The bus gate that earns £1.5 million

Tuesday 15th August 2023

The UK’s highest earning bus gate reportedly responsible for a third of all the country’s bus lane fines brought in over £1.5 million in revenue for Brighton & Hove City Council last year.

Around 38,500 fines were issued to motorists for violating the regulations working out at just over 100 infringements a day. If everyone had paid the full £70 fine (rather than the discounted £35 rate for early payment) it would have brought in just under £2.7 million.

I know the location of this bus gate well in York Place – on the main north south entry/exit into the city centre but as the so called ‘controversial’ bus gate is criticised by motorists for its inadequate signage I couldn’t resist popping along to take a look and see how justified such whinging might be.

Brighton has an excellent network of bus priority measures not least bus lanes towards the city centre giving buses, taxis and cyclists exclusive use of what until a couple of years ago was the main northbound A23 exit from the city, changed when a new traffic management scheme was introduced by the City Council.

Brighton & Hove was in the vanguard installing bus lane enforcement cameras, doing so as soon as regulations permitted local authorities to issue fines for such violations. Over the years the media has regularly highlighted the significant income generated from these cameras as well as the city having a high tariff parking regime together with effective enforcement.

The Council uses the income these measures generate to fund tendered bus routes and the concessionary fares scheme so it’s a useful virtuous circle of raising income from errant motorists to subsidise bus fares and provide additional bus routes to meet social objectives.

So, just how effective are the signs warning motorists they’re about to pay £35, or even £70, if they drive through the ‘gate’?

The first thing to observe is almost all north-south traffic has already been filtered out of the road concerned making it buses, taxis and for local access only. It’s on the west side of Pavilion Gardens south of St Peters Church whereas all through traffic is now routed on the east side of the Gardens.

Traffic from the north has long been diverted at Preston Circus (top of the map above), east along Viaduct Road then south past The Level and down the eastern side of St Peter’s Church, so only local traffic from one of the side roads in the stretch of London Road south of Preston Circus will be heading south towards St Peters Church.

… and at the junction itself.

South of the junction to the west of St Peter’s Church local traffic can join for access to Trafalgar Street but as you approach that junction there are two signs advising you of the bus gate ahead.

Here’s the first (marked “2′ on the map)…

… and here’s the second at the junction.

Heading northwards towards the junction with Trafalgar Street, here’s the first sign (marked “3”)…

… and here’s the second sign…

… and here’s the third sign.

If motorists are unable to see or pay heed to these signs, including the one captured in the above photograph, they simply shouldn’t be driving. Are they going to ignore No Entry signs and one-way streets, going round roundabouts anti-clockwise, the wrong way up dual carriageways and other misdemeanours too?

The Argus newspaper article quotes Councillor Muten explaining with cctv enforcement only introduced in 2021 with the new traffic scheme “it takes a year or two to settle down after an initial spike” and sure enough the number of tickets issued in the first six months this year is 25% down on the same period last year. Which in some ways, is a shame, as that’s a 25% drop in income to pay for sustainable transport measures.

But the ideal is to have no infringements and effective compliance with regulations. As you stand in York Place for a time, as you can see from the photographs, it doesn’t feel there’s an issue at all and generally throughout the city, compliance with bus priority measures is very good thanks to effective enforcement. And that is probably why York Place ended up as the UK’s top netting bus gate simply because it’s being rigorously enforced with cameras and motorists are either chancing it knowing they’re in the wrong or fail to understand road signs.

Yesterday’s Argus newspaper carried a story about a motorist who won an appeal against a sign further south of York Place which the Traffic Penalty Tribunal adjudicator found to be lacking clarity despite the City Council stating the signs go above and beyond legal requirements.

The Marlborough Place bus gate has one advanced sign identifying local access ahead but at the actual gate allows buses and taxis only and other traffic must turn off leading to the adjudicator believing “I accept that motorists seeking ‘access’ may not appreciate that they subsequently fall into the category of ‘other traffic’.” Yeah, right. If I’m not a bus or taxi, I’m “other traffic” in my Highway Code book of signs.

I wonder how many other towns and cities are enforcing their regulations so assiduously as Brighton & Hove, which with modern technology doesn’t have to be an arduous task with much of it automated.

So, rather than a bus gate being “controversial” as it “rakes in one third of UK’s bus lane fines” I’d say well done Brighton & Hove City Council for leading the way and doing an excellent job. Long may that continue …… and keep funding those socially needed bus routes and concessions.

Roger French

Blogging timetable: 06:00 TThS and Su DRT extras.

55 thoughts on “The bus gate that earns £1.5 million

  1. Nice to see Brighton has the chutzpah to enforce these gates. Here in NYC, any attempt to enforce bus lanes or even regular street laws is seen as an utter violation of the Constitution and liberty and freedom and etc.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. It’s not the southern approach from London Road that’s the problem, that’s clearly market. It’s the northern approach from the Church Road/King & Queen pub in Marlborough Place.

      Here the road markings advise local traffic, buses etc. But go past the King & Queen in Marlborough Place heading towards St George’s Place and it becomes very ambiguous. The signs are absolutely NOT clear (I’ve been driving for 40 years and in Brighton 25 years and have perfect vision)

      If you continue from Marlborough Place on to St Georges Place, as local traffic would (think deliveries to those shops) you’ll trigger a fine. And of course you’d obviously get fined again should you continue on and ignore the massive Buses Only sign plastered on the road at the bottom of Trafalgar Street.

      However, if you come down North Road and turn left into St George’s Place you WON’T be a fined as local traffic is allowed to turn left into that road, but not go straight ahead into that road from Marlborough Place.

      Roger French needs his eyes tested and he needs to understand the issue fully. I’ve had both my fines for delivery in St George’s Place overturned by the Ombudsman because the signs are not explicit

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Sound excellent! – particularly as the other part of the bargain is well fulfilled in Brighton, i.e a good public transport network.

    Whatever happened, by the way, to the ‘Brighton Bus Metro’? – the network of ‘at least every 10 minutes’ buses which covered most of Brighton and Hove, with large clear system maps at stops, and clear route branding on the buses. I found it a great help in getting around quickly: because the overall bus system is so comprehensive, the ‘all routes’ map does look a bit impenetrable, and the frequent services do not stand out. I had hoped that the branding would be extended to the bus stops, and that the opportunity might be taken to include some other corridors which, with the extra publicity, could have been increased to ‘at least every 10 minutes’ – the road to the sea front and Rottingdean, buses to Lewes, the 2/2a etc..

    Still even without this, Brighton and Hove has really good, well-used buses and trains, with lots of real-time information screens, and the great ‘1 stop shop’.

    Like

  3. It’s unfortunate that so few residents realise that the income from the fines helps to pay for concessionary passes and tendered routes. If the Council could publicise these benefits in the weeks before the fines data is published it might help reduce the antagonism. As ever, the more people that can make journeys by bus, using passes and/or tendered routes, the fewer “other vehicles” there are to clog up the roads and pollute the air.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Sat Navs guide us the quickest routes. They do not allow for bus gates. This is planned extortion and organised crime!

      Like

      1. Sat Nav is a guide not your gospel for a route. The excuse of the Sat Nav sent me that will isn’t a valid excuse.

        Like

  4. In my day job, I often use that area just like the glazier is to attend to property in the area which makes some areas nigh on impossible to reach and get near enough. The signage I agree is clear.

    Like

  5. Can’t see any problem with the signage – it’s plentiful and clear. But there should be some kind of dispensation for drivers who have to enter the area to do essential maintenance etc.

    Like

  6. I have no problem with Brighton’s traffic control measures. What I do have a problem with, as an occasional visitor to the city, is the lack of Park & Ride facilities on the approaches to Brighton and Hove. Most other cities I visit have well-organised, clearly signposted P&R with frequent bus departures. Brighton and Hove Council and their predecessors have had decades to sort this out and reduce the volume of traffic heading into the city.

    Like

    1. There are multiple rail, bus and coach routes converging on Brighton. If these do not suit and someone really has to use their car, they could park at a rail station and train in.

      Like

  7. In re Brighton Park & Ride …. I believe that there is no suitable land available within the City Council area to provide the car park.
    However, there appears to be land available north of the A27 bypass which is outside the City …. I would’ve hoped that common sense might have applied here.
    With a full day car park charge currently at £15 or thereabouts …. that’d keep plenty of traffic away!!

    Like

    1. I believe the issue is how close the South Downs protected area comes to the urban area of Brighton itself, I think it may run right up to the A27 by-pass so getting anything (even a Park & Ride site) approved outside the Council boundary appears nearly impossible. This has been an ongoing issue for more than 20 years with Brighton being unable to secure any site for proper Park & Rides despite multiple attempts, they did use the Withdean Stadium car park but it was never big enough and much to difficult to find to be a realistic mainstream option.

      Like

  8. I feel a sense of divided loyalty. I am both a motorist and a public transport user (and walker and cyclist) and I wish to remain having that choice. I make the decision on mode based on where I’m going, available options, journey times and cost (including number of passengers).

    I’m a follower of rules by nature and supporter of enforcement of those rules. On the other hand, I feel that the punishments handed out to errant motorists are disproportionate both in cost and in how they’re chased down for what are often errors, compared to what I see as wilful crimes, such as shoplifting, vandalism and even robbery and assault. The motorist is an easy target.

    My point is that persecuting the motorist will not turn them into public transport supporters. In fact it’s more likely to make them vote against the bus priority schemes we need if the fines are too high, accidental contravention too easy or the benefits of the scheme unclear. We have to draw a careful line.

    In this case the signage seems clear enough and the £35 early payment fine reasonable but I detect more and more charges and higher and higher fines for more and lesser motoring contraventions.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. I think the figures are wrong because as someone who uses those roads every day I hardly see drivers go through the bus gates now. Something fishy is going on here..

    Like

  10. I used to live in Ipswich and there was a bus gate in Dog’s Head Street which was almost routinely ignored, on purpose. Occasionally Traffic Wardens would be stationed there to pounce on people but it wasn’t regularly enforced. Conversely on the other side of town there was a peak-hours only bus lane which most drivers avoided at all times!

    In London, the Uxbridge Road was a nightmare. It had a bus lane along its length which was fine, however it passed through several boroughs each of which had different times for its operation. So, for instance, one could be driving into London perfectly legally on a bus lane at 2pm, only to find that it had suddenly morphed into a 24-hour lane. Who would notice the signage for that? A lot of people got caught out.

    Like

  11. I think “Other Traffic” may not be the best wording – it feels a bit mealy-mouthed. Here in Leeds there’s a very similar bus gate I pass regularly, and the signage says “All Routes” for the left turn, which feels a lot clearer. (The straight ahead route of course has the blue “buses/taxis/cycles permitted” sign and the BUS GATE wording on the road, but as general traffic you hardly need those once you’ve seen the “All Routes” direction.)

    Like

    1. Yes I was thinking of the wording “All Traffic”, with buses etc being the exception. I also think that most people will not understand what “Bus Gate” painted on the road means, there’s no gate for starters. I would prefer “Bus Lane” or “Buses Only” and red painted road surface as being more meaningful, plus No Entry signs (with an exception plate) never seem to be used in these situations, snd everyone knows what that means.

      Like

      1. Red surface treatment has no legal value, but is a way of reinforcing the message. The problem is that where it is used it can then be used as a challenge to enforcement in nearby areas where it is not used (e.g. just over a council boundary). In general there has been less of an issue with inspectors overturning penalty charges in recent years, where they meet the legal requirements.

        Like

  12. The bus gate is close to the railway station. I wonder if non-locals trying to get to and from the station get caught up in this?

    I also got caught in Bath going over Pulteney Bridge which is Buses Only. I was going round the one way system trying to follow all the signs when I found myself going over the bridge. I realised this just before the bridge, but there was nowhere to turn without holding up the traffic, so I had no option but to continue. Not quite the same as in Brighton, but it can easily be done.

    Like

  13. The issue was, as the Traffic Adjuster rightly stated, not the definition of “Other Traffic”, but the limit and purpose of “Access”, which was not defined.

    Like

  14. Isn’t amazing that anything which favours buses over the motorist is “controversial”. I have two relatives who would use “drive in” public toilets if such things existed, but even they respect the need to both control traffic and give buses priority in Brighton. They actually park up in Worthing and use the 700!

    The problem may come when the revenue shortfall from enforcement fails to meet “target”, and may create a problem of it’s own.

    It is also shameful that on the back of the recent Uxbridge by-election, both main parties appear quite happy now to ditch absolutely anything that may lose the motorist vote. Other than Nottingham, I wonder how few towns and cities will ever dare be as brave as Brighton.

    Like

  15. Reading this, it did occur to me that some motorists might be confused about the term “bus gate”. When I read the word in this piece, my initial reaction was to expect some physical gate or bollard (which exist in numerous other places). Having said this, it would be tricky to ignore all the signs which make it pretty clear that it is buses/taxis only beyond this point.

    Like

  16. I’m a cyclist and bus user in Brighton
    but I have to say that these static pictures, where the photographer has clearly waited for a clear shot paint and unrealistic picture of the location. There are a lot of pedestrians in the area, bikes, skateboards etc. In the pics you can see a bike on the pavement, a guy on the edge of the pavement etc. There are too many distractions for drivers to think about what a ‘bus gate’ might mean. A bus lane is well known , and drivers won’t drive into it. I still don’t know what a bus gate is , if someone told me to draw one, I wouldnt be drawing anything like this so I’d be looking out for this ‘bus gate’ thing, while avoiding the bikes and pedestrians. Even at pace of my bike it’s hard to understand, for a tourist driver (Brighton is a tourist town) it would be very difficult.

    Like

  17. On my last visit by automobile to Brighton after trying to find a car park I had to settle for Churchill Square Shopping Centre . All ok until you try to find the pedestrian route out of the dam place . They certainly try to keep you in the place . “You’ll never leave” should be their slogan!

    Like

  18. I share the view that ‘bus gate’ is a remarkably unhelpful label. ‘Gate’ is a simple straightforward word with a very clear meaning, which includes being a physical obstacle to progress. Using it in a context where there is no such obstacle is a recipe for confusion and cognitive dissonance which is quite unnecessary.

    That’s even more important where there is more information to process than in those Brighton examples. The City of London, for example, has part time bus gates so drivers need to read and assimilate the plates on the signs as well as the signs themselves.

    The bus priority measures themselves are absolutely the right thing to do – but nothing is gained from such a poor choice of wording.

    Like

    1. I understand that the wording is legally prescribed, and measures are unenforceable if it is not used.

      Like

  19. Of course Mr French was the managing director of the Brighton & Hove Bus Company which was during his time… and still is… heavily subsidised by the council.

    Like

    1. I’m not sure I’d call 5% of turnover from the city council in respect of the small number of bus routes it deemed socially necessary “heavily subsidised” and which were operated after a competitive tender process and indeed towards the end of my tenure passed to Compass Bus and the Big Lemon on a re-tender.

      Liked by 1 person

  20. I don’t think you’ll find it is. Most B & H routes are commercially operated. The council just pay for concessionary passholders- which is a user subsidy, not one to the bus company.

    Like

  21. Perhaps the bigger challenge here will be from the battleground of the next general election. Rumours already abound that the Tories, fresh from their ULEZ Uxbridge success, will seek to make these measures an election battleground. Cloaking themselves as standing up for hard pressed motorists – the self-same motorists who’ve not had a fuel duty increase for 13 years. We’re already seeing this with the review of Low Traffic Neighbourhoods – not helped by foil hat brigade for whom every move to limit car use is part of some shadowy move by the World Economic Forum to curb every individual freedom including the inalienable right to drive wherever and whenever.

    Certainly, there could be a lot more done in terms of promoting the holistic benefits of road traffic schemes by local authorities…

    Like

  22. I think there is a signage issue here. The signs themselves generally clear, but the road painting is much less so.

    The painting on the road says “Bus Gate”. This is transport planners jargon, with I think no examples in the highway code (maybe not even in signage manuals). Don’t use jargon on signage/wayfinding (seen all too often on yellow construction signs).

    What does “bus gate” mean to the average motorist? Especially English as second language? I would suggest not much.

    At least this is not a northern city, where Gate can mean street–i.e. this is the way to the street called “Bus” (in the same way there are signs to the street called Mickle in York).

    Should be painted “Buses Only” or something similar and clear. (Also need to check that sat navs are correctly routing around the restriction).

    I also think the blue roundel prohibition signs should also be a) bigger b) backlit for dark rainy nights.

    Absolutely in agreement with policy and concept. Execution, only a B- at best, in my opinion. Need to do better for a important landmark scheme.

    Like

    1. Miles T I would agree with your comments and the B- rating for execution, but I would be generally pro bus and supportive of improving public transport options in our cities. But the problem with the signage is a lack of a consistent national standard. Motorists are used to a standard set of signs across the whole country and these have all been designed with clarity as a priority. Local efforts and jargon or one off Local Authority “dialect” signage is bound to cause confusion especially in a place with many visitors from out of town. Daft need to establish a standardised lexicon and sign design principles for all bus priority situations. Busandtrainuser takes issue with motorists not understanding Road signs which is fair enough but this would be more reasonable if the signs were to national standard and not just local experiments.

      Like

  23. I think these blue bus only signs are too small and easily obscured by other distractions whether vehicles, pedestrians and working out what is happening.

    NO ENTRY ⛔ signs with an exception for buses would be much better.

    Like

    1. The DfT took the view that they wanted signs to say what you could do, rather than what you could not and in particular disliked diluting the no entry message.

      Like

    2. It’s not possible to have a No Entry sign with more than one exemption to it (e.g. No entry except buses is OK, as is no entry except cycles, but no entry except buses & bikes isn’t). As both cycles and taxis are permitted to use this bus gate, only the blue sign is permissible.

      Like

  24. It turns out that the road markings are to national standard and are not local experiments – to be found in line 15 in the table which is Part 6 of Schedule 9 to The Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016

    A Bus Gate marking designates a:

    Road or part of a road with access permitted only for buses and other vehicles when so indicated by any of the signs at items 10, 33 to 35 and 37 to 40 in the sign table in Part 2 of Schedule 3

    That doesn’t make ‘gate’ a less bad choice of word, but it does mean Brighton can’t be blamed for it.

    https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/362/schedule/9/made

    Like

    1. OK, so Bus Gate is explicitly is in the rulebooks, but probably not common enough for most to be aware of it, and seems to be a relatively recent addition (which, I suspect, is why the “jargon” slipped through–insufficient care and attention on the part of legislative authors at DfT to create something better).

      Creating “cognitative dissonance” in a compliance situation (through use of the unfamiliar) is also not good practice to optimise compliance (which is what is wanted) rather than post hoc sanction (fines).

      And there seems to be a consensus in the comment stream here that the rest of the signage is a bit on the small side with a potential to be lost in general street and signage clutter. I would suggest that varying the colour of the road paving in the gate area to reinforce the distinctive road utilisation would also help. Or paving with a different material outright (block paving maybe?)

      Like

      1. Well, it depends on what you mean by “relatively” – there have been bus gates around here for at least 20 years, and possibly longer.

        Like

        1. Judging by the format of the URL posted, maybe was added in 2016, hence I suggested “recently”. But I haven’t checked back in detail to the website for this law or walked back from that to check previous legislation, so it may be an evolution of previous legislation.

          Or the earlier implementations were local experiments, only codified nationally in 2016.

          Ultimately, still uncommon enough that some drivers won’t have experienced if, even if they re-read highway code regularly (most people don’t, of course).

          Like

          1. Bus gates were in the 2002 edition of Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions, so hardly recent. This is the national instruction manual for road signs.

            Like

            1. They have been around for a long time. But the point is perhaps how technology has changed their appearance. Previously rising bollards protected the bus gate with suitable engineering either side. All very obvious. But camera enforcement has created a different environment which allows the bus gate (or should this section of road be a bus lane) to blend seamlessly into the surroundings. Not a bad thing I agree but in my opinion there needs to be a bit greater visibility of the bus gate. It’s all a bit covert. Bus priority doesn’t need to be covert and should be bloomin obvious. Unless you want to generate income to pay for services….

              Like

        2. Part of the issue may be whether there is anything more gate-like than words painted on the road.

          This for example is a bus gate as it was ten years ago (though not referred to as such)

          https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.5095391,-0.080204,3a,75y,291.96h,87.6t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sFv-Y-GUfQHaTS_MT6ySfEA!2e0!5s20120501T000000!7i13312!8i6656?entry=ttu

          Which has long since lost the physical barrier

          https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.5095382,-0.0801933,3a,75y,294.3h,88.83t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sUiZObEuE5cwV676QXvtlpQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu

          If the phrase entered the signage regulations at time when there was an expectation that the physical environment would provide clearer indications, its use was perhaps more understandable. The Brighton pictures in the main post have none of that – the junctions are wide open and the way ahead apparently clear. That’s not an excuse for failing to observe signs, but goes some way to explaining why ‘bus gate’ can communicate confusion rather than clarity.

          Like

  25. As a general principle it seems quite inappropriate for DfT to approve or encourage any signage or terminology or highway engineering practice that does not appear in the Highway Code.

    Like

  26. Whilst the bus gates are excellent for public transport, as a pedestrian I find the ‘other traffic’ gets to much priority at the pelican crossings on grand parade. Push a button on a pelican crossing to cross and you end up waiting several minutes before the lights change. Plus the bike lanes at the junction of Grand Parade and Marlborough Place converge with the pathway on the pedestrian crossings and cyclists zoom along oblivious to the danger they pose. Add that to the constant pavement clutter that B&H Council seem to accommodate, such as bike racks, giant bins and shop furniture, and pedestrians have a hard time getting anywhere in a reasonable amount of time. No wonder people resort to their cars!

    Like

  27. Having the misfortune to have to drive into Coventry occasionally, I’d love to see that here. In an incredible act of stupidly, even by local authority standards, the City Council decided to remove a significant proportion of it’s bus lanes a few years ago in an attempt to “reduce congestion”.

    At least Coventry’s excellent fleet of 140 fully electric double decks don’t add to pollution when they’re stuck in traffic now the bus lanes have gone!

    Like

  28. In the Marlborough Place example (shown in the newspaper article), what is “Local access only” – as seen on the road sign – intended to mean & where would that be found?

    Like

  29. Yes the signs are clearly visible when stood on the pavement or able to wait to photograph them. However, if you’re a driver stuck behind a bus the signs would be totally obscured. I also wonder how many of the fines are issued to tourists who fell into that trap, and then vow never to visit Brighton again. Like my nephew and his family. Bad news for a town built on tourism.

    Like

  30. I think it’s absolutely disgusting the council definitely doesn’t need any extra money from Bus Fine’s and getting money from the Less Well Off – Bus Lane’s shouldn’t even exist – Bus Lane’s wasn’t around year’s ago and definitely not needed now its just a money grabbing Bus Lane to get money off The Less Well Off and All Bus Lane’s should be permanently taken away – council are just money grabbers..

    Like

Comments are closed.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑