Another troubled Transport Interchange

Tuesday 13th February 2024

Barry Docks isn’t the only location with a troubled Transport Interchange.

Just before Christmas, the Central Bedfordshire town of Flitwick finally saw buses begin using its new £4.8 million three-bus-stop Transport Interchange, built close to the entrance to the railway station (on the Midland Main Line, one stop south of Bedford).

But in a familiar refrain, it turns out the opening has been mired in delay and controversy and even now, only a few buses are using the new Interchange due to issues over access and egress.

Plans to regenerate the area around Flitwick railway station have long been discussed and subjected to public consultation, with the first substantial scheme publicised in 2007 involving Tesco, which occupies a large site opposite the station, on Steppingley Road. Those proposals came to nothing after Tesco withdrew from the scheme in 2010.

Fast forward to 2017, with Central Bedfordshire having become a unitary council in 2009, and in the meantime having purchased various parcels of land around the station leading to a transformational project” being devised aimed at “a more attractive and successful town centre better capable of supporting the needs of Flitwick and West Mid Beds as a strategically important transport gateway and hub.”

Flitwick has always suffered from the railway line splitting the town centre in two with High Street north of the tracks and the entrance to the station, Tesco and other retail outlets south. The 2017 project envisaged new retail, housing, a Public Transport Interchange and additional car parking with “a major national retailer” on board all being constructed south of the tracks on the acquired land and rejigging the Network Rail/GTR station car park.

Fast forward again to April 2021 and a slimmed down scheme, minus the retail but incorporating a Transport Interchange as well as public realm improvements around the station and improved car parking, was approved with funding of £2.2 million from the Government’s £27 million ‘Getting Building Fund’ allocated to, and overseen by, South East Midlands Local Enterprise Partnership (SEMLEP), £2.5 million from Central Bedfordshire’s capital budget and the remaining £167,000 from developer Section 106 funds.

Documentation justifying the funding contained noble objectives and lots of fine words

Hilary Chipping, SEMLEP’s Chief Executive reckoned she was “delighted to be supporting this project which will support sustainable travel as well as regenerate the area for the benefit of the people of Flitwick” adding “projects such as this help deliver key priorities at the heart of the Oxford-Cambridge Arc including connectivity, skills for all, the green recovery and innovation which all generate jobs and support the local economy.”

Personally, I have my doubts whether 24 bus departures a day picking up and setting down in a £4.8 million lay-by rather than at the roadside is going to revolutionise the “Oxford-Cambridge Arc” of connectivity, but I guess time will tell.

Back in the optimism of April 2021 work was set to begin on constructing the new Transport Interchange in August that year with an opening planned “by the end of 2022”.

However in January 2023 as construction was nearing completion, managers at both Grant Palmer and Stagecoach expressed safety concerns over passenger crossing points as well as the practicality of buses actually being able to use the bus stops which had been designed and constructed with very tight kerbs and space for buses to get in and out as you can see in the above photograph taken from Central Bedfordshire Council’s website.

Modifications were made during summer 2023 but it wasn’t until just before Christmas when northbound buses (towards Ampthill, Bedford and Milton Keynes), operated by Grant Palmer and Stagecoach, finally began using the new bus station along with the Mondays and Fridays only half hour shuttle bus to Centre Parcs Woburn Forest (a seven minute ride away).

SEMLEP’s website contains details of the Transport Interchange as a case study but erroneously states as at April 2023 “construction was completed in December 2022 as planned and the interchange is now operational” which just goes to show you can’t believe everything you read about case studies.

Finally opened in December, Grant Palmer uses stand A for departures on its route 34 to Milton Keynes and route 42 to Bedford (both hourly) and the Centre Parcs shuttle on Mondays and Fridays…

… while Stagecoach have been using stand B for its hourly route 2 to Bedford.

Flittabus, the local community bus operator also calls into the Transport Interchange and uses stand C for its two to four departures per day to various rural destinations, depending on the day of the week.

Sadly, less than two months since opening, use of the Transport Interchange reduces by a third this week as Stagecoach withdraws its route 2 on Saturday without replacement, leaving the route to Bedford exclusively to Grant Palmer’s route 42.

The problem with diverting more services into the new Interchange arises from buses having to turn left into Steppingley Road when exiting …

… and then having to turn at the roundabout by the railway bridge and retrace the route back passed the Transport Interchange. With the routes tightly timed, Grant Palmer are reluctant to make changes at this stage, so instead, having observed a bus stop in High Street, they speed past the Interchange opposite Tesco without calling.

This means buses on Grant Palmer’s routes 34 and 42 in one direction as well as route 200 to Biggleswade continue to pick up at on-street bus stops on the other side of the railway bridge.

So far readers may have picked up this blog has been rather critical, so I’d like to redress the balance by saying well done Central Bedfordshire Council for trying to overcome a problem of poor interchange between buses and trains in Flitwick.

Previously the two main bus stops in the town were those shown on the map in the above photograph either side of High Street.

This is where buses would pause to maintain time if appropriate, which is not ideal and often caused obstructions to traffic, as well as the stops being some distance from the entrance to the railway station.

The new arrangements outside the station building make for a much more pleasant and convenient area for passengers to wait and catch a bus.

The area immediately outside the station building has been greatly improved…

… and an accessible toilet block has been added immediately outside.

There’s an electronic departure sign showing bus departures on one side and trains on the other as soon as you leave the station building …

… and another as you approach the Transport Interchange, although sadly they don’t show departures from the High Street and Kings Road.

The Transport Interchange is at a higher level to the station building …

… and there are steps as well as a ramp to reach it.

There’s also some nice public realm touches with seating.

The bus shelters look smart, with an adjacent litter bin.

They each have a real time sign inside…

… as well as a large poster size departure listing – which I also noticed are displayed at many bus stops/shelters throughout Central Bedfordshire.

All in all, it’s now a very pleasant spot.

It’s just a shame it’s not been possible for more buses to use it and the talked about new footbridge and lifts for the station, making it accessible, have not yet been installed by Network Rail/GTR.

Roger French

Blogging timetable: 06:00 TThS.

On Tuesday, 13th February, at 12:00 don’t miss my free-to-attend online webinar “Secrets of a Successful Bus Operation” thanks to the Foundation for Integrated Transport. Book your place here.

Comments are welcome but please keep them relevant to the blog topic, avoid personal insults and add your name (or an identifier). Thank you.

25 thoughts on “Another troubled Transport Interchange

  1. How an earth can they justify spending £5M on a bus station serving a few low frequency routes ? . High Streets are contracting so try to expand the retail was always in my view doomed to fail. Quite what they are on about with Oxford and Cambridge who knows both are a fair way from Flitwick. If they were to travel it would probably be by rail when the East West rail line opens

    Like

  2. It’s a shame the problem about the exit hasn’t been sorted – maybe there needed to be a bit more talk with the bus operators in the first place. Or is there a local bus or rail user group who could have pointed out issues like this. I searched the internet but can’t find any user group for Flitwick; maybe the council and operators could encourage one to form – stick up a poster etc.. In general, besides pushing for more/better service, such groups are a very useful source of feed-back and generators of custom. They have chalked up successes for re-openings etc. in many parts of the country, often taking on jobs like caring for stations, keeping timetables up to date and so on.

    Your point about bad placing of road-side stops near the station is widely relevant. Many ‘transport interchanges’ which consist of merely a bus stop each side of the road near a railway station operate very well, if they are close by, have good information, way-finding signs, and a safe way to cross the road – and don’t cost millions. Is there a special reason why this could not have worked in Flitwick? The ideal place for interchange bus-stops lookas if it would be on the road bridge, with steps/lifts directly down to the railway platforms. If the bridge needed widening, that would surely have cost less than £4.8million …

    Like

  3. Stagecoach East is giving up on route 2 after this week, possibly to help resource the extension of route 9 from Hitchin to Stevenage and increased frequencies on the X5 (Bedford – Oxford) and 905 (Bedford – Cambridge).

    Ian McNeil

    Like

  4. Once bus service go below every half hour they become very unattractive and the passengers give up on them even more so if the service becomes less reliable

    Like

  5. The only main service in Flitwick are the 34, 42 and 44 all 3 run hourly
    Other services are just a few journeys. Few buses terminate at the bus station

    Unless they are expecting a massive increase in bus journey that bus station seems to be far to big for the number of buses using it. ” bust shelters would have done the job. One for though buses and another for terminating buses

    Like

  6. Another example of somebody in local government designing something without looking at the actual requirements. One large bus stop with space for a couple of vehicles and the ability to get in and out quickly would have been a far better offering for all concerned. It is clear from the photographs that the site is far too tight and unfit for purpose. Such a missed opportunity.

    Like

  7. Interchange between bus and train used to work ok when the station entrance on the bridge was in use but in recent years that has become merely an emergency exit because of perceived levels of fraudulent travel and there being no gateline at that entrance / exit meaning everyone having to use the station building.

    Arriva-escapee

    Like

  8. That’s an inspired livery choice on the Centre Parcs bus. Red with a lower band of road-dirt colour to disguise the, err road dirt !

    Petras409

    Like

  9. You might like to have a look at Biggleswade ‘interchange’ as well! Also Central Bedfordshire Council, also funded using the same stream, also designed by the same team, also (potentially) served by Grant Palmer Ltd (& Herberts Travel), also, um, completely not served at all.

    Like

    1. Such a shame that another council have more (capital) money than sense. Building things just because money is available is hardly sustainable nor a good use of public money when so many services are being cut.

      Gareth Cheeseman

      Like

  10. Being car free (but not vegetarian) we have used the rail and CP bus to centreparcs from Flitwick a few times. When we tipped up last time the lady representative waiting did indeed say the bus couldn’t come because it couldn’t turn round in the new space. I was gobsmacked. They got us a local cab instead.

    Like

  11. Can we please see the West Berkshire Council Transport Services DRT being done because we were promised that the whole of West Berkshire would be served from Calcot towards the Wiltshire Hampshire & Oxfordshire borders but it has the app doesn’t work full stop and laggs plus crashes constantly

    Also we were promised the Tadley Baughurst Kingsclere old Burghclere & Highclere would be Serviced but unsurprisingly lied too and I’m completely fed up with it

    Becca Seymour & Jenny Sawyer

    Like

  12. When planning new road / highway spaces , are not swept curve analysis completed ? Is it expected that rail replacement road services will use this facility? What is the level of service on the routes on a Sunday ? Finally looking at the county map I am not sure if Flitwick is centred for great transport connection potential to many places, or is located in the middle of nowhere.
    J B C Prestatyn

    Like

    1. No Sunday services as far as I can tell even on Saturday most of the services do not run or run at a very much reduced frequency

      Like

  13. Councils rarely consult the bus companies or passengers preferring to pay Consultants a small fortune to come up with grandiose schemes

    Like

  14. To answer JBC Prestatyn above …. in the 1990 Harrow Bus Station was built on a constrained site, with a difficult entrance.
    A couple of years later, Route 186 was converted to LLW buses (early low-floor).
    During the route survey, the representative from London Transport was of the opinion that, having looked at the plans, said buses wouldn’t fit. The bus came along and swept into the Bus Station with no difficulty at all!!!
    Sometimes, plans alone aren’t enough …. the Mark One human can make things work ….

    Like

    1. No excuse now though as you can computer model it. /the only variable being the type of buses using it so need to cope with the largest bus likely to use it

      Like

  15. Thanks for the write up about my local station. Flitwick is a surprisingly busy station, (as seen by the large full car parks), being the railhead for Ampthill and surrounding towns and villages. Unfortunately there are no evening or Sunday buses and next week after the withdrawal of Stagecoach’s route 2 the last buses will be at 6 pm or before, hardly helpful for commuting !
    I am puzzled, were Grant Palmer and Stagecoach not consulted on the bus interchange designs, their comments ignored or did everybody just get it wrong?
    The road and roundabout by the station and Tesco can get quite congested and the Grant Palmer routes are very tightly timed, so I can see why they do not want to call in when going the ‘other way’ ,indeed route 200 still starts and terminates on the other side of the railway bridge.
    The environs of the station certainly look better, but I doubt there has been much affect on overall bus usage
    Clifford Martin.

    Like

    1. This is a better link to the original TfGM web-page which includes the link to the list of services and a plan of the new bus station – sorry that should be new Transport Interchange!

      https://news.tfgm.com/press-releases/59f728c0-fb5e-40d7-9f4b-6999f94f0cb2/buses-to-start-running-from-new-stockport-interchange-and-park-to-open-next-month
      (or just go to news.tfgm.com and you will find it plus a press release on franchising stage 2)

      The curious feature is stand S in Swaine Street outside the main building, it almost looks like an after thought. Is it because they found there was not enough room for all services?

      A. Henthorn Stott

      Like

Comments are closed.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑