Saturday 9th May 2020
Week 7’s almost over as speculation grows about how the hell we’re going to get out of the lockdown travel conundrum of providing enough capacity as restrictions ease without compromising social distancing while also avoiding an exponential increase in motoring, congestion and pollution. Anticipation has built towards Johnson’s announcement on Sunday of the Government’s roadmap out of lockdown but I’m not confident it’ll get us out of the cul-de-sac we seem to be in. Even the Secretary of State for Transport hadn’t a clue what to do at the beginning of the week.
Take last Sunday’s Andrew Marr programme on BBC1. Grant Shapps drew the short straw for the customary Sunday morning Ministerial grilling on TV’s political programmes. He did his best to toe the Government’s well honed obsfucation about the care homes crisis, failures in PPE, lack of testing, appalling death rate etc etc before being given three minutes at the end of the programme to discuss his apparent specialist subject: transport. After trying to justify the lack of testing of arriving passengers at airports over the last couple of months Shapps was challenged by Marr on the thorny question of trains and social distancing….
Marr: If you’e going to enforce social distancing by 2 metres or whatever in trains then, as we heard earlier on, you’re going to have to cut people in a train by something like 12% of the norm which means the vast majority of commuters around the country will not be able to get to work by train. How are you thinking about doing this, how are you going to organise it?
Shapps: You’re absolutely right about the scale of the problem here, of course about 95% of commuters aren’t travelling at all now, we’ve only got key workers. The first thing is we’ll obviously expand the number of trains and buses running. The second thing to say is active travel is a very important part of this by which I mean cycling, walking and so on; we’ve seen a massive expansion….
Marr (interrupting the waffle): If you’re thirty miles away from work you can’t walk there.
Shapps: Of course
Marr: So will you, for instance be distancing people who are queueing at bus stops or distancing people who are queuing outside train stations and on platforms and then limiting the number of people who can get on to a train possibly by forward booking?
Shapps: So I’m looking at working with the train companies, unions and all the rest of it and there’s a series of different things we can do including for example staggering work times, working with business organisations to do that but I just want to make the point about bikes, you’re right not everyone will be able to cycle I totally accept that but there’s been a massive increase, I’ve been looking at the figures, hundreds of percent more people using the existing scheme where you can go to your employer and ask for a bike through that which you pay back through the loan and effectively before you pay tax. That’s a very popular scheme and active mobility is something we can do a lot more of.
And that was his solution. So now we know. Norman Tebbit was right all those years ago; the strategy is “on your bike”. I like cycling too but the future of mass transit? I don’t think so. And as someone rightly pointed out on social media, where are all the cycle racks in towns and cities for the “hundreds of percent” growth in use?
Train companies are gearing up for new timetables and schedules from next weekend, 17 May, which was always the date for the mid year timetable change, with reports circulating it’ll be a 70%, Saturday style, service with emphasis on commuter routes rather than inter-city. Graham Vidler, CEO of the Confederation of Passenger Transport advised in the organisation’s weekly update on Thursday “CPT has been in extensive discussions with ministers and officials this week about how we ramp up bus services as the economy begins to reopen. Clearly whatever social distancing measures remain in place for travelling on public transport will have a huge difference on capacity and I have been pushing ministers to provide clarity on this, alongside the necessary support to allow operators to run increased mileage without a significant increase in passenger numbers. We are making progress but there is still some more work to do.”
Staggering work times mentioned by Shapps in the interview is all very well and makes a lot of sense, but surely it’s going to need 2012 Olympics style coordination otherwise employers and businesses could all ‘stagger’ their times to the same ‘new’ and simply shift the peak to a new bulging off peak. Years of pre-planning went into the 2012 Olympics to avoid transport hotspots with high profile media, online and poster campaigns advising us all when peak hour London stations were likely to be busy with alternatives suggested as well as information at other venues around the country.
Developing this theme, on Wednesday, London TravelWatch held an ‘Emerging from lockdown’ webinar featuring, among others, Deputy Mayor for Transport, Heidi Alexander.
Heidi freely admitted she had no idea what to expect in the immediate future. “If anyone tells you that they know exactly what’s going to happen, they’re lying. We are in completely unprecedented times, short of New York, there is probably not a city in the world where the transport ecosystem is as complicated as it is in London and I think also that there are few cities where pre Covid the population had a similar tolerance to levels of overcrowding that it had in London. People put up with a lot in London if you think about the rush hour and this makes it a very very complicated picture as the Government eases the movement restrictions that it has placed on us all. It’s a difficult puzzle that we’re trying to fix at the moment. I sometimes feel as if at City Hall and TfL we’re trying to do a jigsaw puzzle in the dark, because at the moment the Government haven’t obviously set out their answers to some of the really really big problems that we’re all talking about at the moment. When are schools going to go back; is it just going to be primary schools or secondary schools; will it be all pupils in a year group or just some; what sectors of the economy are they going to open up first… non essential retail …those people over 70 and in vulnerable groups ….use of face coverings in crowded settings ….. I don’t have the answers to those questions because the Government hasn’t yet been clear as to what its answers are going to be. At the heart of it we’re not even clear for example as to whether the 2 metre social distancing requirement that we’ve become very very accustomed to is going to remain in place. So we’re all waiting with quite bated breath I would say for the Prime Minister’s speech on Sunday.”
It’s a bit concerning, like the Secretary of State for Transport, that the Mayor’s office and his Deputy in London responsible for transport, have no better clue of what’s likely to happen than pundits like myself. Surely they should be determining policy and a strategy for ending the lockdown not doing jigsaws in the dark?
Heidi did present an interesting chart showing the devastating impact of normal peak hour surges on the Underground (left hand blue spiky graph) and current demand (right hand side) showing the network capacity with either 2 metre social distancing (blue line on current service and red line on normal service) and 1 metre (green line). It’s not looking very good.
And then on Wednesday the PM himself was at it. In Prime Minister’s Questions London’s Chipping Barnet MP Theresa Villiers pointed out TfL’s announcements on the London Underground have been wrongly saying passengers shouldn’t be on the system unless they’re key workers (if you can’t work from home and your job continues then you need to get to work, key worker status or not) so she asked the Prime Minister to ask the Mayor to restore public transport capacity in London so her constituents can travel safely to keep as much of the economy going as possible.
Naturally, Theresa being a Tory, Johnson replied the honourable lady was quite right to raise it adding (and in complete ignorance of the implications of Heidi’s capacity limiting graphs) “a crucial part of our success now in getting transport to run safely will be running a bigger and more expansive tube service so that people can observe social distancing and we’ll certainly be working with the Mayor to try to achieve that though there must be, and we’ll come to this on Sunday and next week as well, there must be mitigations to help people (who) for reasons of social distancing cannot use mass transit; and there’ll be a huge amount of planning going into helping people to get to work other than by mass transit” and turning to the former Secretary of State for Transport, Johnson concluded “this should be a new golden age of cycling”. Maybe thinking Grayling would fix it so we’ll all be buying bicycles from shops that don’t sell bicycles, or naff ones from a dodgy supplier in Turkey?
I’m sure cycling and walking “and so on” as Shapps added (what other ‘active travel’ was he thinking of … swimming to work?) are going to be important, but make no mistake, they won’t make much of a dent in mass transit commutes such as Brighton to London. Not even e-scotters will do that – another diversionary discussion which absorbed the London Travelwatch panel in Wednesday’s session. A total red herring when the elephant in the room is solving the conundrum of social distancing and mass movement public transport being incompatible.
Still in London, the seldom positive RMT launched a campaign on Monday to demand a reversal of TfL’s “disgraceful” decision to deny free travel to London Underground’s cleaners.
And for once I’m in complete agreement with the RMT. I think it is a disgrace these so called “heroes” doing such “vital work” – making sure tube trains are clean with virus free surfaces – are outsourced to businesses usually paying minimum wages with precious few benefits and Tube style employment conditions. RMT General Secretary Mick Cash said “the hypocrisy towards Tube cleaners is breath-taking”. He’s right. Take cleaning back in house London Underground, and give the cleaners the free travel perk all other Underground workers enjoy. They’ll appreciate that more than a bit of weekly clapping, I bet.
Stagecoach published a ‘six point plan’ for the ‘new normal’ this week (makes a change from the ‘five pillars’ the Government prefers for these things). A concise summary might be… (1) rebuild confidence in mass transit with a move away from peak-time commuting to spread demand; (2) prioritise street space for walking, cycling and high capacity public transport as well as ‘mobility hubs’; (3) new strategies for High Streets; (4) lifestyle changes to replace car trips with public transport; (5) transformation of how transport journeys are taxed (polluters pay); (6) investment in decarbonisation including electric buses and release the potential for bus manufacturers.
Meanwhile as First West of England began downsizing it’s double deck fleet to a capacity of just 20 seats on each bus on Monday, First Bus in Scotland told BBC News “social distancing will be unsustainable” and “it would not be possible to run enough buses to comply with the current rules”. Commercial Director Graeme Mac Farlane added “the transport system is not going to be able to provide all of the normal capacity that people would expect to be there”.
Adding to the ‘how’s it ever going to work debate’ the Scotsman carried an article on Wednesday suggesting “event-style queuing systems” and “new one-way systems on platforms and boarding and alighting from trains” are likely “according to train operator Abellio”. The paper pointed out “this could reduce punctuality” and “space on trains is likely to be significantly cut” A spokesperson said “crowd management like we have for major events (like sporting fixtures or concerts) could be normal practice for the rest of the year. One way systems could be extended to passengers getting on and off trains perhaps using different doors. Passengers will also be encouraged not to stand up until the train reaches a station to prevent people crowding round doors”.
I’m not sure how that will work, as passengers boarding won’t see anyone at the door wanting to alight, so they’ll naturally start boarding and then clash with the alighters.
If train capacity “is reduced to 15-20%” of normal, as the article explains, I just don’t see how passengers will ever expect to get on a train from an intermediate station. They’ll have to gamble someone is going to alight, like waiting outside to get into Tesco, except trains may only be half hourly or hourly. Someone has also made the point that a 1,400 capacity Thameslink Class 700 train taking a full load at Brighton Station would mean a queue stretching for 1.7 miles of passengers keeping 2 metres apart – the distance from Brighton to the next station at Preston Park is only 1 mile.
Transport Focus have been beavering away with more surveys to identify attitudes to using public transport post Covid-19. The online 2,000 sample sized survey, which will be repeated weekly, showed an overwhelming 83% thought hand sanitiser should be available with 62% wanting social distancing in place which leads to the obvious thought, what if social distancing was in place but means you can’t travel due to lack of capacity, then what do you think?
Ominously other answers in the survey show 60% saying they’ll drive more rather than use public transport (and air quality proponents hope congestion was going to be a thing of the past?) with 51% saying they will cycle and walk more rather than use public transport.
Mask wearing was not quite so clear cut, with 51% not happy using public transport unless passengers are required to wear a mask but in the same sample size only 28% will be wearing a masks outside for “my own and for others’ safety”.
Overall 24% said there’d be happy to travel again by public transport “as soon as travel restrictions are relaxed” which doesn’t strike me as a very encouraging result for anyone banking on a financially sound short term future for public transport.
The Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) also weighed in with some not-so-pleasant thoughts on Monday suggesting peak hour fares needed to be raised. Among its recommendations the IFS said the usual logic of promoting public transport use – to cut congestion and pollution – “could be reversed in order to limit the spread of the virus on packed commuter trains and buses, especially in London. The government could alter the relative prices of different types of commutes to better reflect this new reality. Examples would be to increase the relative price of commuting at peak times on the London tube and bus network, or to suspend the London congestion charge for drivers,” it said in its report.
It’s becoming clear bus and train companies must tread a fine line between reassuring passengers what measures are being taken to clean and sanitise vehicles to make them safe to travel in while at the same time not overdoing the message to the extent it makes a bus and train look like a murder scene, or worse still there’s been a radiation leak from a nuclear reactor.
I saw a classic example of this with a bus cleaner hard at work in full hazmat suit attire in what I guess was meant to be a reassuring tweet with accompanying video from TrawsCymru during the week. Personally I felt distinctly un-reassured just watching it let alone travelling on board. I can’t help thinking if it’s that bad at the end of the day, what’s it like if I travelled mid afternoon! See what you think on this link.
The supermarkets have shown the way; they offer a welcome but at the same time demonstrate good safe hygiene practices and I feel quite comfortable doing the shopping.
Prentice of Haddington promoted an interesting experimental solution on Monday comprising a plastic protective screen between certain pairs of seats. They explained “once the design is approved we will aim to fit these wherever possible on our buses to protect our passengers and aid social distancing”.
In other positive news this week, Tuesday was ‘Show Your Appreciation For Bus And Coach Workers’ day organised by the Confederation of Passenger Transport (CPT). It was lovely to see social media full of praise for the new found public transport heroes, now rightly dubbed ‘key workers’ (even those outsourced cleaners were involved) including over fifty tweets by CPT featuring front line and back room staff across a range of companies from all over the country. Some featured in regional media which was good and even Danny Boyle got in on the campaign with a video clip in a tweet giving a shout out to his local bus route the 524 between Bury and Bolton via Radcliffe.
Also this week Chiltern Railways caught up with GTR and Northern by adding a ‘Thank you NHS’ message’ to its train fleet number 168111…..
…. and preparations got underway at Network Rail and its contractors to shortly begin rebuilding Gatwick Airport’s rail station and realise long laid plans to substantially increase its capacity … but just as Virgin Atlantic followed British Airways in announcing they’re mothballing their operation at the airport with 3,000 workers redundant. Sadly the third largest airline at Gatwick, Norwegian Air is also grounded and not in good financial health. It makes sense to press on with this station expansion while passenger numbers are much reduced thereby causing minimal inconvenience as train services are also reduced in any event; but there’s no doubt this refurbished station won’t be needed in its new enlarged form for many many years to come.
Following its Back Britain’s Coaches campaign, CPT announced on Thursday the coach tourism industry needs £65 million each month to stave off bankruptcy for many coach operators. That might sound like an awful lot of money but contextualising it a bit, it’s roughly two and a half a day’s worth (instead of a month’s worth) of financial support the rail industry is receiving which is normally also in the tourism and leisure travel market. The best way forward in the short to medium term for many coach companies might be to utilise their vehicles and drivers as back up for the many buses (and even trains) which are going to overload with returning commuters if the new socially distanced public transport world becomes a reality.
Some are already on to this, and I’ve featured the techy company Zeelo in previous blogpost round ups and they’re still at it, sending emails encouraging me to hire bespoke coaches to get my employees safely to their work place.
I also spotted Grey’s of Ely (Est.1947) also explaining last week how their reduced capacity would work with a poorly loaded but nicely socially distanced coach. Covid safe; financially unsound.
Meanwhile England’s tram systems got their promised bail out this week with £30 million for a 12 week period back dated to mid March; but it wasn’t enough for some of them including Tyne & Wear who are concerned its share of the pot (£8.6 million) won’t be enough to fill the £10 million hole in its budget. Tobyn Hughes. managing director, said “the government’s funding goes a long way towards that and is very welcome, but it still leaves a funding gap that we need to close”.
Characteristically Mayor Burnham, who receives £11.6 million, said he was “struggling to find words of support about this decision” adding “at the start, we were told to spend what we needed to provide essential services, but now we find out we only have three-quarters of the income Metrolink needs to run at its current reduced services for key workers and essential journeys”. Burnham added once the funding ends in early June, “we will simply not be able to continue running Metrolink. The public should be under no illusions that mothballing the largest light rail network in the country remains a very real possibility.” Bearing in mind Blackpool have done just that with the parallel bus route adequately providing a replacement, it might be an interesting experiment if Burnham went ahead with his threat, especially if passenger numbers are still minimal. Something for all those coaches lying idle around the country to get their wheels into … and much cheaper per mile too.
A few other news snippets from the week include LNER reporting it’s now using new electronic whistles to dispatch trains….
…. apparently they’re much safer to use, if not quite so traditional as the old style. In a Covid-19 world it’s better to avoid hand to mouth contact. Give the whistle a play via this video clip on this tweet to see what you think.
If you’re nostalgic for a good old dot-to-dot puzzle during lockdown, Avanti West Coast obliged on Tuesday with this puzzle to complete:
And a shout out to the team at First Kernow whose engineers have hurriedly converted their publicity vehicle into a mobile clinic for NHS Cornwall’s newborn baby screening team enabling them to continue their work but now out in the community during the pandemic. What a great idea and gesture.
This week’s look in on an area comes courtesy of East Midlands resident and bus industry follower Daniel Stone who contacted me during the week with news of bus operations in his home area…..
My local operator, Trentbarton, in addition to the usual measures such as more stringent cleaning regimes and – for the first time – installation of cab screens which the company had always shied away from until now, one measure I was particularly impressed to see was the extension and diversion of certain journeys on buses in and out of Nottingham at key times to serve the Queens Medical Centre Hospital, providing new direct links at core times for the heroes deep in the thick of this crisis, the NHS staff who are working extra hard to keep us safe and fighting fit.
My local Stagecoach Depot at Mansfield has been making great use of the extra capacity introduced when taking the ‘pronto’ service in house after Trentbarton relinquished their share, by utilising spare Enviro 400MMC’s from the reduced service across the rest of the Mansfield Depot network, taking the ‘pronto’ brand to unusual (and often far from exotic) areas of the network. It’s allowed Stagecoach to encourage passengers still travelling to practice safer social distancing much easier than with a saloon
Nottingham City Transport have also done a sterling job during all this, reducing services to run on their core routes only. These emergency timetables were implemented on 25 March 2020 just after lockdown, and seem to be adequate as they’ve only changed once, which was on 5th April to add some extra peak journeys on many routes to aid social distancing for key workers following feedback.
CT4N have hit the headlines in our region at the beginning of last month after one of its drivers tested positive for COVID-19 and tragically passed away as a result, and after a second driver started to show symptoms they suspended all operations indefinitely from 10th April 2020. NCT stepped in with a half hourly ‘Medilink’ service from Queens Medical Centre to City Hospital via Wilkinson Street Park & Ride for NHS staff. Meanwhile, Derbyshire CC reallocated services 14 (Sandiacre to Ilkeston) and 29 (Sandiacre to Long Eaton) to Hulleys of Baslow temporarily on an emergency single bus timetable, taking the long established independent into areas it has never operated before. CT4N subsequently restarted operations on service 18 (Nottingham to Stapleford) from 20th April 2020, before taking back the 14/29 emergency timetable from Hulleys the following Monday.
Nottinghamshire County Council Transport Services has moved away from its fixed service arrangements, after initially maintaining a full service across the region but advising that all travel was free to stop cash handling and encouraging social distancing on board (although I appreciate this may be harder inside a Bluebird-bodied FIAT Ducato than many buses!) and aside from a handful of core timetabled key journeys in the morning and evening peaks for key workers on a handful of routes, it has moved to a largely on-demand ‘ring and ride’ model across its networks. One wonders if this may become the new ‘normal’ for such Council tenders that were only lightly used anyway prior to the COVID-19 outbreak.
And finally it turns out it’s not just South Pennine Community Transport using minibuses for lifeline grocery deliveries instead of carrying passengers (as featured in last week’s round up).
Over in Aylesbury Vale ‘Bernie the Bus’ has been doing much the same. Bernie’s seats “have carried fare of a different kind” (not my pun, it comes courtesy of Buckinghamshire County Council’s news release writers)…”much needed groceries collected from generous village residents to keep the local food bank stocked”.
Aylesbury MP Rob Butler praised the good work of Bernie the Bus during Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday pointing out party music plays out from the back of the bus “bringing a note of joy and happiness”. Butler asked Johnson to congratulate the organisers and all who support it, to which a beaming Johnson replied: “as a great believer in buses and part time manufacturer can I agree very strongly with him at the good work done by Bernie the Bus and all who support it and travel therein”.
“Part time manufacture”? No doubt baby Wilfred can’t wait for playtime as he gets older, but please spare us anymore costly bus design white elephants.
To finish, a nice NHS blue background from bluestar’s supportive bus ends this week’s round up. Onward to Lockdown Week 8 on Monday heralding the beginning of the end, or, as they say, the end of the beginning.
Thank you, Roger, for a thorough and thought-provoking review of the situation, as ever.
I might pick a tiny bit, however, with your observations of the TrawsCymru cleaner in protective gear. It’s probably not so over-the-top as it might seem if he’s spending some time spraying strong disinfectant or cleaning materials around, because by the time you’ve done a couple of buses that would be a lot of chemical mist to breathe in or float into the eyes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very good point; but maybe better not to promote it so heavily; probably best left as ‘behind the scenes’ work.
I like the idea of Heidi Alexander questioning the Government’s line on “those people over 70 and in venerable groups”, but I’m not convinced it’s quite what she said …
LikeLiked by 1 person
A very venerable comment! Many thanks; updated.
Some thoughts on spreading the peak which I’ve had for a long time but never seen expressed. These comments are actually based on the ‘old normal’ situation, geared around reducing bus industry costs for ‘peak buses’ and reducing fares and congestion to make bus travel more attractive:
Spreading peaks by staggering school start and finish times (so allowing each peak bus to serve more than one school) and allowing employees to work flexible hours is a great idea for multi-bus urban and inter-urban routes. (In a post-lockdown scenario one could even use the same lockdown marketing message as the stay at home to protect the NHS – ‘flatten the curve’.)
However, I think in fact the opposite is true for single-bus rural and rural-to urban routes. I’m thinking peak time routes into small market towns from their rural hinterland, with low demand for each journey purpose. In these cases it actually helps for all schools to have the same start and finish times and employees to all have (say) a 9-5 working day. This is so that all needs can be met by a suitably timed journey eg arrive in town at 0845 for students and workers then a second trip arriving around 1030 for concessionary paying shoppers, then a return trip at 1500 for students and shoppers and another at 1730 for workers. All needs met with one bus.
So the benefit of staggered times entirely depends on the type of town and route network / travel demand.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Couple of clarifying points to the above (again this is about the ‘old normal’ scenario and may or may not apply to a post-lockdown scenario):
To allow maximum efficiency and reduced peak bus fixed costs, for multi-bus urban and inter-urban routes school start and finish times could even be staggered by sufficient duration to allow a second (in extreme circumstances even a third) peak trip by each vehicle. Specific times will of course depend on route length, congestion etc. This does of course require trust and engagement between schools, local authority and bus operator(s).
For single-bus rural and rural-to-urban routes, staggered school and workplace start and finish times make it impossible to efficiently serve multiple journey purposes and a choice has to be made on which to favour (perhaps the one with the most demand) at the expense of the others. In this case the economics are much less favourable. Again, overcoming this requires trust and engagement between schools, employers, local authority and bus operator(s).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Many years ago Tideway School in Newhaven famously had very different hours – something like 8am to 2.30pm – enabling Southdown to utilise 7-8 vehicles on school journeys for the school on other school runs and commuter journeys after. A very efficient set up.
We were in Hong Kong in the first week of March. It was wall to wall masks on public transport but no real social distancing taking place. So, Playing devils advocate, looking at HK, are we taking this to far ?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think that the ‘2-metre’ social distancing rule was introduced mainly because it is simple, being both easy to explain and to understand. However, I’m sure that there are lots of circumstances where it really isn’t necessary – one of them being on coaches with high-backed seats such as the Greys of Ely graphic. There is effectively a barrier between each row of seats and the risk of transmitting the virus to a passenger on the row in front would be minimal, no more than exists,say, at a supermarket checkout with a plastic screen. If only the window seat in each pair were used, occupancy would approach 50% and be adequate for many journeys, especially off-peak.
This could apply to most inter-city trains with mainly airline seating (Pendolinos and Voyagers spring to mind), coach services and some top-end bus routes such as Transdev 36. It could also be useful if applied to hired-in coaches duplicating peak bus services.
I’m not so sure about commuter trains such as class 700 (which I’ve never been on) but looking at their ‘ironing-board’ seats, the same might well apply to them.
It has to be worth suggesting, as if trains and buses are limited to around 25% capacity, it’s hard to see any commercial public transport services at all, with all provision dependent on national or local government support (which in the case of many local authorities might mean none at all ! )
LikeLiked by 1 person
Staggering school times makes little difference in much of the UK as the pupil travel by dedicated school buses or taxis
Moist bu services out side of the large urban arrears are already fast disappearing and if you have social isolation on the buses that will finish off nearly all the routes
Many bus companies will be going bust in any case many in addition to bus services provided day tours and holidays and taxi services and all that work has gone and unlikely much of it will come back
Where this goes who knows it does not look good
Regarding the suggestions to stagger school times to make multiple trips by a single school bus, could the bus pick up the furthest-flung students on the first trip, and the nearest students on the second trip. In this way, the school start times will not be too compromised, social distancing can be achieved, and the costs will not be too much greater.
Thank you for a very informative but nonetheless sad survey. The government clearly haven’t a clue about how to safeguard public transport as shown by Johnson’s call to avoid it. Which will lead to massive environmental costs and even more isolation for those without cars. Even worse whilst it’s true any government would be struggling with this issue now I don’t think this lot are even trying. It all feels to piecemeal. Where’s the sponsorship and driving of a pressure cooker industry group to brainstorm some ideas ? I guess it’s being done privately but it needs a push from the ministry to force coordination and hard cash. Very sad.
LikeLiked by 1 person
In East Anglia we would have many fairly long routes that would serve a number of Towns and villages on the way who would depend on such vehicles to get to work. Many of the places served would not have the option of cycling or walking due to distances involved. How are people at intermediate towns and villages going to be able to get to work if the buses are already full?
You would get some routes where maybe 3 double deckers carrying 60-70 people on a regular basis in morning peak would be replaced by three services that can only carry for example 14 people each. Now of course demand is going to be down, but still there is a problem with transporting even these numbers when you go from a service that has capacity for 200 people in morning peak to 42 people. And then that’s before you get to evening peak and people being turned away from the last bus as they got in the queue late and having to take an unsafe taxi at great cost.
I have heard murmurings that the bus companies are going to be asked to provide extra services. But who is going to pay for them? To carry 100 people (half normal demand) at morning peak a bus company will need to factor in the costs of 7 buses and 7 drivers instead of 3 buses and 3 drivers and also factor in the fact the amount of revenue it gets will also be cut in half.
Without government support many of these smaller independent companies who have already saw their revenue streams of coach and bus hire, school contracts, holidays, excursions, day trips and sports team hire cut off are going to collapse.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Would be quite nice not to have a string of “Guardian” Readers and a hostile media constantly banging on about lack of Government policy regarding public transport. It is an UNSOLVABLE problem and ALL governments worldwide are having to re-write their thinking and strategy every twenty-four hours depending on the death figures the previous day. My only criticism is the ridiculous London-centric call for “much more walking and cycling”, as though most of the Country lives and works within three miles of Trafalgar Square or the equivalent focal point of their Town. Try cycling/walking when the weather changes in a few months time! But the very real tragedy is the fact that most members of the public outside London, will most certainly avidly listen to ministerial advice and probably never step on a bus again. The resultant effect of that hardly needs to be imagined, and the glorious and very welcome reduction in pollution levels, even (hopefully) with far less flying, will make pre-Covid 19 traffic levels look like a picnic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well . . . . here goes:
Social distancing on public transport . . . . it can’t be achieved; end of. When the R-number is well below 1, encourage public transport use and encourage the wearing of masks and place hand sanitisers by the entrance to all buses. Accept that some people may get sick, but for most people infected, it’s a bad flu (and no, I’m absolutely NOT ignoring those who have died; every death is a tragedy, but people do die of flu every year, despite vaccines). There is an inherent risk in life, and all we can do is minimise it. For all I know, Boris’ next pronouncement on or about June 1 will do just this.
School Transport . . . . if a bus service brings students in from several villages, then co-ordinate school start/finish times to maximise take-up. Run a “sweeper” bus at 1730 on Mondays-Thursdays for those students engaged in sports or other activities. Prevent parents driving little Johnny to school if their village has a school bus service. In urban areas, stagger school start/finish times so buses can cover two schools each day, and also stop the school run where a bus service is available.
The future of Buses . . . . here are the thoughts of Chairman Greenline . . . .
1. Remove ALL fuel duty on buses and coaches . . . end of. Restore Fuel Duty Rebate to what it means.
2. Actually reimburse OAP pass usage with full revenue foregone, not 40%-50% of it . . . . “no better and no worse off”, which is what it was supposed to be.
3. Remove Competition legislation from the bus industry. Bus Companies will not compete against each other ever again; there simply aren’t enough passengers to go around in a bus war any longer. Allow bus companies to co-ordinate timetables properly, by which they need to talk to each other (which they’re not allowed to do at present). Same with fares and multi-operator tickets . . . these have to be sponsored by a local transport authority. Remember . . . . the competition is now the car, not another bus!!
4. Allow LTA’s to return to providing socially necessary bus services again, which means providing appropriate funding. They can respond to requests from local councillors for bus sevices that (a) may have been useful 20 years ago, but aren’t now or (b) provide “nice to have” but useless bus routes.
With FDR and proper OAP reimbursement, a “commercial” bus service will return to being just that . . . . no subsidy required.
I’ve been on the buses for 45 years now . . . I remember the 1970’s, when it was the National Bus Company managing decline; and also the 1990’s and 2000’s, when (in hindsight) it was almost a second “Golden Age” of buses, with most companies innovating, promoting and renewing vehicles with ever-improved on-board features, including access for all passengers.
We are in danger of losing all that good work, but with assistance (NOT subsidy, just a level playing field) we might just get back there.
LikeLiked by 1 person
TfL about to go bust
Khan is saying TfL will run out of money by close of play today. . The way he has ben wasting money I am not surprised. Off peal bus and trains are ruining around almost empty and could have been substantially cut. He has also ben making up furloughed staffs pay to the full amount
Perhaps he needs to put fares up and put up council tax and cut back o underused service
LikeLiked by 1 person