Thursday 1st October 2020
Pre Covid, Leicestershire County Council was pursuing a review of tendered bus routes across the county with a view to achieving £400,000 saving on its annual £2.4 million subsidy budget. This involved an area by area assessment of each route with public consultation workshops to discuss proposals.
One of these was in Coalville in October 2019 when a proposal to merge two rural routes was discussed: route 120 Leicester to Coalville and route 155 Coalville to Castle Donington.
Neither of these two-hourly frequency routes scored well on the County Council’s service review score card (cost per passenger/access to other services/journey purpose were all scored) with route 120 showing a ‘marginal’ case for continued support scoring 22 out of 35 while route 155 scored just 8 out of 35 showing a weak case for support.
Average single passenger journeys per trip on the 120 were between 9.5 southbound and 10.6 northbound at a subsidy per journey of £2.39 and on route 155 there were just 2.1 passengers southbound and 2.5 northbound per trip costing the Council £11.39 per passenger journey in subsidy.
The upshot was a newly numbered route 125 combining the 120 and 155 and thereby saving a bus with a slimmed down timetable comprising four journeys a day between Leicester and Coalville, two of which continue to Castle Donington. Route 155’s diversion to serve East Midlands Airport was withdrawn.
The new timetable was introduced on 24th February.
A month later in March came lockdown and six months on is still continuing, to an extent, with local restrictions in Leicester, so it wasn’t surprising to find the new route sparsely loaded when I took a ride at lunchtime earlier today.
My friend Simon Mathieson (Arriva Midlands’ Area Managing Director) alerted me to the extended route pointing out it’s now an attractive rural route with an end to end journey time approaching two hours so just the kind of route he knows I relish and guessed it needed my custom to appreciate what it has to offer.
I took the 12:00 journey from Leicester to Castle Donington where the scheduled arrival time is 13:57.
However, as you can see from the timetable, this includes a frustrating twenty minute pause in Coalville between a 12:55 arrival and 13:15 departure which pretty much puts a dampener on the convenience of making a through journey.
I subsequently found out this journey was retimed to add this long mid journey break following the public consultation last October to meet requests for two and a quarter hours shopping time in Coalville (off the 10:57 arrival from Castle Donington) rather than the originally planned two hours for shopping, with the journey originally timed to continue north at 13:00.
In the event no one boarded in Coalville to head back to Castle Donington this lunch time and the driver and I just sat out the twenty minutes. Although it did give me time to take a few photographs by Coalville’s magnificent clock tower.
And admire the rather impressive bus shelter displays with comprehensive timetable information and clear promotion of Arriva’s ticket offers.
I can’t imagine why shoppers need so much time to buy what’s needed in Coalville. It’s hardly a major shopping town; but that’s public consultation for you.
In the event we arrived slightly later than the 12:55 scheduled arrival in Coalville as we called into Roberts Travel Group’s (the operator of the 125) extensive garage and yard on the southern fringe of Coalville for a driver changeover.
I didn’t realise how extensive Roberts Travel Group’s fleet is, and sadly much of it was standing idle after the devastating impact of the pandemic during the summer. At least route 125 is bringing in some income along with school contracts.
Arriva Midlands also base some buses with Roberts as a Coalville outstation and It was interesting to catch a glimpse of three of Arriva’s new Mercedes coaches bound for Green Line sitting in the yard.
Back to my journey earlier today and we left Leicester on time at 12:00 with no one else on board picking up one passenger in the rather nice looking largish village of Anstey (makred with the right hand arrow on the map below) on the north western outskirts of Leicester, eighteen minutes into the journey.
She travelled to an extensive retirement home complex 13 minutes further along the route called Markfield Court on the edge of another largish village called Markfield (marked with the left hand arrow on the map above). This involves making a double run off the route, but proved worthwhile for that passenger.
The only other passenger we encountered on the entire journey got on as we approached Coalville and just travelled the short distance into the town centre, a journey which could have been undertaken on Arriva’s half hourly Coalville- Markfield-Leicester service.
Otherwise it was just me and the driver.
As well as passing through some decent East Midlands villages the route also passes through lovely Leicestershire countryside, especially north of Coalville where it’s not surprising passengers are few in number as the settlements served are sparse.
I can see why the former route 155 scored a weak case for continuation.
Not even serving the famous racetrack on the approach into Castle Donington helped.
I very much enjoyed my ride on the newly extended route 125. I know it’s not normal times but two short distance travelling passenger journeys on an almost two-hour journey doesn’t bode well. It won’t score much in the next review.
I reckon there might be another public consultation in Coalville coming up if things don’t improve.
Which will be a great shame.
PS: At Castle Donington I switched to take a ride on the trentbarton Skylink route for the short trip to Long Eaton station and how nice to immediately be struck by the presentation of a true quality product. And it got quite busy too as the route serves huge distribution warehouses on its way to Long Eaton and on to Nottingham.
My first thought was … If they wanted the northbound departure from to be 15 minutes later then why not just leave Leicester 15 minutes later and run straight through?
But actually, it probably isn’t relevant. With the Skylink running every 20 minutes between Leicester and Castle Donington, and doing the journey in about 1h05–1h10, compared to 1h40 on the 125, it will only be enthusiasts such as your good self who use the route all the way through. Even if you think about the people living in those small villages between Coalville and Castle Donington, it’s no use at all for them going into Leicester, because they need to turn around and come straight back. Even with the extra 15 minutes moved to Leicester, they haven’t got long enough to do anything. In fact, it doesn’t make sense to think of it as a service from Castle Donington to Leicester – it makes sense to think of it as still the old 120 and the old 155, that just happen to share a single vehicle for operational efficiency, I can’t think that more than the tiniest handful of passengers will use both halves of the route in any journey.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes; that all makes good sense. Thanks.
It appears that all Leicestershire CC has achieved is to ruin a usable two-hourly frequency between Leicester and Coalville which was costing them a reasonable £2.39 a passenger (not high for a rural service) and replace it with four journeys a day, one of which in each direction can’t be used by ENCTS passholders who must make up a large part of the potential market. Such passengers are unable to reach either Leicester or Coalville for morning shopping or appointments, which they probably would prefer over an afternoon stay in my experience.
Looks like a case of the dead wood (155) dragging down the saveable (120) to me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Leicestershire County Council aren’t famous for being pro-bus at the best of times, and their recent changes are solely about cutting costs with some lip service paid to mitigating the resulting impact, hence the 15 minute retiming at Coalville which allows them to pretend that they’re responding to user needs whilst at the same time decimating the service provision.
Just down the road the Hinckley-Ashby service has been reduced to Hinckley-Measham (and the frequency reduced), because clearly shoppers from the villages will be much more interested in using the facilities in the metropolis that is Measham rather than the supermarket and other shops in Ashby…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought councils and councillors were there to serve the people once most did but now it’s all we cannot afford too
Roger, I suspect your switch to Skylink was at Castle Donington rather than Coalville.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Doh! Many thanks Ian; post updated.
The problem is bus service have been run down to the point that they are a transport mode of last resort. People do not choose to use them they use them as they have no other choice. Buses are often not well turned out and are frequently scruffy and dirty. Publicity and marketing etc is almost no existent and the government and councils have no interest in them in spite of them being the most used form of transport, At least at present but with the decades long decline that may not last much longer. Frequencies of services are far to low and fares far to high for the very basic services on offer. You can add in breakdowns and poor timekeeping and an underlying instability in the services as well. There is very limited real time information and what there is frequently does not work. Bus station if they have not been removed are basic in the extreme and not maintained. Another problem is the long gaps and strange timetables as bus disappear for school service or are timed to fit around school hours then after that the routes start to be run down as they prepare to finish for the evening
Big changes are needed and that problem means some subsidy to start with to get people back onto buses. One need to look at total costs as well and not just direct costs. How much does pollution costs the UK. How much does congestion cost the UK. How much do accidents and road deaths cost the UK ?. WE also need integrated public transport which in general we do not have in the UK. Many rail station’s have no bus service to them or only a very infrequent service. Taxi services as well are often located away from the train and bus station. Total integration in many cases is not possible as rail stations are often poorly located away from the town centres. It also means buses have to run when people need them. All to frequently the bus service start to late and finish to early and are far to infrequent to be of use to working people
Bus services as well need to be seen as a network particularly fort fare paying passengers. The current free for all does not work. It did not work on the railways so it certainly is not working with buses. It also leads to a lot of inefficiency with buses frequently garaged miles away from the route they operate
If bus companies do not run a service that is of use to people they will not use them and that’s what we have t present. This results in a continual slow decline of services
A lot of work is going to be need to makes buses a transport mode of choice and the bus industry need much better management
There are exceptions of course but they are very few and far between