Thames Valley toe treading

Saturday 8th November 2025

Earlier in the year I reported on interesting developments in the Thames Valley bus network some of which arose following tender contracts won by Go-Ahead owned Carousel Buses but also some commercial expansion by the company including the restoration of a link between Maidenhead and Reading via Twyford (route 127).

Reading owned Thames Valley also pitched in in the summer with new route 704 between Maidenhead, Slough and Heathrow Airport challenging First Bus’s dominance of that market.

Now, both Reading Buses and its associated Thames Valley are expanding again adding two further new routes to the former county known as Berkshire’s network. Route 12 runs half hourly between Twyford and Reading and route 20 runs hourly between Maidenhead and High Wycombe.

Both routes began on Monday and I took a ride on Thursday to see how they were settling in.

New half hourly route 12 only runs in the off-peak utilising two buses otherwise committed to school journeys in Reading at peak times on routes 91 and 92 so it’s one of those additional routes being run at the margin of costs (assuming fixed costs are priced into the school journeys). The timetable runs later in the afternoons on Saturdays and there’s no service on Sundays.

These extra two journeys an hour bring the Twyford to Reading off-peak bus offering from four to six buses an hour.

Carousel Buses has latterly been the main operator along this corridor with its half hourly route 850 (High Wycombe to Reading via Twyford) and the relatively new hourly 127 (Maidenhead, Twyford, Reading).

Reading Buses has been the minor operator with just hourly route 128 (from Wokingham) which takes a slightly longer route into Reading from Twyford via Sonning.

I travelled on the 12:07 departure from Reading thinking there might be shoppers going home for lunch. The bus arrived from its inbound journey at 12:04 with eight passengers alighting but there were no other takers to head back to Twyford nor did any join on the journey.

The journey was characterised by a seemingly padded timetable with the driver waiting time on four occasions during the 33 minute ride.

Twyford itself is served by a clockwise loop, most of which also has Carousel’s half hourly route 850 so the 12 isn’t adding anything new other than a bespoke timetable for Twyford.

Journeys from Reading at 07 past the hour generally slot in between Carousel’s departures which leave Reading at 00 (127) and 15/45 (850) although inbound to Reading the 12 treads on the toes of the 850 arriving at 00 which is probably why eight people alighted from the 12 at 12:04, as the 850 was running late and hadn’t appeared.

Reading Buses is using two former Newbury & District double decks but my bus on Thursday was a 16 year old ADL Enviro400 which was a bit past its prime.

It’s good to see a timetable leaflet for the new route has been produced although unfortunately this doesn’t include a traditional timetable layout detailing intermediate timing points – just departure times from each end of the route, which is a bit unhelpful especially with the loop working at the Twyford end.

I’d picked one up in the town centre which was just as well as the supply on board the bus was only for Woodley routes 13/14 which, it should also be said, cover the inner part of this contested corridor into Reading also running half hourly.

I’m not sure the Twyford to Reading corridor needs six buses an hour in the off-peak (in addition to four trains an hour, albeit not very evenly spread apart) but I guess the team at Reading Buses reckon the costs are more or less covered for the off-peak buses so why not grab some of the revenue Carousel’s new route 127 might have been taking from the populated part of the route served by the 13/14.

I’m not sure the team at Carousel Buses will see it quite so positively though and they may also not be enamoured with this week’s other new route added to the network, Thames Valley’s hourly service 20 between Maidenhead and High Wycombe which is treading on the toes of Carousel Buses hourly route 37 which has linked the two towns via Furze Platt, Cookham and Bourne End for many years.

Indeed, as part of the changes introduced earlier in the year, Carousel extended that route from Maidenhead through to Windsor creating a long lost connection across the Royal Borough and into neighbouring Buckinghamshire.

Thames Valley has been quite canny in not replicating the 37 route like for like with its new 20. It’s absorbed a section of former local Maidenhead route 7 by leaving the town in a westerly direction via St Mark’s Hospital before continuing on northwards to Furze Platt where it then duplicates the 37 through Cookham to Bourne End.

From there it follows the route taken by Carousel Buses service 36 via Flackwell Heath before heading further west to enter into High Wycombe via Marlow Hill and Desborough Avenue, ironically the route taken into and out of the town by the 850 thereby adding a touch of toe treading at both ends of that route from the 20 and the 12.

The timetable extends over an 06:10 to 21:30 day with a northbound journey taking 61 minutes and southbound 54 minutes meaning it commits just over two buses with an interworking arrangement with another route in Maidenhead to ease off the otherwise impossibly tight turnarounds especially as buses get 16 minutes stand time in High Wycombe.

I travelled on the 13:25 departure from Maidenhead’s Frascati Way and after picking up in the main central bus stop and Sainsbury’s we left the town with 13 on board. Five of these alighted within Maidenhead itself, so would have previously used a local service, with one to Cookham Dean and another to Cookham who would have caught a Carousel 37.

Interestingly of the five left on board, a group of three alighted in Flackwell Heath which previously would have involved a change of bus from the 37 to the 36, with the other two passengers travelling all the way to High Wycombe and looked like they were also trying out the new route out of interest like myself.

Leaving Maidenhead at 25 minutes past the hour route 20 is five minutes ahead of the 37 departure at 30 minutes past the hour. Returning from High Wycombe route 20 departs at 42 minutes past the hour with the hourly through journeys to Maidenhead on the 37 leave at 20 past the hour – there’s also an hourly ‘short’ to Bourne End at 50 minutes past the hour.

It’ll be interesting to see how this competitive situation plays out in the coming months. There’s no doubt toes are being trodden on here. Reading Buses’ internal communications explained the background as “some of the changes have been inspired by Carousel Buses August enhancements to routes 7A, 53, and 103 that mirror parts of our long-standing routes 7, 52 and 702/3”. In launching the new route 20 they add “we are hoping that it will be a very popular addition” perhaps helped by some attractive fare and ticket deals including extending its simplyMaidenhead ticket zone as far north as Bourne End and a new Wycombe zone north of Bourne End.

As you can see Thames Valley has introduced new Enviro200 buses on to the route while Carousel has similarly invested in the same for its enlarged Thames Valley network…

… which I see is being marketed using a ‘BOROUGHBUS’ branding.

With all these new buses and enhanced servcies, residents of the Royal Borough haven’t had it this good for many a year. If ever.

It also means there’s a lot of purple buses running around in Maidenhead between the two operators, and then of course the occasional newly branded purple liveried First Bus appears too.

Back at Maidenhead’s Frascati Way I noticed the main departure bus stop is now over subscribed at certain times each hour which can lead to a frantic dash by passengers. At one point there were five buses all trying to fit into the lay-by.

I also noticed the Royal Borough hasn’t got round to updating the departure displays other than someone has stuck route 20 details on top of what was already there.

But, impressively in High Wycombe bus station, Buckinghamshire’s comprehensive timetable displays had been updated…

… although the departure bus stop was another stick over job.

What was most impressive was this excellent display of timetable booklets from Carousel covering the Company’s various brands and with a plentiful supply of each one in the bus station.

Meanwhile, on board the bus on route 20 there was a supply of Thames Valley’s updated Maidenhead booklet…

… but I still think it’s regrettable one comprehensive booklet with a comprehensive map for both Carousel Buses and Thames Valley can’t be produced for the area.

I suspect tensions between the two operators means that hope is currently a forlorn one.

Roger French

Blogging timetable: 06:00 TThS

35 thoughts on “Thames Valley toe treading

Add yours

  1. Very unimpressed with Reading Buses’ actions here.

    The 127 and 850 aren’t just town services, they offer links from Twyford/Sonning to High Wycombe, Henley and Maidenhead. If the new route 12 undermines their profitability, the residents of Twyford/Sonning may end up with a significantly worse bus service.

    The 20 isn’t much better. As well as being scheduled to run just in front of the 37, it also leaves Maidenhead town centre for St Mark’s Hospital at almost the same time as Thames Valley’s own Route 7. So instead of doubling the service on the town section and on the long distance route, most residents will get no real benefit.

    Like

  2. A Last Gasp for Deregulation?? Or perhaps simply fulfilling one of the original aims of deregulation . . . that of increasing choice for passengers?

    I’m not convinced about the long-term future of Route 12 . . . it looks like a spoiler against Route 850. Mind you . . . perhaps, in overall Network terms, maybe Reading felt obliged to protect their eastern boundary?

    I do think that Route 20 is making a decent attempt at seeking out new passengers . . . a lot of new links there, which may or may not prove to be popular.

    Roger’s comment about Maidenhead having a better overall bus service since (maybe) the 1990s, when BeeLine closed their garage in the town, is spot-on . . . whether it will result in increasing overall passenger numbers is yet to be seen. My (admittedly) infrequent visits to the town have shown lots of buses with few passengers on board.

    I’ll also make the point that, in Luke Marian and Robert Williams, we are seeing managers who have no recollection of “regulation” per se . . . both able and also very in tune with “their patch”, which this blog and comments passim have always championed. I also find it very unlikely that franchising, in any form, will reach this corner of the Home Counties, so “son of deregulation” is likely to be seen here for many years to come.

    Mind you . . . a combined timetable book would be most welcome . . . perhaps the Royal Borough will step up? Although I’ll not hold my breath . . . !!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Whilst developments in the whole area have been quite impressive these last eighteen months, with seemingly new or enhanced services popping up every week (they may be running out of room in High Wycombe bus station as in Maidenhead if this carries on!), I cannot see all of it lasting in the present climate. One cannot blame Reading for seeing encroachments by Carousel, but the lost work in Maidenhead was contracted work won on a fair tender. So snapping at each other’s heels now, may, as pointed out by Phil Stubington, end up being counter-productive with passengers suffering as a result.

    In the brave new world of “franchising good”, “commercial operation bad”, I am not sure how modern law stands regarding the previous practice of banning even talking to a fellow Operator on pain of death? Whatever the situation, it would be really good if these two otherwise good operators could still down together.

    Terence Uden

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Terence …. I believe that an “honest broker”, in the form of a LTA, is still required for conversations between operators, especially with regard to fares.

      This may have been appropriate 25 years ago, especially after the “conversations” between Arriva and First in Leeds, but those days are long gone now.

      When I retimed Metroline’s Route 84 for March 2020, I timed “my” buses as separated from Uno’s 602 as possible …. if I’d involved Herts as honest broker, I’d’ve got nowhere!!

      Perhaps we just have to wait and see …..

      Like

  4. Dear Roger,

    I get quite frustrated that corporations who should produce timetable booklets, for their passengers/customers, don’t produce them.

    I, personally, would prefer some kind of local ‘guide’ to cross-reference buses with trains, and vice-versa.

    I think it is important to show the services in ‘book form’, as that is a ‘shop window’ to the product they’re suppposed to be ‘advertising’ for!

    Kind regards,

    Ben Walsh, Cambridge.

    Like

    1. I think its asking a lot of the Counci to fund a book when the network isn’t stable. Since the big network-wide changes on the 5th April this year there have multiple rounds of service changes.

      2nd June = 704 launched (TV)

      31st Aug – revised times for the 1/1A, 2, 7, 53, 128, 194, 227, 598 and 704 (TV)

      31st Aug – changes to the 10/10A, 37/37B, 103, 106/107 (Carousel)

      28 Sept – changes to various First Bus routes with BSIP funding

      2nd Nov – improvements to the X74 (First)

      3rd Nov – new route 20, revised times for 7, 16 and 702 (TV/RB).

      Like

      1. I think its asking a lot of the Counci to fund a book when the network isn’t stable

        I don’t see why councils should be funding publicity for bus companies’ commercial routes at all.

        If a council started producing sales publicity for Tescwaitbury’s because the business stopped doing it, we’d all be up in arms about the waste of public money and that is effectively what we’re expecting when we say that councils should produce bus timetables for big operators.

        Bus companies should publicise their own commercial ventures, and if they’re too blinkered or too penny-pinching to see the value of such publicity then it’s not for the taxpayer to make good on that lack.

        Like

        1. I think the point is that both Carousel and Reading Buses DO produce publicity for their own services, but there is no comprehensive timetable for Windsor and Maidenhead showing ALL services.

          Clearly you can’t really expect commercial operators to be funding publicity for competitors’ services, and if local authorities can’t be expected to do it either, then logically no-one is going to do it.

          This of course, is what has actually happened.

          Like

          1. Clearly you can’t really expect commercial operators to be funding publicity for competitors’ services,

            Roger’s Brighton & Hove managed to produce a comprehensive timetable despite some of those services being operated by competitors, I assume on the basis that doing so grew the market for everyone.

            If he could do it, why not Carousel or Reading?

            Let us not forget that the latter is supposedly one of Britain’s best bus companies and therefore setting the standards to which other operators should aspire. Why shouldn’t it be providing the level of customer information that Roger was providing almost 40 years ago at the height of deregulated competition?

            Like

            1. But even if some of these services were operated by competitors, if I recall correctly, none of them were actually competing head-to-head with B&H. They were either inter-urban services such as Stagecoach 700 and 17 or Metrobus 270-3 (or their predecessors) or tendered local Brighton services such as the former Big Lemon routes now operated by Compass Bus. As you say, publicising these helped grow the market and could only be of benefit to B&H. In many ways, it was just continuing the approach taken by many (but not all) NBC companies of including other operators’ services in their timetables. But of course, before deregulation these weren’t competitive either and including them in timetables benefited everyone.

              In the case of Windsor and Maidenhead, Carousel 7A and 52 were introduced to compete directly with parts of TV 7 and 53 without introducing any new links, while extended/enhanced 103 is a further competitor to RB/TV 702/703 on the Slough-Windsor corridor. It would be of no benefit to TV to advertise the 7A and 52 (which they probably hope will just go away) and they couldn’t include 103 in a timetable book without also including the others.

              Of course, the best solution would be some sort of accommodation between TV and Carousel which would remove the unnecessary competition without taking away the new facilities provided by Carousel 37/103 and TV 20, but that’s a lot easier said then done !

              Like

    2. Totally agree Ben. And after many years of producing them to an excellent standard, Hampshire County Council have just scrapped theirs!

      Like

  5. Perhaps TV and/or Carousel should look at the remaining First Berkshire operations in Slough. They have long since withdrawn from significant operations in Bracknell, Wokingham, Maidenhead and Windsor and are detached from First’s other territories.

    Perhaps a little pressure may produce interesting results…

    Like

  6. Not just focused on Carousel alone but Go Ahead as a whole. The flurry of recent expansions in all parts of the country both commercial and for tendered work, I wonder how much this is a classic venture capitalist pump and dump. Make the company look a lot bigger than it is and sell it quick before profitability really hits home.

    Like

    1. I wonder how much this is a classic venture capitalist pump and dump. Make the company look a lot bigger than it is and sell it quick before profitability really hits home.

      I agree.

      The new owners were very quick to dump the East Anglia operations after making cosmetic changes to the brand (to make it appear more saleable?) and it has to be said that north of the Humber GoAhead isn’t exactly seen as a quality operating group. Sure, it’s better than Arriva – but that’s not saying much!

      I wonder who would be interested in the various operations outside franchising-land, though. I can’t see anyone who really would be.

      Like

  7. Um . . . I don’t quite see GoAhead in the way that @ANonyMouse does; although “plump and dump” is a new one on me which I rather like!

    I was in Newcastle in 2024, and whilst I found the GoAhead operation to be a bit “untidy”, with mixed branding messages, in general buses seemed to be running well, and on a very limited sample, pretty close to time. I’m not a fan of route branding anyway . . . it makes cascading of buses difficult, and having “generic” spares more expensive. It’s interesting that Oxford Bus, with its sub-brands Carousel and Thames Travel, seems to be moving towards more inclusive liveries and brands.

    As far as GoAhead Norfolk and Suffolk is concerned . . . ISTR that the intent was to buy smaller operators, unify them and expect First Eastern Counties to roll over and exit in double-quick time (think First in North Devon). First found a backbone from somewhere, and refused to hand over the keys, leaving GoAhead with a bunch of low-revenue services that needed bulk to survive, and with FEC sticking around, that wasn’t going to happen. I doubt that the sale price was very high, and TMS saw an opportunity and grabbed it.

    I do wonder if Reading Buses, with its purchase of Courtney in Bracknell, saw a similar opportunity in Slough and First with its Thames Valley operation . . . I suspect the jury may still be out here.

    I really don’t think “plump and dump” applies here . . . more that GoAhead, with its upcoming loss of GTR to DfT ownership, wanted to increase turnover in a sector that won’t be subject to governmental control! Certainly their vehicle investment in Pulhams and Pearce’s doesn’t seem the actions of a company about to cut and run. And of course GoAhead is owned (in a large part) by foreign investors . . . recently to an Australian outfit??).

    Like

      1. Yes, there’s only one Aqua 28. It started at the same time as Carousel’s Arriva replacements, so both operators planning and launching at the same time. Not a competitive stab like Carousel with their 7A and 52. Can’t blame Reading competing now when Carousel have been doing it for some time now!

        Like

        1. Carousel declared their intention almost overnight to replace Arriva’s Wycombe network in full, including operation of the 800 850. The 28 announcement came later, and can’t be doing much for the stability of the operations that Carousel are trying to grow back in Wycombe.

          Like

  8. I personally can’t comment on other parts of the Go Ahead Group when it comes to their bus operations, however, living in the south of England I can vouch for Go South Coast. We’re served by MoreBus & when I use them (using their excellent app) the buses *run on time, the drivers are professional as well as helpful & polite. I recently visited the Isle of Wight & found Southern Vectis (also part of GSC) operating in the same way, reliable & on time (their app worked well most of the time). I do personally miss Yellow Buses (it went into administration in 2022) as they served the Bournemouth & surrounding areas rather well, as Malc M will no doubt verify. *services around Christchurch are currently badly affected by badly planned roadworks.

    Like

    1. @Anon 16:30 – thanks for the mention.

      I only moved to Bournemouth after Yellow Buses were no more, so can’t really comment on how good (or otherwise) they might have been. I do hear anecdotally, however, that since Morebus took over the routes, you can now rely on the buses actually turning up. If those anecdotes are factual, it sounds like Yellow Buses had been struggling to provide a reliable service.

      There is a lot to commend Morebus. The whole operation appears very customer-focussed – I find the drivers are welcoming; the buses are well-presented (although route-branded buses can often be found wandering onto other duties); the app is good; tap-on-tap-off ticketing saves me from having to work out what ticket I might need. They still produce a printed timetable book covering Bournemouth, Christchurch, Poole and Purbeck, and which now includes their services in the New Milton and Lymington area (now that Hampshire no longer produce their guides) – although it is a shame it doesn’t include Bluestar-branded route 6 (Lymington <> Southampton).

      One thing that is noticeable is that where Morebus replaced Yellow Buses services, on most routes the frequencies were lower. Examples:

      • Routes 1/1a/1b Bournemouth to Christchurch combined, 8 buses per hour instead of 12 (although the m2 competed as far as Southbourne)
      • Route 2, Holdenhurst Road served only half-hourly (Yellow Buses was 15 minutes)
      • Routes 5/5a through East Howe and West Howe, combined 15 minutes in place of 10 minutes – although this has since been boosted with the help of BSIP funding

      I haven’t had a look at how they are coping with the Christchurch roadworks, although I did see they have ensured temporary route 1s is tracking in realtime on the app.

      Malc M

      Like

  9. Maidenhead is an unlikely place for a bus war. The only vaguely commercial bits in the town are to Halifax Rd and Woodlands Park, Thames Valley 7. Carousel have competed as far as Cox Green as their 7A since April.

    There has then been the replacement of the Arriva Reading – Henley service where Reading Transport restarted that link with , albeit by two different intermediate routes going from e30 to e15 against Carousel

    Carousel also started and has improved their 103 between High Wycombe and Windsor which takes a pop at both Thames Valley and First

    As noted Carousel did win tenders in the Maidenhead area, wether they went in at a silly price only they will know

    The end result appears to be far too many buses, and it’s a case of who blinks first, there is definitely not the revenue to support whats now running

    Like

    1. Seems to me like things were pretty stable before the 28 started up. I wonder if that was an irritant to Carousel Buses in their takeover of the Wycombe network. Maybe that was the intention…

      Like

  10. It seems pretty poor that the main bus departure point for a town of nearly 70,000 people is a 50m layby with two bus shelters on the pavement at the side of an urban dual carriageway 🙄

    Like

    1. Not really … said lay by is about as close to the shops as it can be without running through the town centre itself, and standing space inside the town centre is very limited.

      There’s no spare land to make a bus station, for example … not ideal …. but it could be worse.

      Like

  11. I also like pump and dump, but I don’t see that is what is going on here. The inevitable loss of GTR will reduce turnover massively, to be replaced by the Elizabeth Line franchise.

    Maidenhead/Slough and Cornwall is a case of too much adrenaline flowing, and not the traditional way that Go Ahead have operated so I wonder if the influence of the new owners is being felt. East Anglia suffered from a large fleet of life expired deckers with too low tender prices. Last annual accounts showed an interest bill of £102m, way up on ownership costs when it was a listed company. The malign influence of overseas venture capitalists is obvious, ditto the water industry, vets, dentists, childcare etc etc. When will we ever learn

    Like

    1. Regarding Maidenhead, I would have thought Go Ahead businesses, irrespective of ownership era, would have bit for long term tenders. Not sure what the new ownership would have to do with this one.

      Like

  12. Various points in reply to the above comments!:

    Carousel has produced a combined map for RBWM Council – it’s on the Council’s website but in the Carousel style, with the addition of other operators’ routes. https://www.rbwm.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2025-10/transport_map_of_bus_services_in_rbwm.pdf

    Thames Valley Buses has, unusually, inserted extra journeys in their route 7 timetable in one direction only from Cox Green to Maidenhead town centre, running just in front of their own journeys coming from Woodlands Park. It’s one extra vehicle, running empty back from the town centre and every 30 mins. https://www.thamesvalleybuses.com/services/CTNY/7?date=2025-11-13&direction=inbound&all=on

    @greenline727 – why would the local authority have been ineffective in brokering an interworked timetable? I think the phrase is ‘pump and dump’, but ‘plump and dump’ works almost as well!

     @philstubington – I think the 28 Sept First Bus changes were just improvements to Route 3 Slough – Uxbridge, but extravagantly worded by First (which was sadly regurgitated by Slough Borough Council) to make it look like more routes were involved (but ironically hidden in the wrong section of First’s website if I recall correctly) – I didn’t note any significant changes to their other Berkshire routes 6, 7, 8, A4 and X74 at that time. Thanks for listing the November changes to route X74 though as that is news to me.

    Anonymous @1122 – yes, I would have expected the ‘old’ First to have folded by now, at least on their non-Heathrow Berkshire (3, 6, X74) routes. It seems they’re made of stronger stuff locally or (more likely) acting on instructions from above for the longer term.

    @steveinselby – I believe RBWM have a long term plan to have a bus station in Maidenhead. In my opinion though, then missed an opportunity (perhaps still recoverable) to provide a full bus interchange at the front of Maidenhead rail station. Not much room for standing (which might be possible off-site in Frascati Way) but I think enough space for about five or six stands. But car parking (and pedestrian circulation space) won out, perhaps unsurprising given the Elizabeth Line extending there.

    Stephen H

    Like

  13. Your experience of the 12 dragging its heels out of Reading is mirrored on the 850 – a route which I drove during a (sadly ill-fated) period at CB earlier this year. It was normal to need to hang around at the Wee Waif and Twyford Waitrose to lose some time! If the 12, 28 and 850 et al are all sharing the stand at Friar Street I can imagine it getting a bit cosy. Carousel did try 3 buses an hour through to Reading for a time but must have decided that it made more sense to concentrate resources at the Wycombe end with the Henley shorts.

    From what I have seen on the 36, the usual double deckers could easily be swapped out for single deckers, bar for a couple of busy trips at school times. Two routes through Flackwell Heath doesn’t seem sustainable in the medium/long term. The decision to run the 20 down Desborough Avenue is a canny one as there are always short-hop passengers who want to travel ‘down the hill’, and who have become used to the frequent and pretty reliable service provided on the 850 there.

    Like

  14. Alas, no service between High Wycombe and Oxford – as I enjoyed during my first full day’s ownership of an ENCTS pass. November 2017. Walton on Thames – Oxford and back – free. Outwards via Kingston, Heathrow and High Wycombe. Back via Aylesbury, High Wycombe and Heathrow. Only snag: my final hop on Route 555 from Heathrow entailed a half hour walk home is it finished its trip in Walton on Thames town centre. Have recently had my eighth anniversary of ENCTS ridership.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I believe you can use the Airline bus service from Wycombe Coachway to Oxford using your pass, but I’ve never actually tried it. You certainly can’t use it on the Wycombe to Heathrow/Gatwick legs.

      Like

  15. Thames Valley’s “toe treading” seems to be working. The 704 set up only earlier this year between Maidenhead, Slough and Heathrow has worked. First are withdrawing their Maidenhead to Slough service from 7 December, with the western half of the 6 now running to Burnham via Britwell instead (today’s route 12).

    Like

  16. Apologies for late commenting, but as a local benefiting from the new services feel I should jump in!

    The ‘main’ departure point for services may be Frascati Way, but for passengers it’s the town centre stop opposite Greggs, so more layovers should be sent to Broadway. It does get congested occasionally in town but if they banned cars on the high street section it would be fine.

    It’s not all good news though, the ‘new’ service to White Waltham has already been cut back – they’re not giving changes long to bed in before ditching them, which is an ominous sign.

    The 20 serving Flackwell Heath is a very clever move, and introduces a clear differentiation between the operators. That will be more popular than a lot of people realise – currently it’s only linked to Maidenhead on Sundays. Most importantly for Roger though is to note that the leaflet for it was delivered to all homes in Maidenhead, it’s been a long time since anyone has advertised buses here!

    It’s still annoying though that there isn’t a late service back from Wycombe (on either route), particularly since I mainly use it to connect from Chiltern trains. Similarly on the 704, which doesn’t run after 1845 (useless for evening arrivals at Heathrow or airport staff), or at all on Sundays. Hopefully the latter at least will change when First pulls out.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to A Nony Mouse Cancel reply

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑