Southampton…Cornwall. Is Slough next?

Tuesday 6th January 2026

After Go-Ahead’s victory in the ‘battle of Cornwall’ with next month’s withdrawal by First Kernow following last autumn’s competitive onslaught from Go Cornwall, observers are now wondering if the same scenario will play out in Slough, not least after another new head-to-head competitive service from Go-Ahead owned Carousel began yesterday with new route 458 between Uxbridge and Slough almost exactly replicating First’s route 3 between the same destinations.

It’s the latest development across Slough, Maidenhead and Windsor where Carousel and Reading Buses owned Thames Valley jostled for market share throughout most of last year. Tensions between the two operators can be traced back to Arriva’s withdrawal from High Wycombe in July 2024 when Reading Buses began new route 28 putting down a marker it wanted the route between Henley and Reading via Shiplake and Caversham despite that being one of the profitable links Carousel inherited.

Since then we’ve seen Carousel fill the gap between Maidenhead and Reading via Twyford with route 127 as well as expansion in the Maidenhead area and extending its reach as far as Staines-upon-Thames after winning tenders last spring from the Royal Borough. Thames Valley has also been active with new route 12 between Twyford and Reading and route 20 between Maidenhead and High Wycombe last autumn, all of which featured in blogs last year.

Not to be left out, First Bus joined in the fun last month and in so doing caused ripples with Carousel which has now responded in like kind against First while at the same time introducing some deescalation of its skirmish with Thames Valley.

There’s never a dull moment for buses in this part of Berkshire these days.

First’s changes saw route 6 withdrawn from Maidenhead (leaving the A4 corridor between Maidenhead and Slough to Thames Valley’s relatively new and competitive 704) and changed to run between Burnham across Slough to Wexham Park Hospital and Knolton Way North giving a new half hourly service to the Hospital which was previously served by First every 70 minutes. Secondly, a newly numbered route variation 7X (not sure why the use of the X as it’s not limited stop) has been introduced alongside route 7 giving a 15 minute frequency between Britwell, Slough and Langley’s Trelawney Avenue then via different routes in Langley every half hour to either Heathrow’s Terminal 5 (route 7) or Central Bus Station (route 7X).

In response to these changes Carousel has withdrawn one journey an hour between Wexham Post Office and Slough on route 106 (the frequency was half hourly with a through bus to the Chalfonts, with route 107) and has used this saving to resource its new competitive route 458 with two of the other three buses needed for the new service coming from a reduction in frequency on route 36 between Bourne End and High Wycombe from two to one bus an hour – a corridor now seeing Thames Valley’s recently introduced route 20. Carousel’s route 37 continues between High Wycombe, Bourne End, Maidenhead and Windsor but with modifications to the route in Maidenhead to serve St Mark’s Hospital (also served by Thames Valley’s 20).

Another change introduced yesterday was the diversion of alternate journeys on Carousel’s route 103 (from High Wycombe) to run from Slough to Langley’s Axis Park rather than Windsor. This is another example of the deescalation of the skirmish with Thames Valley (which has a significant presence between Slough and Windsor) and taking advantage of a frequency reduction by First Bus whose changes to route 7 have reduced the frequency via a well populated part of Langley and Axis Park from every 20 minutes to half hourly.

Here’s the First Bus network prior to its changes last month, with route 6 (yellow) still shown reaching Maidenhead as it once did …

… and here’s the latest map with route 6 now in green serving Burnham and more of Wexham as well as new route 7X joining the 7.

The above map also shows (top right) in pink, route 3 between Uxbridge and Slough, which is the one facing direct competition from Carousel’s new route 458 – the route number being a nod back to London Transport Country Bus days which used it for the same route. Until renumbered to 3, First Bus used route number 58. The new 458 runs half hourly with a very similar route as taken by First’s half hourly 3 although it avoids a deviation to serve Iver Heath and in Langley uses Trelawney Avenue whereas route 3 runs via Langley Road as shown on Carousel’s map below which I’ve annotated to show First’s variations in blue.

Departures on route 458 on Mondays to Fridays are 00 and 30 from Slough’s Wellington Street, five minutes ahead of route 3 at 05 and 35 (a classic of the competitive service genre), and from Uxbridge the 458 leaves at 15 and 45 with route 3 at 00 and 30 making for a more even split.

Looking at the running time in detail, for some reason First gives Uxbridge bound journeys a generous 14 minutes between Uxbridge Moor and Uxbridge whereas in the opposite direction it’s a more realistic six minutes – Carousel give seven minutes inbound and five minutes outbound. When I travelled yesterday, it took just four minutes. If it chose to, First could retard its departures from Slough by 10 minutes, providing an even headway with the 458 in both directions and still arrive in Uxbridge at the same times as now.

Despite the severe cold weather and it being the first day yesterday morning, Carousel was already doing very nicely on its Slough to Uxbridge bound journeys with passengers, arriving in good time at bus stops for First’s route 3, jumping aboard. The 11:00 departure from Slough carried 14 passengers with First’s arrival in Uxbridge just behind having six on board.

Carousel journeys towards Slough were understandably quieter for a first morning but even First’s departure on route 3 at 12:00 only carried 11, three of whom alighted in the section of Iver Heath not served by Carousel.

I can see using Trelawney Avenue in Langley (not served by the 3) generating new custom and avoiding the narrow road characterised by parked cars in Iver Heath (used by the 3) gives a perceptively much quicker journey on the 458 for the many end to end passengers who travel on the route, including, from observations yesterday morning, many students.

Both routes take a commitment of three buses. First’s route 3 operates hourly on Sundays and late into the evenings (thanks to local authority funding) while Carousel’s 458 has begun as a Mondays to Saturdays service through to early evening. The £3 fare cap applies on both routes with First’s 3 otherwise having a £2.50 fare for shorter journeys and Carousel’s 458 offering cheaper fares for short hop rides.

Carousel is distributing an attractive Best Impressions designed timetable leaflet for the new service with copies available on board buses.

There’s also a new Slough and Windsor timetable booklet with full details of this and other route changes as well as a timetable book for Maidenhead and another for High Wycombe.

First Bus are hitting back with a 10 rides for the price of 9 offer (also applying to routes 7/7X) using an old fashioned loyalty card which has to be stamped by the driver each time a passenger travels. Blog reader, and regular route 3 passenger, Andrew kindly sent me a copy of the email he received from First…

… and as Andrew notes it’s a strange way to do things in the modern era of contactless tap-on/tap-off era. Andrew explains “it could have been done by a refund based on tap-on/off journeys with no driver involvement, but instead it’s a retro approach with a physical card that has to be stamped when you buy a paper ticket, or would be if the drivers had been told about it and issued with cards and hand-stamps; I haven’t managed to get one yet a week after the scheme was meant to start!”

It came as no surprise to see yesterday that TfL hasn’t taken any interest in updating its bus stop flags with information about the 458 nor posted any timetables in the empty bus stop panels. Even route 3 was missing, and obviously its own routes too.

Knowing how keen the team at Carousel are, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Carousel timetables and route numbers make their way on to the bus stops very soon, as they were already posted at stops along the rest of the route outside TfL’s jurisdiction.

I understand the Carousel display posted over the weekend at Slough’s Wellington Street terminus stop had mysteriously disappeared by yesterday morning which is a bit concerning if someone is playing games.

Other pertinent changes of note include last month’s new timetable on First’s route X74 between High Wycombe and Slough which miraculously has regained an even half hourly frequency rather than the previous AI generated unmemorable frequency of every 35-40 minutes, which brings a welcome dose of common sense and puts some competitive pressure on to Carousel’s equally half hourly route 103. Another change from yesterday saw Carousel’s route 15 between Slough, Eton, Eton Wick, Dorney and Taplow extended the short distance to Maidenhead and route 127 has been diverted to serve Woodley which might lead to some consternation back at Reading Buses and potentially confuse passengers on a Saturday when it will run alongside the Thames Valley similarly numbered tendered route 127 over much of the same route.

Despite the clickbait headline to this post, I doubt this latest competitive move by Go-Ahead will unseat First from Slough. There’s one big difference this time; it’s called Heathrow Airport.

Heathrow dominates the bus scene across its large catchment area covering Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Surrey and West London where the AIrport funds a number of bus services enabling new links, frequency enhancements as well as late night and early morning journeys to increase the proportion of staff and passengers using public transport.

First’s route A4 between Cippenham and Heathrow Airport as well as the RailAir routes to Woking and Watford, which are based at its Slough garage, receive funding support from Heathrow Airport and furthermore, last month’s changes are a sign First is willing to invest more resources into the local network – probably around an extra four vehicles. I understand coaches First now use on Flixbus commitments are also based in Slough.

In his email to me, Andrew observed perhaps Carousel has left it too late with First having improved the service provision on the 3 in recent times, albeit with Council funding. He tells me “it does seem odd timing, coming not long after First finally brought in improvements with later evening running and a more frequent peak service to match demand rather than leave passengers unable to board as happened to me several times. If Carousel had come in a few years ago with a service including similar benefits they’d have wiped the floor with a complacent First, but what they’re doing now just seems like cherry-picking. The different route isn’t different enough to attract new users, and almost bypassing Iver Heath seems odd though it does avoid a narrow heavily-parked section.”

My own assessment is last month’s changes have all the hallmarks of First giving Slough one last throw of the dice to see if profitability can be improved to sustainable levels, but it maybe it is they who have left it too late with both Carousel and Thames Valley already demonstrating they’re prepared to take risks and invest in service improvements.

Carousel’s Slough and Windsor network

Thames Valley’s Slough and Windsor network

And it has to be said, both beat First hands down at the all important provision of quality information and marketing with even First’s online presence woefully wanting – take a look at its new route X74 timetable for example, showing every journey mysteriously duplicated in its usual unfriendly format with unintelligible “stop codes”.

If Carousel and Thames Valley find a way to co-exist and continue their own deescalation of tensions it’s likely to make it harder for First to regain market share.

Slough is hardly big enough to sustain two bus operators. It certainly can’t sustain three.

Roger French

Blogging timetable: 06:00 TThS

41 thoughts on “Southampton…Cornwall. Is Slough next?

Add yours

  1. Oops!! A couple of “Wrexham” names have crept in … it should be “Wexham”, of course.

    I wouldn’t like to call the future in Slough and East Berkshire … with the RBWM BSIP money and the Heathrow support (all done to try to get their third runway fully approved); there’s too much outside influence in the area.

    TV are certainly staying the course …. if they and Carousel ever decide to co-ordinate their attacks, then First might decide the war is lost.

    Of course, the Competition Commission (or whatever they’re called this week) might have something to say …..

    Like

  2. Roger. I think the problem with First is not competition per se, but the cost of renewing a depot’s fleet against the level of profit that can be made. So, for example, in Southampton, where I live, First Bus would have needed to replace its ageing bus fleet. What Bluestar (Go-Ahead) was doing was constantly replacing its fleet of diesel buses with newer ones. The policy with First has been is to replace with Electric vehicles. The. competition in Southampton was sufficient to ensure that without Government funding, which they got in Fareham, the viability of the Southampton depot to maintain profitability to a level that could support Head Office function was virtually zero.

    As to what depot will be next, yes it could be Slough but it could also be Weymouth. Let us also not forget that the first casualty of First Bus closing depot’s was in fact London

    Like

    1. And Weymouth could potentially be of interest to Go South Coast who of course already operate a handfull of tendered services in the area through their Damory subsidiary.

      Like

      1. Plus combining First’s Jurassic Coaster services with the Breezer network would remove some wasteful competition mainly around Wool and Lulworth, and give a very attractive combined network.

        Like

      2. That would certainly turn the clock back! I recall the days when the old Hants & Dorset & Southern National companies operated a joint service 11 between Bournemouth & Weymouth.

        An extension of the Breezer network to Weymouth might be the first step towards Go South Coast eventually taking over First’s Hampshire & Dorset operations. Fingers crossed!

        Like

        1. Yes, H&D called it the 11, but to Southern National it was the 36 and was one of their first Lodekka routes.

          Ian McNeil

          Like

          1. May be later Ian but I have a photo of a SN Bristol MW at Bournemouth bus station in 1969 operating on Route 11 to Weymouth.

            Like

  3. Andrew’s comment about the strange First loyalty scheme are spot on; I wonder whose idea that was?

    It is sad that our innovative and enterprising bus companies, when looking to grow their market, seem to leap at poaching customers from one another. Here’s a really exciting idea (for passengers, that is): getting from Uxbridge to, say, Bristol by bus and train is messy at present. Driving to Slough takes only 20 minutes. There is an express bus – SL8 – eastwards from Uxbridge; how about an express bus going westwards to Slough and connecting with the half-hourly fast trains to Reading? First would seem obvious – but I don’t suppose Firstbus managers ever talk to their First Great Western counterparts about making things better for passengers …

    Like

    1. According to Google Maps the driving time from Uxbridge to Slough now (09:15 on 6 Jan) is 21 minutes. The 458 is timetabled for 35 minutes. I’m not convinced that there is sufficient latent demand on the corridor to support a limited stop service (which would probably take about 30 minutes) in addition to the half hourly frequency provided until last week let alone the four buses now running.

      Like

      1. Was Uxbridge Slough ever Greenland or a Thames Valley local express segment of something longer? Maybe Arriva from Watford Uxbridge Slough not impossible but M25 closures would not help reliability

        Like

        1. I assume your reference to Greenland should be Green Line and not the arctic territory currently being eyed up by the current occupant of the White House!

          The original plans for the postwar Green Line network included route 719 which would have run from Windsor to Luton via Uxbridge and Watford. It never saw the light of day although express service 803 covered some of the roads that it would have served (but not from Uxbridge to Slough). Thames Valley (the original one) stopped running between Slough and Uxbridge in 1929 after its agreement with London General ended.

          Like

  4. What a brave soul: RF doing route surveys in such cold weather. I am itching to do the Heathrow – Stevenage service which has been in place for some time but will need much higher temperatures before I venture to the Heathrow CBS for my “treat”!

    Like

  5. Carousel’s destination screen shows a clear Uxbridge and a clear Slough.

    First’s destinations look more like Uxbrid9e and Slou9h.

    Which looks like quality and which looks like bodge?

    The little things do count especially on the front of an approaching bus.

    Ian McNeil

    Like

    1. No, I think it’s gone. I’ve previously noticed that when I first read your blog, the typos are there, but I then read the comments and see that they have been dealt with earlier. A check back, as today, reveals the corrected text. Very odd.

      Stuart S

      Like

  6. When I saw your headline, I planned to leave a comment saying that the difference between First Berkshire and Cornwall or Southampton is First’s Heathrow operations, however after reading your blog I am pleased to see that you reached this same conclusion 🙂

    Like

    1. And at the other end of Carousel’s expanding territory is another 458 with a significant RF heritage. Now run by White Bus, that 458 is the successor to the erstwhile LT 218, Staines (-upon- Thames, or Stain on the Thames as the late, self-appointed Lord of the Manor of Shepperton always called it)-Kingston. The 218/219 was, of course, the pair of last routes to be run by red RFs. Hopefully the two 458s are far enough apart not cause too much confusion, unlike the two service 8s here in Cambridge (and a B which can also look like an 8 to the uninitiated).

      Like

  7. As someone who occasionally travels between Slough and Uxbridge, Carousel’s 458 will become my “go to” bus.

    Until two years(?) ago, First Berkshire used Enviro 200s on service 3. Sadly, all these were transferred away and dreadful Wright Streetlites now dominate their single-deck routes.

    If Carousel have chosen to use Mercedes Citaros on the 458, I’ll opt for a relaxing journey in one of those!

    First Bus managers must travel very little on their networks, otherwise they might recognise the poor journey quality delivered by a Streetlite.

    P.S. Disappointing to note Carousel think a Wright Streetlite is suitable for the 103!

    Like

  8. Do First managers anywhere travel on their buses? My first encounter with one was in the days of First Edinburgh (or whatever it was called at the time), at a public meeting in Haddington to discuss local services. The bossman came, accompanied by two wingwomen. Had he come by bus – no, the flash car was parked outside. The gent concerned has long gone, but to me he’s forever tarnished by promising something in response to a question of mine, but never delivering it.

    Like

  9. All three operators have a presence in rail and tube replacement services which I think give some cherry on top sustenance for the operating bases.

    How does the network compare to essentially London County and Alder Valley days, if anything it has been Reading Corporation that seems to have expanded a little.

    JBC Prestatyn

    Like

  10. If one looks back a few years the whole Maidenhead town network was run by Reading Buses on tender , who also ran Green Line when First gave up,and most of the Slough and Windsor tenders. First ran the rest of the Slough commercial network, and let’s not forget Tfl 81.

    When Arriva closed High Wycombe and succumbed to Carousel, the latter was no doubt miffed when Reading Buses nicked one of the two Henley -Reading legs, and tried to get its revenge in Maidenhead by competing with other Reading Buses commercial routes, having already won some of the tenders, possibly at a low price.

    Carousel was also slowly upping the ante in the Slough Windsor area against First and Reading buses commercially. There is unlikely to be any money in Maidenhead and over time I predict that the local network will revert to the previous tendered network, with Slough/High Wycombe and possibly Windsor commercial, back to where we were before, and lunacy like 127 M/F will vanish.

    In Slough ,as has been mentioned elsewhere , First is effectively a Slough West to Heathrow operator supported by the Airport, plus High Wycombe with Carousel competition,Uxbridge ditto and Staines, presumably the next battleground.

    Will First stay and slog it out? They are clearly under pressure nationally with the end of rail franchises and the profit from those, and the end of the Zebra scheme means the big lumps of funding for electric buses are no longer available apart from those areas to be franchised. I think Carrousel are running a lot of poorly paying mileage a long way from High Wycombe with a lot of agency drivers who don’t come cheap. And Go Ahead need £2m a week to cover their interest bill from their greedy foreign owners so at some stage Carousel will need to make a decent return, as GA will also lose out on rail income and throwing in the towel in East Anglia shows they do have a pain threshold.

    Slough should be a goldmine for someone.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Carousel are becoming annoying with their cherry-picking, with lots of daytime-only routes and dead running to try to see others off. I’d love to see them try to improve service provision overall, with evening and weekend services, and surely they’re going to have to open a Maidenhead outpost before long. I’m not a huge First fan, but in Slough they’ve tried hard to make a decent go of it, in partnership with Heathrow, and it’s started to show decent results from a customer perspective.

    Like

  12. Here’s the thing … running buses 0700-1900 on Mon-Sat or thereabouts is generally commercially viable; maybe with some top-up / BSIP / S106 funds from various sources. A decent living can be made; and this MUST include some profit to fund new buses!!

    Running buses after around 1900 is a nice to have, but is also a sure-fire way to fritter away any profits from the daytime networks. There MUST be a reason for passengers to travel in the evenings, otherwise the buses will run empty … it’s sort of logical really.

    After a while, it may be possible to add in some later journeys …. but remember that deregulation effectively expected that LTAs would fund these “add-ons”.

    Sundays were similar, although with Sunday trading the mix has changed somewhat, such that 0900-1800 on Sundays is now often commercially viable. Note that Stagecoach will often run until late evening, but on Sundays even they usually run in by 2000.

    It is still (relatively) early days with TV and Carousel in Berkshire …. they may decide that what they run now is appropriate, and wait for Slough Borough and the Royal Borough to fund any further evening/ Sunday expansions.

    This is the deregulated world, whether you like it or not, and until the LTAs decide to waste taxpayers money on some form of franchising, it’s what we’ve got.

    Other opinions are available, but this opinion is based on 50 years of experience!!

    Like

    1. I would suggest that for people who want to take up jobs which require working shifts/evenings, buses running after 1900 are essential, rather than a “nice to have”.

      So that begs the question, who are buses for? For the operators, to make a reasonable profit when the going is good, but forget about the people (potential passengers) who might need to travel at other times? Or for the passengers (and potential passengers), connecting them to jobs and opportunities (and training/education, shopping, leisure, you name it), thus supporting the wider economy?

      It’s not an either/or, but in my opinion the deregulated model leans heavily to the former rather than achieving a good balance of both.

      Malc M

      Like

      1. @ Malc M . . . a fair point, but as you say yourself, there is no one right answer . . . it’s all about a balance between a reasonable timetable offering that benefits the most passengers, and an all-singing, all-dancing version that costs more money to provide than the expected fares income will support.

        If “society” feels that something else is required over and above the “commercially viable” version, then “society” is free to pay for that something else . . . and THAT is the deregulated model that worked pretty well from the early 1990s to the late 2000s. The rot started when Gordon Brown decided to give free travel to over 60s (which was unaffordable), and distorted the financial model, such that local Government had to choose between free travel and paying for marginal bus trips.

        In Hertfordshire, my local route ran 0600-2300 every day, with HCC funding after 1900 and on Sundays. After around 2011 (year), that became unaffordable, and the evening service was withdrawn. Route 318 (Mullany’s) tried a evening service until 2130 on Mon-Sat . . . apart from late-night shopping (Thursdays), passenger loadings were in the 1-2 range on the 1930; 2030; 2130 trips from Watford (and empty on the inbound trips) . . . they only lasted for 12 months.

        The overall revenue for the route simply wasn’t enough to continue running these trips, and there was no financial support available from Herts CC (and the local councils declined to support them as well). What should Mullany’s have done? Continued to lose money and pull the route? That would’ve disbenefited a whole lot more passengers!!

        This wasn’t the fault of deregulation per se, but of external interference in the market. If HCC wish to try “franchisation”, they’re welcome to do so . . . but my read of County policy is that they don’t believe the benefits will outweigh the financial costs . . . as Manchester is finding out, and Liverpool and Leeds will do soon. You gits wot you pays for!!

        Like

        1. Spot-on. The ability of Councils to pay for the service they wished to see has always been there, and deregulation, after initial hiccups, sorted out what was commercial and what required support. It didn’t “fail” anyone, and services levels simply reflected use, with much innovation by some companies which saw amazing uplifts in passenger numbers.

          It may have escaped notice by some, but many TfL routes are being quietly reduced, and along with the successful and long-overdue “Superloop” introduction, increased in other places. So even in that regulated environment reality is finally being faced. Use it or lose it!

          Terence Uden

          Like

    2. Until two days ago the 127 had a last service leaving Reading at 1725… not even enough for a basic 9-5.30 office worker to use. Yes it’s how they got it back to (Wycombe) depot by your 1900 cutoff but hardly useful in the real world. At least they’ve added one later run this week, but it’s still pretty early. That’s why I think a small base in Maidenhead is needed, as it allows later services with little or no extra driver cost. On the 37, the last southbound leaves around two hours before the last northbound – hardly good for passenger convenience!

      Like

  13. Whilst pleasing to see so many service improvements in an area, parts of which had the lowest bus use in the UK per head of population (Windsor and Maidenhead), the frequency of changes are getting hard to keep up with for this Enthusiast, let alone Mr and Mrs Joe Public. As others have commented, Heathrow is partly responsible and I noted recent figures showing there has been quite an uplift of passenger numbers in the area, with Windsor and Maidenhead now some points above the pre-Covid figure.

    Without wading back through volumes of timetables, I am sure that in the not too distant past, the Slough-Uxbridge link was completely broken altogether for a period. I stand to be corrected on that, but do recall when I lived in the area, the 458 alone was every 12 minutes on Saturdays, with the 457/A similarly 12-15 and requiring extensive weekend duplication!

    Terence Uden

    Like

  14. No one else has said this yet, so I will. It would be good to have a single, up to date and comprehensive area map showing all these bus routes to make sense of it all for a non-local. I’ll dream on!

    Steven Saunders

    Like

    1. The Borough Council published an all-operator map after the big changes last year. Given the almost monthly changes to the network since then they must be wondering why they wasted their money. Its a recurring theme of this place that there should be all operator maps available, this is a classic example of why many authorities don’t bother.

      Like

  15. Interesting to see the journey times the 458 is timed to take 35 minutes [even in the peaks] the 3 from 52 to 58 minutes, Slough-Uxbridge is a journey that passengers would make end to end given getting there by tube & rail would involve going via a very convoluted route.

    SM

    Like

  16. Regarding “July 2024 when Reading Buses began new route 28 putting down a marker it wanted the route between Henley and Reading via Twyford despite that being one of the profitable links Carousel inherited”, I thought it worth pointing out this isn’t quite right. Reading Buses’ Aqua 28 takes the former 800 route via Caversham, where they already operated the local buses into Reading. The route via Twyford is still Carousel’s 850 and has only recently seen Reading run over it as far as Twyford with their 12.

    Like

      1. Carousel started operating service 800. The reason the 800 was withdrawn was due to the 28 service starting, so the original comments I believe are accurate.

        Like

  17. What always amazed me was there was no through ticketing between the Underground and the 457, even though all LT. But there might be extra passengers for an Uxbridge to Windsor service, one only has to look at the hordes who get off in Slough for the GWR Slough – Windsor shuttle, and the Green Line has substantial traffic to Legoland, so a summer extension there might also be lucrative,

    Like

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑