One Arterio finally in service

Thursday 25th January 2024

I know I’m late to the “let’s finally welcome SWR’s new Arterio trains into service” party with lots of online coverage already available following SWR’s ‘soft launch’ a fortnight ago of one train running a limited service, but 14 days is nothing compared to the four year wait to see these 90 trains earn their £1 billion price tag.

But we are where we are and at least one train making two Waterloo to Windsor & Eton Riverside return journeys each weekday off-peak is better than the void we’ve had since 2019 when the first trains were delivered.

The two journeys leave Waterloo at 10:25 and 12:53 returning from Windsor & Eton Riverside at 11:30 and 14:00 running as extras to the normal half hourly service thereby giving a nice surprise to the few passengers turning up early for their normal train.

Built by Bombardier – which was bought out by Alstom in 2021 – these Class 701 trains which SWR are branding Arterio are part of Bombardier/Alstom’s wider Aventra family which has seen similar trains introduced at London Overground, Greater Anglia, c2c, the Elizabeth Line and West Midlands Trains (WMT) but each train company has its own take on internal fitting out.

Having sampled a return journey to Windsor on Tuesday there are many positives to report on the Arterio travel experience, but also a few niggles too.

Firstly, for a commuter railway, the seating is getting on for as good as it gets. No London Overground/Elizabeth Line inward facing longitudinal seats here…

… nor Greater Anglia 3+2 seats with a central gangway you can hardly walk down without having to part turn sideways …

… and you won’t find Greater Anglia’s tip up seats getting in the way of the doors with constricted entry/exit.

These Class 701s are all 2+2 seating with a mixture of airline style and facing pairs around a mini-table and with a nice wide gangway.

But what a shame there are no seat back trays for those with lap tops and coffee cups – two staples of many commuters these days.

Indeed, the interior decor is a bit ‘Thameslink Siemens Class 700/717-like’ in terms of colour and fairly restricted leg room in the airline seats …

… and the fact the seats are hard up against the sides …

… with a protruding skirting panel making it a bit awkward on the nearside compared to sitting in the gangway seat where there’s more room to stretch your legs.

I noticed when the mini-tables are in use by a laptop user there’s not much room for anything else.

It’s a shame they couldn’t have been extended the full width of the double seat as on WMT’s Class 730s.

At the end of each coach the seat pairs may have a mini-table but sadly one seat doesn’t enjoy a window view, but there again, you can’t have everything and someone has to forgo a window.

The ten coach trains are walk through with a wheelchair area and accessible toilet in coaches 3 and 8 …

… along with a bicycle storage area by the other door.

Although these are marked on the outside, I wouldn’t describe the identifiers as prominent.

Indeed, when the doors are open the symbols disappear leaving just smaller ones on the doors themselves which can easily be missed.

Door markings on WMT’s Class 730s are much more prominent.

Immediately behind the cab there’s a pair of facing seats with a mini-table but I’m told these have been installed at the expense of a larger cab and drivers are not happy at its small size.

Those two lockable cupboards, this side of the seats in the photo above, are where a driver or a co-driver can store his/her bag such is the lack of room in the cab. It’s interesting to compare this layout to the Greater Anglia’s Class 720 with a larger cab and two more seats squeezed in.

Drivers open the doors at stations but the responsibility for closing them varies between the driver and the guard depending on the station. It all sounds like a fudge to resolve what has been a long running dispute with the unions which has been part of the reason for the delayed introduction.

There’s the usual audio visual screens/announcements with updates on journey progress and London Underground status.

Quite why the words Eton Riverside weren’t spelt out in full on the above display is a mystery although if the late Queen was still alive one might think it was a reference to her link with Windsor, I suppose.

I found the two loading/toilet utilisation screens a bit confusing with both displaying one after the other in all the coaches.

The Thameslink arrangement of showing all 12 coaches on one screen with an arrow showing which coach you’re in is much clearer and more understandable.

There’s another information screen either side of each door showing the journey details and the next station.

The door area is very wide and has a litter bin as well as other unidentifiable cupboards.

Another place where seats have been squeezed in is by the accessible toilet where a row of tip ups when in use makes for a very difficult walk through as is the case in many new trains.

Each seat pair has a gangway grab handle which is handy for standing passengers as well as others walking through the train if needing to hold on.

The luggage racks have clear bottoms to what now seems to be an industry standard.

The trains, which give a very smooth ride, are a welcome improvement on those they’re replacing (Classes 455, 456, 458 and 707) and let’s hope more than one will soon be introduced into service although it’ll be years, before all 90 (60 ten-coach and 30 five coach) trains of the £1 billion order are in service.

Not least because they haven’t all been built yet, all 769 SWR main line drivers have to be trained and agreement with the RMT has yet to be reached.

Introducing new trains on Britain’s railways takes time.

See Geoff’s video about the Arterio here and read Diamond Geezer’s report here.

Roger French

Blogging timetable: 06:00 TThS.

Comments are welcome but please keep them relevant to the blog topic, avoid personal insults and add your name (or an identifier). Thank you.

27 thoughts on “One Arterio finally in service

  1. Dear Sir
    I wish to complain about the late running of this blog. It was advertised to arrive at 0600 but was over an hour late. I do hope that it is not being run by AI.

    Yours etc

    Mr. Dis Gruntled.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. “We regret to advise technical difficulties caused a delay to our blogging service earlier this morning. This has now been rectified and normal service has resumed. Thank you for your patience”.
      (PS Delay Repay is not available on this service.)

      Liked by 1 person

  2. At long last although I suspect the ‘rush’ to get these in token service was to avoid a fine from DfT. In the end the operator missed the 31st December fine deadline so it will be interesting to see if this is actually imposed (will this be disclosed ?).

    As a regular user of the Windsor lines I look forward to travelling on these although they can’t be much of an improvement of the ‘popular’ class 707 units which were a Stagecoach operator initiative (remember those ?) with their excellent acceleration and reduced dwell times. The loss of these probably explains why in the latest period SWR only managed to operate 51.96% of trains on time on the Windsor lines (an all-time low ?). However as Roger points out it will take years to get the whole fleet in service.

    I agree it’s a pity not to have drop down tables (although the 707s didn’t have these either) and hopefully the bins will be large enough to dispose of coffee cups etc.

    And what of the future of the 458s ? I understand a couple of units have returned from the workshops but no sign of these entering service. With the reduced timetable will they ever or face the same fate as the 442s.

    Anyway good luck with the 701s and I look forward to travelling on them.

    Martin W

    Like

    1. I’m pleased to report that having travelled on them a couple of times they’re better than the 707s. The seats much more comfortable than the dreaded basic ironing boards and legroom seems a bit better. Plus of course they have toilets!

      Steve

      Like

  3. I travelled on the 1253 ex Waterloo yesterday (Wednesday). I suppose they’ll do . . . smooth for sure, but the seats were a bit hard and upright for me. The lack of seat bays and with those in place not aligned with windows is disappointing. better than the Greater Anglia 720s, but not much.

    Give me a Siemens unit any day; 442s; 450s are better, and the LNWR 350s, even the 350/2s, are superior indeed . . . even at around 2 hours, Euston-Crewe is quite acceptable, and way, way cheaper than an Avanti Pendolino!!

    Like

    1. That’s a bit like comparing apples with pears, surely. These are inner suburban units, not outer-suburban/long distance trains. A more accurate comparison would be with the 455, 458 or 707.

      Like

      1. Been on the Greater Anglia version, seats with no view at the carriage end seating was not enjoyable, however at least SWT has gone for 2+2 seating, but they are missing the arm rest, so sitting next to someone else is going to cosy. Hopefully the frozen loo, I experienced with Greater Anglia won’t affect the SWT set, but I doubt it. Overall like the Greater Anglia set, a new train with very bad execution in it’s design and layout, BR could at least design train’s.

        Like

        1. 720s are far better than the 317s they replaced, to be fair. BR was capable of designing utter crap too, just look at Pacers or the 3+2 seated Class 150 Sprinters…

          Like

  4. A good review. Having sampled these trains a couple of times I can’t wait for them to enter service. They’ll be a significant upgrade from the 455s and 458s.

    One point – the cab wasn’t shortened to squeeze in more seats. There aren’t more seats. It was shortened to shorten the length of the coach, which would otherwise be significantly longer than the intermediate coaches. Not doing so would have meant that a 2 x 5 coach train wouldn’t be able to fit into P1-4 at Waterloo. It also means that the doors will always stop in the same position irrespective of whether a train is 2 x 5 or 1 x 10 formation. Important for the high intensity metro-style service that was planned pre-Covid.

    None of the parties come out of the sorry saga of introduction well, be it the manufacturer, SWR with its awful track record of trying to introduce new / refurbished trains, or the unions. In particular ASLEF who accepted a significant pay rise for their members in return for operating the doors then did all they could to stall the trains introduction indefinitely, by making absurd claims like the parked wiper blocks the view of signals.

    Steve

    Like

  5. All these endless delays have to pick up costs and no doubt they will be passed on with higher fares

    Why is it nothing can be delivered on time and on budget in the UK

    Why are the trains a more standardized design. Even under BT they managed to have a standard carriage design. All these variants just add to costs

    Like

    1. It really has been an awful few years for SWR. The shockingly poor change management, delays and let down passengers are a case study in how not to do things. No doubt the managers will “learn lessons” while counting their wads of cash in the feather bedded railway market. Passengers and taxpayers deserve better.

      Gareth Cheeseman

      Like

  6. Misread the shot of the occupancy levels. Thought it showed “toilet occupancy low”. The mind boggles (spot the unintentional pun)!

    Like

  7. I’ve sampled one and while they’re not terrible they’re not great either. The frustrating thing is that a little more attention to design and they could have been so much better.

    Mounting the seat right up against the side and each other is a prime example. As per the blog it means if you sit straight in a window seat there’s nowhere to put your feet. This could have been solved by using spacers like the Elizabeth line or 458’s. As is it’s going to be very cosy with your neighbour. I imagine customers on the Reading line in particular won’t be very impressed given the longer journey times.

    Surfblue

    Like

  8. I hope we dont get these on the SWR” main line” to Basingstoke and Al.ton.
    We need drop down tables and still the coat hooks we lost with the Siemens trains.
    But more important is step extensions to reduce the gap from the platform.
    malcolm chase, Fleet

    Like

  9. I’ve made this point to SWR, but it’s worth repeating here, the disappointment at the decision to place this solitary 601 in service on a route that already “enjoys” more modern trains, rather than use it on the routes the 40yr old 588s serve and which this new class is primarily intended for. Passengers expected to continue enduring using services operating antiquated 588 stock shouldn’t be expected to pay the same as everyone else travelling in far more modern trains.

    Like

  10. One of the new features that was going to be introduced with the Class 701 is assisted braking and door opening, which was supposed to bring the train to a stop and open the doors automatically, reducing station dwell times. That all seems to have gone quiet now and I wonder if it will ever actually happen.
    Steven Saunders

    Like

  11. Are these for all SWR routes , or essentially those lines planned for the proposed XR2 service. for which at 10 coaches they might be better designed. Bedding them in on the Windsors seems reasonable and I assume the timetable use allows for driver training (Indeed I saw one passing/stopping at Basingstoke just before Christmas ) on such training duties running I think all down to Bornemouth. I assume for training too on Windsors they can then be easily route tested etc around the Hounslow Loop , Then the Richmond/Kingston loop.

    Like

    1. By the time XR2 is built, never mind given the go-ahead, this fleet will likely be over halfway through it’s design life if not more. I don’t think any prospective Crossrail lines have anything to do with the 701s.

      blue

      Like

        1. Hopefully unlike the Ford Fiesta XR2, Crossrail 2 will offer real performance rather than just impressive marketing 😀

          ….If it ever gets built, of course!

          blue

          Like

  12. Why, though, does someone have to forego a window? It seems like we’re made to feel lucky there is even a train these days, let alone a half decent one.

    Like

  13. I thought they were OK for short suburban journeys but not for long journeys from places like Wokingham. The journey is normally slow and tedious enough but only alleviated by the fact that you can buy a coffee or tea before the journey and you’ve got a table to put it on and also to watch something on your phone. Now it looks as though you’re going to be squashed up against the window with nowhere to put anything on for an hour and a quarter. I, for one, am certainly not looking forward to this.

    Lawrie Davidson

    Like

  14. By doing away with the spacer between seats , it will make people spread out into the gangway, thereby reducing the width. A false economy.

    Like

Comments are closed.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑