UK Government and (because it dates back some time ago when the order was submitted) the European Union JIVE scheme (Joint Initiative for Hydrogen Vehicles).

When I took a ride on the new buses on route 10 last July I explained “one of the current drawbacks of hydrogen operation is the very limited supply of ‘green’ hydrogen. This is affecting ….. all fleets, and indeed at Metrobus only around five of the new fleet are in service on any one day while the current fuelling arrangements at the company’s Crawley bus garage are from a temporary installation with the permanent facility awaiting official authorisation and approval.”

It’s good to see around 10 of the 20 buses are now in service every day, almost the full allocation on route 10, but those frustrations of hydrogen supply still mean the temporary installation is in place and the company is having to rely on the uncertainties surrounding a delivery of the ‘grey’ kind of gas hydrogen (produced by electricity/fossil fuels) from tankers, two or three times a week. And unlike the supply of diesel which has long established and reliable supply chain arrangements, receiving deliveries of hydrogen gas is much more precarious with reliance on ‘just-in-time’ deliveries which sometimes ‘just’ (don’t arrive) ‘in time’.

Ed is both realistic and sanguine about the future prospects. Which is just as well, as in addition to the 20 Hydroliners delivered last year, 34 more are currently in build thanks to a partnership and funding from Surrey County Council and last month, the Company heard its partnership with West Sussex County Council, Surrey County Council, Kent County Council as well as Gatwick Airport had won a bid for funding to buy 43 more hydrogen powered buses (including 11 double decks) with match funding from the Government’s ‘ZEBRA 2’ fund. That’ll bring the number of hyrdogen powered buses based at Crawley to an impressive 97 vehicles, making it possibly the largest such installation in the UK and Europe.

It’s great news for Metrobus and its passengers. The company pays the equivalent of a Euro 6 bus with the funding needed to upgrade to a hydrogen bus coming from Government. With single deck hydrogen buses costing as much as half a million pounds apiece these days, that’s not to be sniffed at. Nor is the cost of the infrastructure needed at the garage.

As well as the storage and dispensing facilities from supplier Air Products, there’s a need to convert workshop areas to accommodate the special requirements of maintaining hydrogen powered buses, not least the need to avoid any ‘sparks effect’.

We were shown around the facilities which have been introduced at Crawley for the first 20 buses including the £400,000 conversion of an existing workshop bay and installing special vents in the roof and a £21,000 anti-static floor surface.

Thankfully the DVSA approved official MoT bay alongside doesn’t need the ‘hydrogen treatment’ as buses are only ‘inspected’ rather than ‘maintained’ when parked in that area, but with the prospect of a fleet of 97 buses, clearly more workshop bays will need converting, as well as engineering staff trained.

Wrightbus is currently providing a full time engineer on site from 06:00 every weekday to oversee any maintenance issues with the fleet which, with just 10 out on a weekday, seven on a Saturday and five on a Sunday from the fleet of 20, is manageable.

Ed explained the reason for his continued commitment to the hydrogen project, notwithstanding the hurdles, is not only the green credentials of the fuel but also its properties make it ideal for the intensive urban services the company operates to Gatwick Airport with 24/7, 365 a year schedules making it impractical if the buses were battery-electric needing regular charging. It’s reckoned five or six extra buses would be required just to maintain current timetables. Hydrogen powered buses, on the other hand, have a range of up to 550 miles making them eminently suitable for this type of intense work as well as longer distance inter-urban routes which also feature prominently in the Metrobus network.

Not only that, but as Ed explained, the Hydrogen storage and dispensing facilities have seen just 12 parking spaces taken out whereas if a fleet of 97 electric buses needed access to battery recharging facilities the space required would be much greater in what is already a confined parking area at the garage.

Although battery range is improving as well as new options for fast charging, the fuelling of a hydrogen bus is expected to take around eight minutes once the new set up is commissioned and the appropriate pressure available, which is much quicker than a full electric battery recharge. Due to the current temporary arrangements it’s taking around 20 minutes to fuel a hydrogen bus.

Ed bears the frustrations of the current situation well and you can’t help but admire his positivity. He is full of praise for the performance of the initial batch of Hydroliners, explaining they’re doing “a good job out on the road”. We were given a sample ride through Crawley’s impressive guided busway as well as around the town and to Gatwick Airport and back, and you can see why Ed is pleased. The acceleration is impressive as is the ride comfort. Passengers are well catered for and the buses are reliable.

But what is to come of the current impasse? Not least as Ed frustratingly explained there’s no shortage of green liquid hydrogen. “It’s available in Rotterdam now” he explained “and just needs bringing over to Immingham and then delivered to Crawley”. Everything is in place at the garage ready to receive it.

Instead, the company is having to accept uncertain deliveries of ‘non-green’ hydrogen gas into temporary storage and dispensing facilities which limit the scope of daily operations to around 10 buses a day. Although, at least they’re achieving buses on the road. It’s much more hit and miss in the West Midlands and Merseyside where double deck hydrogen buses have yet to achieve consistent availability for service.

The UK Government’s Hydrogen Strategy issued in August 2021 is full of ambitious goals for future production and use of the fuel throughout industry and even domestically including a target “for 5GW of low carbon hydrogen production capacity by 2030” but the section on storage fails to address the impasse Metrobus has found itself in, instead stating blandly “hydrogen’s ability to store energy for long periods of time and in large quantities is an important part of its strategic value to a fully decarbonised energy system, and we envisage hydrogen storage being a key part of future network infrastructure. Storage can support security of supply as production and use increase and become more spread over time and distance.”

Which is all good to know especially as the same UK Government is providing funding for the purchase of buses to run on hydrogen, which of course has to be stored in sufficient quantity at one time to ensure continuity of bus operation.

But, in the meantime the UK Government’s Health & Safety Executive (HSE) are properly following current UK Government guidelines concerning on-site storage of hydrogen, which some would observe are now outdated in view of the UK Government’s Strategy towards Net Zero.

The Metrobus storage facility is capable of holding 5,000kg of hydrogen. For that, it needs planning consent from Crawley Borough Council which in turn must seek advice from the HSE. Metrobus submitted its application in March 2022 expecting a 12 month delay and two years later, on 18th March 2024, the HSE finally determined its position concluding “the risks to the surrounding population arising from the proposed operation(s) are sufficiently high to justify advising against the granting of Hazardous Substances Consent on grounds of safety”.

Ed told us a particular concern is a relatively new secondary school sited close by on former industrial land.

Although why that raises a concern greater than, for example, Metrobus staff working in the adjacent offices and workshops or passengers on trains passing close by on the Brighton Main Line is a mystery.

Crawley Borough Council could still grant the application but that seems unlikely in view of the HSE’s unequivocal position. Indeed in its advice letter the HSE stated “if there are factors which weigh strongly in favour of the application, we suggest that it would be desirable for an Inspector from HSE to attend a meeting to explain the technical assessment and level of risk in more detail, before a final decision is made” as well as reminding the Council “where a hazardous substances authority is minded to grant consent against COMAH competent authority advice, it should notify the COMAH competent authority and allow 21 days for the competent authority to give further consideration. During that period the COMAH competent authority will consider whether to request the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government to call-in the application for determination.” HSE is part of the COMAH competent authority.

I think we can take it the Council will not be granting the consent at this time. Unless circumstances change – and it seems that needs UK Government to redefine safe storage quantities of hydrogen and planning guidance – we are unlikely to see more than 10 of the current 20, and in due course, potentially 97 new hydrogen buses, on the road.

Which is a shame.

Roger French

Blogging timetable: 06:00 TThS

Comments on today’s blog are welcome but please keep them relevant to the blog topic, avoid personal insults and add your name (or an identifier). Thank you.

38 thoughts on “There’s currently just one small problem with hydrogen buses…..

  1. This seems crazy. Surely it would have been cheaper to go for electric (or electric hybrid) and accept the extra buses needed? Having all these buses unable to be used over this length of time is a very significant cost. My sense is that this is never going to fly, and will end up in another vast waste of public money. In the meantime, passengers on other Metrobus routes are having to travel on time-expired buses which are, frankly, in an appalling state – particularly some of the older Scania single decks, which are, presumably, being kept in service because of this fiasco.

    Like

    1. Agreed, it’s a real shame but we know our government always finds a way to waste money. Would be great if Crawley Council just gave permission for the hydrogen storage but we’ll see what happens in the future.

      Like

  2. Presumably there are also risks from sparks from the immediately adjacent third rail electric railway?

    Like

  3. Considering Gatwick Airport provided funding for the buses, could it be an idea to build a hydrogen storage facility somewhere on the Gatwick Airport site? This could work as they have a large area near the current fire training aircraft and they have firefighting facilities on site.

    Like

  4. It’s sad to see that no attention is being paid to the most efficient – and on the basis of realistic whole-life costing – cheapest means of operating urban bus services: IMC (In Motion Charging) trolleybuses. No fuelling time; no safe storage of fuel issues – indeed, no fuel needs to be carried on the vehicles which have a limitless range. Overhead line equipment no longer requires “special work” such as frogs (points) and crossings so claims of unsightly wiring are invalid. Besides, the wires we can see don’t kill us – it’s the particulate emissions we can’t see that do! Battery life is considerably shortened by so-called opportunity charging and overnight charging is not much better (and requires a lot of space). So, we need to get the wires up along the streets most-used by buses so that IMC can improve battery life, reduce vehicle weight and with automated poling and re-poling allow transition at a bus stop from wired to unwired operation. There is an urgent need to have a full-scale trial of IMC technology in the UK. What better place to start than hilly Brighton so that Ed Wills gets the benefit of close comparison with Hydrogen operation.

    from Andrew Braddock

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I agree with Andrew, trolleybuses should be seriously considered. They are tried and tested technology, reliable, don’t need to carry their power source around so are lighter weight. if you look at Swiss systems you will see that they negotiate frogs at high speed, and as he says can automatically desire and rewire themselves to operate wire free. I wonder how the cost of this hydrogen shenanigans, and battery charging depot infrastructure compares with the cost of overhead wires and the power transmission network.

      Peter Brown

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Nice trip across Zurich on a new trolley line with some wire free operation. also interesting to see the approach to bus priorities at traffic signal controlled junctions.

        Peter Brown

        Like

  5. UK-wide, here are the hydrogen fuel-cell (FCEV) bus schemes for regular services that I know of, including the 4 already mentioned:

    • Aberdeen (FirstBus)
    • Belfast (Translink)
    • Crawley / LGW / Horley (Metrobus)
    • London (TfL / Metroline)
    • Merseyside (Merseytravel / Arriva / Stagecoach)
    • West Midlands (NXWM)

    Translink and Metroline are suppled with domestically-produced hydrogen from Dunloy (Energia Group) and Runcorn (Air Liquide) respectively, as far as I know. Not sure where the others besides Metrobus get theirs from, domestically or otherwise.

    Furthermore, the London scheme (route 7) is perhaps the only one where regular non-FCEV substitutions are the exception / minority.

    Like

    1. NX West Midlands use a hydrogen-generating facility at Tyseley Energy Park in Birmingham to refuel their buses, unfortunately this keeps breaking down and has now been out of use since January, with seemingly no sign of it becoming operational again any time soon.

      Like

  6. With regard to green hydrogen production specifically…

    Any news on what’s up with the Hygen Energy facility proposed to be built alongside Wright’s Ballymena factory? A planning application was meant to be submitted last year but there’s no sign of any submission on the NI Planning Portal.

    Their other proposed facility (in Bradford, with N-Gen) received planning permission recently so looks to be further advanced in that respect.

    (N.B. Hygen Energy / Wright are both (part-)owned by Jo Bamford)

    Like

  7. I’m relieved to hear that the storage is 5,000kg not 50,000kg, my mind was boggling at that. Unfortunately my mind was drawn back something fifty five years when our chemistry teacher decided to prove that the combustion of Hydrogen and Oxygen produces Water and nothing else. Sadly the large glass flask that he used wasn’t up to coping with the resultant explosion!

    While it didn’t put me off having a half century career in chemistry, it does make me nervous of having Hydrogen buses. Like other commentators, I wonder if trolleybuses might be the way forward.

    Nigel Turner

    Like

  8. If Crawley Borough Council’s “Safety First” policy is repeated by Luton Borough Council – the lost car park at their Airport ought not to be replaced. Think of all those small containers of motor spirit which the new car park shall contain.

    Like

  9. This is a timely post. On April 11 1968 together with my friend John Fann, I was the last passenger on Durban’s trolleybuses. 1948 Sunbeam number 2040. 56 years later I would like to add my support to the posts from Andrew Braddock and Peter Brown. Our failure to look at trolleybuses properly, borders on the criminal.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Of course we should look across the Channel at trolleybuses – see how efficient they are now

    Prague is the latest city to re-introduce them

    malcolm chase. Buses Worldwide

    Like

  11. I’d say its a massive problem. National Express West Midlands have twenty of these vehicles based at their garage in Walsall, none of which have seen any service since towards the end of January.

    There is also a commitment to purchase another 100 using ZEBRA funding.

    The issue is there is currently only one hydrogen refuelling facility which is in the Tyseley area of Birmingham, and that has been beset with issues for several months, despite being a fairly-recently built facility.

    There’s a demonstrable lack of foresight when bus operators are committing to buy hydrogen vehicles without ensuring that there will be suitable (and reliable) refuelling facilities available.

    Stu – West Midlands Bus Users

    Like

  12. First London used hydrogen buses for many years on a TfL contract. I say used however, they were often substituted by a diesel bus and the safety protocols at the garage were very strict for obvious reasons. The concept was flawed and remains so to this day.

    Like

  13. ALL of the supposedly “green” zero carbon emissions options perform worse in almost every respect than internal combustion engines. They can ONLY made to be acceptable for operators because of heavy government subsidies. Is it actually “good news” that ordinary people are paying for this through their taxes and fuel bills?

    Battery electric buses are even worse – do we need to actually explain why? But obviously the well known huge drawbacks of hydrogen gas do not suddenly disappear just because it has been deemed one of only two acceptable options for powering buses. Among others that a large amount of energy is required just to produce the liquid hydrogen!

    The government forcing users, individual or corporate, to use particular technologies is unlikely to end well.

    Like

  14. I would add that if we want reliable zero carbon emissions buses, then trolleybuses provide proven simple and reliable technology.

    Like

  15. Merseytravel spent millions on a batch of 20 Hydrogen buses for the 10A Liverpool-St Helens the fleet are spread between Stagecoach & Arriva, yet only a couple of these buses have only briefly entered service last spring/summer [from Arriva St Helens depot], right now they’re all rusting away at the back of both depots, with most of them not even entered service.

    SM

    Like

  16. Fyi

    Matthew Hanlon
    Director

    EPM Bus Solutions

    Mobile – 07900901081

    Sent from my iPhone

    Like

    1. Cannot see anything on your website about electric or gas powered buses, Matthew – so not sure what the relevance is?

      Nigel Frampton

      Like

  17. so sad to go down such a rabbit hole. People will literally die in this flawed experiment.

    hydrogen is probably the best way of converting input energy into a lot less output energy, so great if you are in the gas supply business but no advantage to the operator.

    I am not familiar with the routes and dwell timings but suspect putting underfloor charging pads at the bus stop at each end of the route would be enough to keep the vehicles nicely topped up all day long. 
    typical consumption would be around 1 kWh per mile and if EV cars can accept 150kW, I don’t see why a bus couldn’t easily add 8 miles additional range per 5 min stop, or 32 in a 10 min period with 300kW. Yea a bit of engineering involved but so much easier, achievable, cheaper and safer than messing around with Hydrogen.

    plus of course actually reduces pollution and emissions unlike even green hydrogen, search for Paul Martin if you don’t understand why.

    Like

    1. Sorry, to clarify, I am proposing a full battery electric alternative.

      Has lots of advantages but most important it is energy/emissions efficient, unlike Hydrogen. No amount of R&D can change the properties of Hydrogen so its like backing development of a coal-powered bus when EV ones are now available.

      Hydrogen is the smallest element, it will leak out of anything, it is odourless and colourless and burns with a see-through flame. When it leaks it collects in the highest place it can get (eg roof space) and when it is vented into the atmosphere has long term global-warming impact many multiples of dielse emissions.

      To carry a reasonable amount it has to be under pressure, in cars typically 700 atmospheres! Thats a lot of pressure, if/when the tank ruptures, none of the passengers will feel a thing (as the distructive force is so high) but near-by vehicles will all have their air-bags set off too.

      If there was some cost advantage, convenience advantage, polution advantage then it might be worth pursuing but a Hydrogen bus has noen of these. Absolutely bonkers. Clever move by the oild and gas industry as a) delays the eventual move to EV and b) they can offer to supply “dirty” hydrogen as a by-product of oil/gas. Genius move but dont fall for it, no advantage to anyone else.

      Like

    2. Can you clarify the involvement of “Paul Martin”? Do you mean the former prime minister of Canada – who is at the top of the results list on a Google search for that name?

      Nigel Frampton

      Like

  18. The big question why was this not signed off by the Council and H&S before at design stage to avert any major problems and orders placed for buses?

    Like

  19. It is early days with Hydrogen but it shows a lot of promise compared to battery powered EV’s. The risk of hydrogen is very much overplayed. All fuels are potentially hazardous

    Batteries have a finite life and are slow to charge and have limited range, For lorries hydrogen is probably the only viable option at present and for many bus routes hydrogen is likely to be a better option than batteries

    Another option is the trolleybus. Some work has been done by powering it by inductive coupling but I do not think they have got far with that. A more promising approach is a hybrid trolleybus. Battery powered vehicle, You could have the overhead power for the busy central section of the bus routes and switch to battery power on the outer sections, This gives quite a cost effective solution

    Like

  20. There seems to be a complete inability to do these things in a logical order. Zebra money should never be handed out unless there is clear evidence that installation of the relevant charging equipment is possible both in terms of getting planning permission and/or hooking it up the grid. 

    This seems to happen over and over again where the DfT is involved and not just for buses. One of the problems with the East Coast Mainline is that there are sections where the power supply can’t support the proposed timetable so we’re faced with the prospect of Class 8xxs running on diesel under the wires. 

    Like

    1. At least the wires are there – unlike on the GWML west of Cardiff and, IMO unbelievably, Chippenham.

      Andrew Kleissner.

      Like

      1. Yes you can see the masts without wires west of Chippenham. They lowered the track through Box Tunnel and in Sydney Gardens in Bath. Totally unacceptable to have cancelled the project.

        Peter Brown

        Like

  21. I can’t relate the exact technical reasons but Roger Ford of the excellent Modern Railways has come out against hydrogen powered trains. The greenest state in Germany, Baden Wurttemburg, has amongst an ambitious rail reopening plan, come out firmly against hydrogen powered trains. I’m no scientist but I can’t help thinking there are some serious issues here that haven’t been thought through. If we’re serious about decarbonising transport we’d firstly concentrate on modal shift from car to bus and train even if the buses and trains were still fossil fuelled. Then we’d fully electrify the railways. Finally we’d focus on batteries for buses and build some trolley bus routes.
    mikeC.

    Like

    1. EV buses currently have many problems such as slow charging, Lack of grid capacity, lack of range etc

      Like

    2. Another issue that isn’t being thought through is the withdrawal of affordable IC cars (eg Ford Fiesta), but the lack of replacement compact EV models. The big car manufacturers are only making SUV EVs which are astronomically expensive. going forward the supply of compact IC models will diminish and if demand is still high (because EVs are unaffordable) their prices will rise. Eventually people will be priced out of motoring. This could be catered for by investing in public transport, and cycling infrastructure, and promoting ebikes as the short trip ideal mode. eCargo bikes can do many tasks that a small car can do. We also need to stop covering fields in unaffordable detached houses with no local facilities, and start building mixed developments of low rise apartments to buy and rent (after abolishing feudal leasehold), and terraced housing to create medium density walkable neighbourhoods, with local facilities to hand, segregated cycle paths, and bus priorities, to bust the car dependency disease for the sake of the planet and our health.

      Peter Brown

      Like

  22. Am I not reading the text correctly or has the (Air Products) Hydrogen fuelling station already been built? If correct why before planning permission, which seemingly now will not be granted, was given?

    JD

    Like

  23. Lots of commenters here seem to be pining on the operators for committing to the rollout of Hydrogen powered buses.

    It’s worth remembering that the motivation for this block of funding supporting a chunk of hydrogen bus delivery was a goal of the government’s Hydrogen Strategy, and funding was allocated within the Ultra-Low Emissions Bus funding, available from 2018. This funded the first 20 buses (with assessment of applications favouring those “demonstrat[ing] an ambition to
    purchase further ultra-low emission buses after the lifetime of the grant”, which has been met by the purchase of further buses in 2023.

    It seems nuts to me that planning and delivery of the fuelling facility, which has been driven so strongly by government policy and strategy, and has gone through an application process, has been held up because (frankly) those evaluating this hydrogen fuel scheme did not engage with planning and safety requirements before approving the funding. The original funding required that the successful bid be scalable, and clearly it can’t be!

    Like

  24. It is a great shame that TROLLEYBUSES were not even considered for such a project as this. I wholeheartedly agree with Andrew Braddock and Peter Brown. Trolleybuses do not require such expensive infrastructure just overhead wires and traction poles and substations. Trolleybuses have in motion charging facilities so don’t need to be charged overnight. Trolleybuses are quiet, efficient, clean and powerful – their hill climbing abilities are incredible as Prague has recently found out. Brighton would be the ideal place to try them out again. Between 1939 and 1961 Brighton had a brilliant trolleybus network which served the town really well and if there had not been the intervention of the Second World War the system would have expanded into to other areas of the town. Prague ( a city that has had an incredible tram network for many years) has just introduced a brand new trolleybus route between the Airport and City Centre using twenty double articulated trolleybuses. This is a tremendous step forward and I am sure the trolleybus will continue to grow in this city for its future travel requirements. People always moan about the booms coming of the overhead wires. Things have moved on greatly from those old days when British overhead was overly engineered. Newer flexible fixings allow the trolley booms to swing and sway and avoid coming separated from the wires. The time to re-consider the trolleybus as a perfect solution to modern transport requirements without spending huge amounts of wasted money in Great Britain is NOW! Please will someone within transport circles stand up now and be counted. The trolleybus is very much an underestimated form of travel in the UK. Just look at the number of systems there are in just Europe alone – they seem to know how to solve travel problems in their towns and cities. Why is that we in the UK fail to appreciate the trolleybus! Come on Ed Wills, let us have trolleybuses back in Brighton- P L E A S E !!     Mervyn Stedman

    Like

Comments are closed.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑